An examination of the relationships between coping styles, task-related affect, and the desire for decision assistance

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 37-49

  Creyer, Elizabeth H ^a   Kozup, John C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038734031     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00506-X     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
2. Bettman, J. R. (1979). An information processing theory of consumer choice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Brown, C. L., & Carpenter, G. S. (2000). Why is trivial important? A reasons-based account for the effects of trivial attributes on choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(March), 372-385.
4. Burnett, P., Leon, M., & Beswick, G. (1989). Validation of the flinders decision making questionnaire in course decision making in students. Australian Psychologist, 24, 285-292.
5. Chernev, A. (2001). The impact of common features on consumer preferences: A case of confirmatory reasoning. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 475-488.
6. Cohen, J. B., & Areni, C. S (1991). Affect and consumer behavior. In S. R. Thomas & H. K. Harold (Eds.), Handbook of consumer behavior (pp. 188-240). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7. Dhar, R. (1996). The effect of decision strategy on deciding to defer choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9(December), 265-281.
8. Dhar, R., & Nowlis, S. M. (1999). The effect of time pressure on consumer choice deferral. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(March), 369-382.
9. Fitzsimons, G. J., Greenleaf, E., & Lehman, D. R. (1997). Decision and consumption satisfaction: implications for channel relations (working Paper No. 313). Los Angeles: UCLA Marketing Studies Center.
10. Garbarino, E. C., & Edell, J. A. (1997). Cognitive effort, affect, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 147-158.
11. Goldstone, R. (1994). The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork. Cognition, 52(June), 178-200.
12. Greenleaf, E. A., & Lehmann, D. (1995). Reasons for substantial delay in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(2), 186-199.
13. Holbrook, M. B., Chestnut, R. W., Oliva, T. A., & Greenleaf, E. B. (1984). Play as a consumption experience: The roles of emotions, performance, and personality in the enjoyment of games. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(September), 728-739.
14. Houston, D. A., Sherman, S. J., & Baker, S. M. (1989). The influence of unique features and direction of comparison on preferences 25 (March), 121-141.
15. Janis, I., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice and commitment. New York: The Free Press.
16. Johnson, M. D. (1984). Consumer choice strategies for comparing noncomparable alternatives. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(December), 741-753.
17. Luce, M. F. (1998). Choosing to avoid: Coping with negatively emotion-laden consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(March), 409-433.
18. Luce, M. F., James, R. B., & John, W. P. (2001). Emotional decisions: Tradeoff difficulty and coping in consumer choice. In R. J. Deborah (Ed.), Monographs of the Journal of Consumer Research (vol. 1). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
19. Klein, N. M., & Yadav, M. S. (1989). Context effects on effort and accuracy in choice: An inquiry into adaptive decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(March), 411-421.
20. Mann, L. (1982). Flinders decision making questionnaire II, unpublished questionnaire, The Flinders University of South Australia, 1982.
21. Mann, L., Burnett, P., Radford, M., & Ford, S. (1997). The melbourne decision making questionnaire: An instrument for measuring patterns for coping with decisional conflict. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10, 1-19.
22. Mantel, S. P., & Kardes, F. R. (1999). The role of direction of comparison, attribute-based processing, and attitude-based processing in consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(March), 335-352.
23. Markman, A. B., & Genter, D. (1993). Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 517-535.
24. Markman, A. B., & Medin, D. L. (1995). Similarity and alignment in choice. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 63(2), 117-130.
25. Murray, E. J. (1975). Resolution of complex decisional conflicts as a function of degree of avoidance. Journal of Research in Personality, 9(September), 177-190.
26. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 19, pp. 120-205). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
28. Richins, M. L. (1997). Measuring emotions in the consumption experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(September), 127-146.
29. Schneider, S. L. (1992). Framing and conflict: Aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(September), 1040-1057.
30. Tversky, A., & Shafir, E. (1992). Choice under conflict: The dynamics of deferred decision. Psychological Science, 3(November), 358-361.
31. Westbrook, R., & Oliver, R. L. (1991). The dimensionality of consumption emotion patterns and consumer satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(June), 84-91.
32. Zhang, S., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (1999). Choice-process satisfaction: The influence of attribute alignability and option limitation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77(March), 192-214.
33. Zhang, S., & Markman, A. (1998). Overcoming early entrant advantage: The role of alignable and nonalignable differences. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 413-426.