Rate response of a closed-loop stimulation pacing system to changing preload and afterload conditions

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 26, Issue 7 I, 2003, Pages 1504-1510

  Cron, Thomas A ^a   Hilti, Patrick ^a   Schächinger, Hartmut ^a   Pouskoulas, Christos D ^a   Keller, Dagmar I ^a   Zaugg, Christian E ^a   Buser, Peter T ^a   Pfisterer, Matthias E ^a   Osswald, Stefan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Autonomic nervous system; Cardiac pacing; Closed loop stimulation; Rate response; Sensor principle; Tilt table testing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; BLOOD VOLUME; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HAND GRIP; HEAD TILTING; HEART AFTERLOAD; HEART MUSCLE CONTRACTILITY; HEART PACING; HEART PRELOAD; HEART RATE; HEART RHYTHM; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE; HEART STIMULATION; HUMAN; MALE; ORTHOSTATIC HYPOTENSION; SENSOR; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TACHYCARDIA; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0038608907     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.t01-1-00218.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Leung SK, Lau CP, Camm A. An overview of sensors: Ideal characteristics, sensor combination and automaticity. In KA Ellenbogen, GN Kay, BL Wilkoff BL (eds.): Clinical Cardiac Pacing and Defibrillation. Philadelphia, PA, W.B. Saunders Co., 2000, pp. 219-248.
2. Leung SK, Lau CP. Developments in sensor-driven pacing. Cardiol Clin 2000; 8:113-155.
3. Osswald S, Leiggener C, Buser P, et al. Benefits and limitations of rate adaptive pacing under laboratory and daily life conditions in patients with minute ventilation single chamber pacemakers. PACE 1996; 19:890-898.
4. Israel CW, Hohnloser SH. Current status of dual-sensor pacemaker systems for correction of chronotropic incompetence. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86(Suppl, 1):K86-K94.
5. Pichlmaier A, Braile D, Ebner E, et al. Autonomic nervous system controlled closed-loop cardiac pacing. PACE 1992; 15:1787-1791.
6. Schaldach M, Urbaszek A, Ströbel J, et al. Rate-adaptive pacing using a closed-loop, autonomic nervous system controlled pacemaker. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 3:22-32.
7. Schaldach M, Hutten H. Intracardiac impedance to determine activity in rate responsive pacing. PACE 1992; 15:1778-1786.
8. Osswald S, Cron T, Graedel C, et al. Closed-loop stimulation using intracardiac impedance as sensor principle: Correlation of right ventricular dP/dt max and intracardiac impedance during dobutamine stress test. PACE 2000; 23:1502-1508.
9. Witte J, Pichlmaier A, Ebner E, et al. ANS-controlled rate-adaptive pacing: A clinical evaluation. Eur J Cardiac Pacing Electrophysiol 1996; 6:53-59.
10. Hess N, Leiggener C, Cron T, et al. [Rate response of a new inotropysensing DDDR-pacemaker in comparison to minute-ventilation and activity-sensing pacemakers]. (abstract) Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1998; 128:27S.
11. Malinowski K. Interindividual comparison of different sensor principles for rate adaptive pacing. PACE 1998; 21:2209-2213.
12. 2 CLS/DR pacemaker. Biotronik GmbH & Co., Berlin, Germany.
13. Brignole M, Alboni P, Benditt D, et al. Task Force on Syncope, European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope. Eur Heart J 2001; 22:1256-1306.
14. Schachinger H, Weinbacher M, Kiss A, et al. Cardiovascular indices of peripheral and central sympathetic activation. Psychosom Med 2001; 63:788-796.
15. Bennett T, Sharma A, Sutton R, et al. Development of a rate adaptive pacemaker based on the maximum rate-of-rise of right ventricular pressure (RV dP/dt max). PACE 1992; 15:219-234.
16. Quinones MA, Gaasch WH, Alexander JK. Influences of acute changes in preload, afterload, contractile state and heart rate on ejection and isovolumic indices of myocardial contractility in man. Circulation 1976; 53:293-302.
17. Bennett T, Olson W. Effects of postural stress on several rate-responsive pacing modes in conscious dogs. (abstract) PACE 1987; 10:645.
18. Reynolds D, Turner S, Bridges S, et al. Right ventricular pressure parameters in patients with normal and reduced cardiac function. (abstract) PACE 1987; 10:733.
19. Martinelli FM, Nishioka SA, Lopes H, et al. Neurohumoral behavior in recipients of cardiac pacemakers controlled by a closed-loop autonomic nervous system-driven sensor. PACE 2000; 23:1778-1782.
20. Huber T, Griesbach L, Kraetschmer H. Closed loop stimulation: A new therapeutic option in cardioinhibitory malignant vasovagal syndrome. (abstract) PACE 2001; 24:617.