Spatiotemporal characteristics of dynamic feature binding in visual working memory

Vision Research

Volumn 43, Issue 20, 2003, Pages 2107-2123

  Saiki, Jun ^a,b  

^a JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Attention; Feature binding; Multiple object tracking; Visual memory

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COLOR; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; OBSERVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VELOCITY; VISUAL MEMORY; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 0038648338     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00331-6     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ballard D.H., Hayhoe M.M., Pook P.K., Rao R.P.N. Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 20:1997;723-767.
2. Blaser E., Pylyshyn Z.W., Holcombe A.O. Tracking an object through feature space. Nature. 408:2000;196-199.
3. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision. 10:1997;443-446.
4. Chun M.M., Cavanagh P. Seeing two as one: Linking apparent motion and repetition blindness. Psychological Science. 8:1997;74-79.
5. Dorfman D.D., Alf E. Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory and determination of confidence intervals - Rating method data. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 6:1969;487-496.
6. Horowitz T.S., Wolfe J.M. Visual search has no memory. Nature. 394:1998;575-577.
7. Just M.A., Carpenter P.A. A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review. 99:1992;122-149.
8. Kahneman D., Treisman A., Gibbs B.J. The reviewing of object files: Object specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology. 24:1992;175-219.
9. Kanwisher N. Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: Errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 17:1991;404-421.
10. Leslie A.M., Xu F., Tremoulet P.D., Scholl B.J. Indexing and the object concept: Developing 'what' and 'where' systems. Trends in Cognitive Science. 2:1998;10-18.
11. Luck S.J., Vogel E.K. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature. 390:1997;279-281.
12. Metz C.E., Pan X. "Proper" binormal ROC curves: Theory and maximum-likelihood estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 43:1999;1-33.
13. O'Craven K.M., Downing P.E., Kanwisher N. fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature. 401:1999;584-587.
14. Pashler H. Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception and Psychophysics. 44:1988;369-378.
15. Pelli D.G. Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. Journal of Optical Society of America A. 2:1985;1508-1532.
16. Pelli D.G. The video toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision. 10:1997;437-442.
17. Phillips W.A. On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception and Psychophysics. 16:1974;283-290.
18. Pylyshyn Z.W. The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model. Cognition. 32:1989;65-97.
19. Pylyshyn Z.W., Storm R. Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for both serial and parallel stages. Spatial Vision. 3:1988;179-197.
20. Quick R.F. A vector magnitude model of contrast detection. Kybernetik. 16:1974;65-67.
21. Rensink R.A. Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing. Vision Research. 40:2000;1469-1487.
22. Rensink R.A., O'Regan J.K., Clark J.J. To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science. 8:1997;368-373.
23. Roberts S., Pashler H. How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychological Review. 107:2000;358-367.
24. Saiki J. Feature binding in object-file representations of multiple moving items. Journal of Vision. 3:2003;6-21.
25. Scholl B.J., Pylyshyn Z.W. Tracking multiple items through occlusion: Clues to visual objecthood. Cognitive Psychology. 38:1999;259-290.
26. Scholl, B. J., Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Franconeri, S. L. (Submitted for publication). The relationship between property encoding and object-based attention: Evidence from multiple object tracking.
27. Tipper S.P., Weaver B., Jerreat L.M., Burak A.L. Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 20:1994;478-499.
28. Towse J.N., Hitch G.J., Hutton U. On the interpretation of working memory span in adults. Memory and Cognition. 28:2000;341-348.
29. Treisman A. Solutions to the binding problem: Progress through controversy and convergence. Neuron. 24:1999;105-110.
30. Valdes-Sosa M., Cobo A., Pinilla T. Transparent motion and object-based attention. Cognition. 66:1998;B13-B23.
31. Verstraten F.A.J., Cavanagh P., Labianca A.T. Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention. Vision Research. 40:2000;3651-3664.
32. Watson A.B. Probability summation over time. Vision Research. 19:1979;515-522.
33. Wheeler M.E., Treisman A. Binding in short-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 131:2002;48-64.
34. Wickens T.D. Measuring the time course of retention. Izawa C. On human memory: Evolution, progress, and reflections on the 30th anniversary of the Atkinson-Shiffrin model. 2000;245-266 Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
35. Wickens T.D. Elementary signal detection theory. 2002;Oxford University Press.
36. Xu F., Carey S. Infants' metaphysics: the case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology. 30:1996;111-153.
37. Xu Y. Limitations of object-based feature encoding in visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 28:2002;458-468.