Benefits and limitations of rate adaptive pacing under laboratory and daily life conditions in patients with minute ventilation single chamber pacemakers

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 890-898

  Osswald, Stefan ^a   Leiggener, Christoph ^a   Buser, Peter T ^a   Pfisterer, Matthias E ^a   Burckhardt, Dieter ^a   Burkart, Felix ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

minute ventilation; role adaptive pacing

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE TOLERANCE; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART ATRIUM PACEMAKER; HEART ATRIUM PACING; HEART VENTRICLE PACING; HEMODYNAMICS; HOLTER MONITORING; HUMAN; LUNG MINUTE VOLUME; MALE; SICK SINUS SYNDROME;

AGED; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; CARDIAC PACING, ARTIFICIAL; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART BLOCK; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SICK SINUS SYNDROME;

EID: 0030006541     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03384.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Benditt DG, Mianulli M, Fetter J, et al. Single-chamber cardiac pacing with activity-initiated chronotropic response: Evaluation by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Circulation 1987;75: 184-191.
2. Iwase M, Hatano K, Saito F, et al. Evaluation by exercise Doppler echocardiography of maintenance of cardiac output during ventricular pacing with or without chronotropic response. Am J Cardiol 1989;63:934-938.
3. Gammage M, Schofield S, Rankin I, et al. Benefit of single setting rate responsive ventricular pacing compared with fixed rate demand pacing in elderly patients. PACE 1991;14:174-180.
4. Humen DP, Kostuk WJ, Klein CJ. Activity-sensing, rate-responsive pacing: Improvement in myocardial performance with exercise. PACE 1985;8: 52-59.
5. Lau CP, Butrous GS, Ward DE, et al. Comparison of exercise performance of six rate-adaptive right ventricular cardiac pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 1989;63:833-838.
6. Lau CP, Antoniou A, Ward DE, et al. Reliability of minute ventilation as a parameter for rate responsive pacing. PACE 1989;12:321-330.
7. Vai F, Bonnet JL, Ritter P, et al. Relationship between heart rate and minute ventilation, tidal volume and respiratory rate during brief and low level exercise. PACE 1988;11:1860-1865.
8. Barold SS, Sanders RS. Rate-adaptive cardiac pacing: Cost versus technology versus patient benefit, (editorial) Am Heart J 1993;125:1828-1834.
9. Lamas GA, Estes NM, Schneller S, et al. Does dual-chamber or atrial pacing prevent atrial fibrillation? The need for a randomized controlled trial. PACE 1992;15:1109-1113.
10. Osswald S, Kiowski W, Leiggener C, et al. Adjustment of heart rate response of activity-sensing pacemakers by an exercise protocol mimicking daily activities. Eur JCPE 1993;3:269-277.
11. Lau CP, Antoniou A, Ward DE, et al. Limitations of rate response of an activity-sensing rate-responsive pacemaker to different forms of activity. PACE 1988;11:141-150.
12. Lau CP, Rushby J, Leigh-Jones M, et al. Symptomatology and quality of life in patients with rate-responsive pacemakers: A double-blind, randomized, crossover study. Clin Cardiol 1989;12: 505-512.
13. Candinas RA, Gloor HO, Amann EW, et al. Activity-sensing rate responsive versus conventional fixed-rate pacing: A comparison of rate behavior and patient well-being during routine daily exercise. PACE 1991;13:204-213.
14. Lau CP, Wong CK, Tai YT, et al. Ventricular rate-adaptive pacing in the elderly. Eur Heart J 1992;13:908-913.
15. McMeekin JD, Lautner D, Hanson S, et al. Importance of heart rate response during exercise in patients using atrioventricular synchronous and ventricular pacemakers. PACE 1990;13:59-68.
16. Benditt DG, Milstein S, Buetikofer J, et al. Sensor-triggered, rate-variable cardiac: pacing. Ann Intern Med 1987;107:714-724.
17. Ausubel K, Steingart R, Shimshi M, et al. Maintenance of exercise stroke volume during ventricular versus atrial synchronous pacing: Role of contractility. Circulation 1985;72:1037-1043.
18. Jutzy RV, Florio J, Isaeff DM, et al. Comparative evaluation of rate modulated dual chamber and VVIR pacing. PACE 1990;13:1838-1846.
19. Sulke N, Chambers J, Dritsas A, et al. A randomized double-blind crossover comparison of four rato-responsive pacing modes. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:696-706.
20. Lascault G, Frank Riwa T, et al. Comparison of DDD and "VVI-R like" pacing during moderate exercise: Echo-Doppler study. Eur Heart J 1992;13:914-917.
21. Shefer A, Rozenman Y, Ben David Y, et al. Left ventricular function during physiological cardiac pacing: Relation to rate, pacing mode, and underlying myocardial disease. PACE 1987;10:315-325.
22. Libert HP, O'Donoghue S, Tullner WF, et al. Pacemaker syndrome in activity-responsive VVIR-pacing. Am J Cardiol 1989;64:124-126.
23. Lau CP, Camm AJ. Role of left ventricular function and Doppler-derived variables in predicting hemodynamic benefits of rate-responsive pacing. Am J Cardiol 1988;62:906-911.
24. Sedney MI, Weijers E, van-der-Wall EE, et al. Short-term and long-term changes of left ventricular volumes during rate-adaptive and single-rate pacing. PACE 1989;12:1863-1868.
25. Grines CL, Bashore TM, Boudoulas H, et al. Functional abnormalities in isolated left bundle branch block - the effect interventricular asynchrony. Circulation 1989;79:845-853.
26. Askenazi J, Alexander JH, Koenigsberg D, et al. Alteration of left ventricular performance by left bundle branch block simulated with atrioventricular sequential pacing. Am J Cardiol 1984;53: 99-104.
27. Gallik DM, Guidry GW, Mahmarian JJ, et al. Comparison of ventricular function in atrial rate adaptive versus dual chamber rate adaptive pacing during exercise. PACE 1994;17:179-185.