Is the neotropical flora ready for the phylocode?

Botanical Review

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 22-43

  Janovec, J P ^a   Clark, L G ^b   Mori, S A ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF SYSTEMATIC BOTANY   (United States)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LINNAEA;

EID: 0038609010     PISSN: 00068101     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1663/0006-8101(2003)069[0022:ITNFRF]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (76)

1. Barkley, T. M. 2001. Floristic studies in contemporary botany. Madroño 47: 253-268.
2. Benton, M. J. 2000. Stems, nodes, crown clades, and rank-free lists: Is Linnaeus dead? Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 75: 633-645.
3. Berlin, B. 1992. Ethnobiological classification: Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
4. Cantino, P. D., H. N. Bryant, K. de Queiroz, M. J. Donoghue, T. Eriksson, D. M. Hillis & M. S. Y. Lee. 1999. Species names in phylogenetic nomenclature. Syst. Biol. 48: 790-807.
5. Chase, M. W., D. E. Soltis, R. G. Olmstead, D. Morgan, D. H. Les, B. D. Mishler, M. R. Duvall, R. A. Price, H. G. Hills, Y.-L. Qiu, K. A. Kron, J. H. Rettig, E. Conti, J. D. Palmer, J. R. Manhart, K. J. Sytsma, H. J. Michaels, W. J. Kress, K. G. Karol, W. D. Clark, M. Hedén, B. S. Gaut, R. K. Jansen, K.-J. Kim, C. F. Wimpee, J. F. Smith, G. R. Furnier, S. H. Strauss, Q.-Y. Xiang, G. M. Plunkett, P. S. Soltis, S. M. Swensen, S. E. Williams, P. A. Gadek, C. J. Quinn, L. E. Eguiarte, E. Golenberg, G. H. Learn Jr., S. W. Graham, S. C. H. Barrett, S. Dayanandan & V. A. Albert. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 528-580.
6. Clark, L. G. 1997. Diversity, biogeography and evolution of Chusquea (Poaceae: Bambusoideae). Pp. 33-44 in G. P. Chapman (ed.), The bamboos. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
7. Croat, T. B. 1978. Flora of Barro Colorado Island. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, CA.
8. Davis, G. M. 1995. Systematics and public health. BioScience 45: 705-714.
9. De Queiroz, K. 1994. Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 27-30.
10. _. 1997. The Linnaean hierarchy and the evolutionization of taxonomy, with emphasis on the problem of nomenclature. Aliso 15: 125-144.
11. _ & J. Gauthier. 1990. Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: Phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Syst. Zool. 39: 307-322.
12. _ & _. 1992. Phylogenetic taxonomy. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 449-480.
13. _ & _. 1994. Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 27-31.
14. Dominguez, E. & Q. D. Wheeler. 1997. Taxonomic stability is ignorance. Cladistics 13: 367-372.
15. Fellman, B. 2000. What's in a name? Yale Alumni Mag., April: 36-39. 〈http://www.yalealumnimagazine.com/issues/00_04/phylo.html〉.
16. Forero, E. & S. A. Mori. 1995. The Organization for Flora Neotropica. Brittonia 47: 379-393.
17. Frodin, D. G. 2001. Guide to standard floras of the world: An annotated, geographically arranged systematic bibliography of the principal floras, enumerations, checklists, and chorological atlases of different areas. Ed. 2. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
18. Gaut, B. S., L. G. Clark, J. F. Wendel & S. V. Muse. 1997. Comparisons of the molecular evolutionary process at rbcL and ndhF in the grass family (Poaceae). Molec. Biol. & Evol. 14: 769-777.
19. Gentry, A. H. 1982. Neotropical floristic diversity: Phytogeographical connections between Central and South America, Pleistocene climatic fluctuations, or an accident of the Andean Orogeny? Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 69: 557-593.
20. _. 1993. A field guide to the families and genera of woody plants of northwest South America (Colombia, Ecuador, Peru), with supplementary notes on herbaceous taxa. Conservation International, Washington, DC.
21. Grayum, M. H., B. E. Hammel & N. Zamora. 2000. The cutting edge 7 (4). 〈http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/Edge/oct00/oct00not.html〉.
22. Greuter, W., J. McNeill, F. R. Barrie, H. M. Burdet, V. Demoulin, T. S. Filgueiras, D. H. Nicolson, P. C. Silva, J. E. Skog, P. Trehane, N. J. Turland & D. L. Hawksworth. 2000. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Saint Louis code), adopted by the Sixteenth International Botanical Congress, St. Louis, Missouri, July-August 1999. Regnum Vegetabile, 138. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein, Germany.
23. Haeckel, E. 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen: Allgemeine grundzüge der organischen formen-wissenschaft, mechanisch begründet dutch die von Charles Darwin reformirte descendenz-theorie. Vol. 2, Allgemeine entwickelungsgeschichte der organismen. Georg Reimer, Berlin.
24. Hall, H. M. 1923. The genus Haplopappus: A phylogenetic study in the Compositae. Carnegie Institution, Washington, DC.
25. _ & F. E. Clements. 1923. The phylogenetic method in taxonomy: The North American species of Artemisia, Chrysothamnus, and Atriplex. Carnegie Institution, Washington, DC.
26. Henderson, A., S. P. Churchill & J. L. Luteyn. 1991. Neotropical plant diversity: Are the northern Andes richer than the Amazon Basin? Nature 351: 21-22.
27. Hennig, W. 1950. Grundzüge einer Theorie der Phylogenetischen Systematik. Deutscher Zentralverlag, Berlin.
28. _. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. D. D. Davis & R. Zangerl, trans. Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana.
29. Hopkins, H. C. F., C. R. Huxley, C. M. Pannell, G. T. Prance & F. White. 1998. The biological monograph: The importance of field studies and functional syndromes for taxonomy and evolution of tropical plants. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
30. Janovec, J. P. 2000. A systematic study of Compsoneura, a Neotropical member of the nutmeg family (Myristicaceae). Ph.D. diss., Texas A&M Univ.
31. Janzen, D. H. 1996. On the importance of systematic biology in biodiversity development. A.S.C. Newslett. 24: 23-28.
32. Judziewicz, E. J., L. G. Clark, X. Londoño & M. J. Stern. 1999. American bamboos. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
33. Kron, K. A. 1997. Exploring alternative systems of classification. Aliso 15: 105-112.
34. Lee, M. S. Y. 2000. A worrying systematic decline. Tree 15: 346.
35. Leigh, E. G., Jr. 1999. Tropical forest ecology: A view from Barro Colorado Island. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
36. Mayr, E. & P. D. Ashlock. 1991. Principles of systematic zoology. Ed. 2. McGraw-Hill, New York.
37. Miller, D. R. & A. Y. Rossman. 1995. Systematics, biodiversity, and agriculture. BioScience 45: 680-686.
38. Mishler, B. 2000. Rank-free phylogenetic classification and the unification of biology: 1st Smithsonian Botanical Symposium. Pl. Press (Washington) 4(2): 8-9.
39. Mori, S. A. 1992a. Botanists needed to defend biodiversity. Earth Summit Times 23: 4.
40. _. 1992b. Neotropical floristics and inventory: Who will do the work? Brittonia 44: 372-375.
41. _ & N. Lepsch-Cunha. 1995. The Lecythidaceae of a central Amazonian moist forest. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 75: 1-55.
42. _ & G. T. Prance. 1990. Lecythidaceae. Part 2, The zygomorphic-flowered New World genera (Couroupita, Corythophora, Bertholletia, Couratari, Eschweilera, & Lecythis) Fl. Neotrop. Monogr. 21. New York Bot. Gard., Bronx.
43. Morton, C. M., S. A. Mori, G. T. Prance, K. G. Karol & M. W. Chase. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of Lecythidaceae: A cladistic analysis using rbcL sequence and morphological data. Amer. J. Bot. 84: 530-540.
44. Nixon, K. C. & J. M. Carpenter. 2000. On the other "Phylogenetic Systematics." Cladistics 16: 298-318.
45. Palm, M. E. 2001. Systematics and the impact of invasive fungi on agriculture in the United States. BioScience 51: 141-147.
46. Palmer, M. W., G. L. Wade & P. Neal. 1995. Standards for the writing of floras. BioScience 45: 339-345.
47. Prance, G. T. 1977. Floristic inventory of the tropics: Where do we stand? Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 64: 659-684.
48. _. 1985. Monographing in the 1980s. Aliso 11: 231-242.
49. _. 1987. Biogeography of Neotropical plants. Pp. 46-65 in T. C. Whitmore & G. T. Prance (eds.), Biogeography and Quaternary history in tropical America. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
50. _. 2001. Discovering the plant world. Taxon 50(2): 345-359.
51. _ & S. A. Mori. 1998. Pollination and dispersal of Neotropical Lecythidaceae. Pp. 13-27 in H. C. F. Hopkins, C. R. Huxley, C. M. Pannell, G. T. Prance & F. White, The biological monograph: The importance of field studies and functional syndromes for taxonomy and evolution of tropical plants. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
52. Pruski, J. F. 1996. Compositae of the Guayana Highland, XI. Tuberculocarpus gen. nov. and some other Ecliptinae (Heliantheae). Novon 6: 404-418.
53. Raven, P. H. 1988. Tropical floristics tomorrow. Taxon 37: 549-560.
54. Rico, M. L. 2000. A new name for Albizia elegans (Ducke) L. Rico. Kew Bull. 55: 404.
55. Robinson, H. & V. Funk. 2000. (1467) Proposal to conserve the name Wulffia against Tilesia (Asteraceae). Taxon 49: 569-570.
56. SA2000. 1994. Systematic Agenda 2000: Charting the Biosphere. Systematics Agenda 2000.
57. Savage, J. M. 1995. Systematics and the biodiversity crisis. BioScience 45: 673-679.
58. Schuh, R. T. 2000. Biological systematics: Principles and applications. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY.
59. Scotland, R. W. 2000. Are angiosperms firmly rooted? Taxon 49: 529-531.
60. Soltis, D. E., P. S. Soltis, M. W. Chase, M. E. Mort, D. C. Albach, M. Zanis, V. Savolainen, W. H. Hahn, S. B. Hoot, M. F. Fay, M. Axtell, S. M. Swensen, L. M. Prince, W. J. Kress, K. C. Nixon & J. S. Farris. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133: 381-461.
61. Stevens, P. F. 2001-. Angiosperm phylogeny website. Version 2. 〈http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/〉.
62. Struwe, L. & V. A. Albert. 1995. Floristics, cladistics, and classification: Three case studies in the Gentianales. Pp. 321-352 in J. Dransfield, M. J. E. Coode & D. A. Simpson (eds.), Plant diversity in Malesia III. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
63. _, M. Thiv, J. W. Kadereit, A. S.-R. Pepper, T. J. Motley, P. J. White, J. H. E. Rova, K. Potgieter & V. A. Albert. 1998. Saccifolium (Saccifoliaceae), an endemic of Sierra de la Neblina on the Brazilian-Venezuelan border, is related to a temperate-alpine lineage of Gentianaceae. Harvard Pap. Bot. 3: 199-214.
64. _, J. W. Kadereit, J. Klackenberg, S. Nilsson, M. Thiv, K. B. von Hagen & V. A. Albert. 2002. Systematics, character evolution, and biogeography of Gentianaceae, including a new tribal and subtribal classification. Pp. 21-309 in L. Struwe & and V. A. Albert (eds.), Gentianaceae: Systematics and natural history. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
65. Stuessy, T. E. 1975. The importance of revisionary studies in plant systematics. Sida 6: 104-113.
66. _. 2001. Taxon names are still not defined. Taxon 50: 185-186.
67. Thiv, M., L. Struwe, V. A. Albert & J. W. Kadereit. 1999. The phylogenetic relationships of Saccifolium bandeirae (Gentianaceae) reconsidered. Harvard Pap. Bot. 4: 519-526.
68. Thomas, W. W. 1999. Conservation and monographic research. Biodiv. & Conserv. 8: 1007-1015.
69. Wheeler, Q. D. 2001. Invited comment by participants of the 1st Smithsonian Botanical Symposium. Pl. Press (Washington) 4(2): 14.
70. Wilson, E. O. 1985. The biological diversity crisis: A challenge to science. Issues Sci. Technol. 2: 20-29.
71. _. 2000. A global biodiversity map. Science 289: 2279.
72. Wilson, H. D. 2001a. Informatics: New media and paths of data flow. Taxon 50: 381-388.
73. _. 2001b. Flowering plant gateway. Version 2.02. 〈http://www.csdl.tamu.edu/FLORA/newgate/cronang.htm〉.
74. Zander, R. H. 1998. Phylogenetic reconstruction: A critique. Taxon 47: 681-693.
75. Zhang, W. 1996. Phylogeny and classification of the bamboos (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) based on molecular and morphological data. Ph.D. diss., Iowa State Univ.
76. _ & L. G. Clark. 2000. Phylogeny and classification of the bamboos (Poaceae: Bambusoideae). Pp. 2: 35-42 in S. W. L. Jacobs & J. Everett, (eds.), Grasses, Systematics and Evolution. CSIRO, Melbourne.