Comparison of peach and Arabidopsis genomic sequences: Fragmentary conservation of gene neighborhoods

Genome

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 268-276

  Georgi, Laura L ^a   Wang, Ying ^a,c   Reighard, Gregory L ^a   Mao, Long ^b,d   Wing, Rod A ^b,e   Abbott, Albert G ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^d NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Arizona Genomics Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Conserved microsynteny; Genome evolution

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; BASE SEQUENCE; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DNA, PLANT; EXONS; GENE ORDER; GENES, PLANT; GENOME, PLANT; INTRONS; PLANT PROTEINS; POLYMORPHISM, RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH; PRUNUS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); EMBRYOPHYTA; PRUNUS PERSICA;

EID: 0038586491     PISSN: 08312796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/g03-004     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abbott, A., Georgi, L., Yvergniaux, D., Iñigo, M., Sosinski, B., Wang, Y., Blenda, A., and Reighard, G. 2002. Peach: the model genome for Rosaceae. Acta Hort. 575: 145-155.
2. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schäffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D.J. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSIBLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389-3402.
3. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. 2000. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature (London), 408: 796-815.
4. Asíns, M.J., Monforte, A.J., Mestre, P.F., and Carbonell, E.A. 1999. Citrus and Prunus copia-like retrotransposons. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 503-510.
5. Baird, W.V., Estager, A.S., and Wells, J.K. 1994. Estimating nuclear DNA content in peach and related diploid species using laser flow cytometry and DNA hybridization. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119: 1312-1316.
6. Barry, G.F. 2001. The use of the Monsanto draft rice genome sequence in research. Plant Physiol. 125: 1164-1165.
7. Bevan, M., Mayer, K., White, O., Eisen, J.A., Preuss, D., Bureau, T., Salzberg, S.L., and Mewes, H.W. 2001. Sequence and analysis of the Arabidopsis genome. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4: 105-110.
8. Brendel, V., and Zhu, W. 2002. Computational modelling of gene structure in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 49-58.
9. Bureau, T.E., Ronald, P.C., and Wessler, S.R. 1996. A computer-based systematic survey reveals the predominance of small inverted-repeat elements in wild-type rice genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93: 8524-8529.
10. Gale, M.D., and Devos, K.M. 1998. Comparative genetics in the grasses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95: 1971-1974.
11. Georgi, L.L., Wang, Y., Yvergniaux, D., Ormsbee, T., Iñigo, M., Reighard, G.L., and Abbott, A.G. 2002. Construction of a BAC library and its application to the identification of simple sequence repeats in peach (Prunus persica [L.] Batsch). Theor. Appl. Genet. 105: 1151-1158.
12. Goff, S., Ricke, D., Lan, T., Presting, G., Wang, R., et al. 2002. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sative L. ssp. japonica). Science (Washington, D.C.) 296: 92-100.
13. Grant, D., Cregan, P., and Shoemaker, R.C. 2000. Genome organization in dicots. Genome duplication in Arabidopsis and synteny between soybean and Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97: 4168-4173.
14. Hardtke, C.S., and Berleth, T. 1998. The Arabidopsis gene MONOPTEROS encodes a transcription factor medating embryo axis formation and vascular development. EMBO J. 17: 1405-1411.
15. Hirochika, H., and Hirochika, R. 1993. Tyl-copia group retro-transposons as ubiquitous components of plant genomes. Jpn. J. Genet. 68: 35-46.
16. Jankowsky, E., and Jankowsky, A. 2000. The DExH/D protein family database. Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 333-334.
17. Karlin, S., Campbell, A.M., and Mrázek, J. 1998. Comparative DNA analysis across diverse genomes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 32: 185-225.
18. Kim, J., Harter, K., and Theologis, A. 1997. Protein-protein interactions among the Aux/IAA proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94: 11786-11791.
19. Ku, H.-M., Vision, T., Liu, J., and Tanksley, S.D. 2000. Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabidopsis genomes: large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97: 9121-9126.
20. Ku, H.-M., Liu, J., Doganlar, S., and Tanksley, S.D. 2001. Exploitation of Arabidopsis-tomato synteny to construct a high-resolution map of the ovate-containing region in tomato chromosome 2. Genome, 44: 470-475.
21. Lee, J.M., Grant, D., Vallejos, C.E., and Shoemaker, R.C. 2001, Genome organization in dicots. II. Arabidopsis as a "bridging species" to resolve genome evolution events among legumes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103: 765-773.
22. Liu, H., Sachidanandam, R., and Stein, L. 2001. Comparative genomics between rice and Arabidopsis shows scant collinearity in gene order. Genome Res. 11: 2020-2026.
23. Lu, Z.X, Sosinski, B., Reighard, G.L., Baird, W.V., and Abbott, A.G. 1998. Construction of a linkage map in peach rootstocks [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.], and localization of genes conferring resistance to root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica). Genome, 41: 199-207.
24. Magallón, S., Crane, P.R., and Herendeen, P.S. 1999. Phylogenetic pattern, diversity, and diversification of eudicots. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 86: 297-372.
25. Mayer, K, Murphy, G., Tarchini, R., Wambutt, R., Volckaert, G., et al. 2001. Conservation of microstructure between a sequenced region of the genome of rice and mutiple segments of the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Res. 11: 1167-1174.
26. Mao, L., Begum, D., Goff, S.A., and Wing, R.A. 2001. Sequence and analysis of the tomato JOINTLESS locus. Plant Physiol. 126: 1331-1340.
27. O'Neill, C.M., and Bancroft, I. 2000. Comparative physical mapping of segments of the genome of Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra that are homoeologous to sequenced regions of chromosomes 4 and 5 of Arabidopsis thaliana. 2000. Plant J. 23:233-243.
28. Pertea, M. and. Salzberg, S.L. 2002. Computational gene finding in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 39-48.
29. Puoti, A., and Kimble, J. 2000. The hermaphrodite sperm-oocyte switch requires the Caenorhabditis elegans homologs of PRP2 and PRP22. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97: 3276-3281.
30. Rosen, S., and Skaletsky, H.J. 1998. Primer3. Code available at http://www.genome.wi.mit.edu/genome_software/other/primer3.html.
31. Rossberg, M., Theres, K., Acarkan, A., Herrero, R., Schmitt, T., Schumacher, K., Schmitz, G., and Schmidt, R. 2001. Comparative sequence analysis reveals extensive microcolinearity in the lateral suppressor regions of the tomato, Arabidopsis, and Capsella genomes. Plant Cell, 13: 979-988.
32. Sanjuán, R., and Matín, I. 2001. Tracing the origin of the compensasome: evolutionary history of DEAH helicase and MYST acetyltransferase gene families. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:330-343.
33. Schneider, S., and Schwer, B. 2001. Functional domains of the yeast splicing factor Prp22p. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 21184-21191.
34. Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P.S., Chase, M.W., Mort, M.E., Albach, D.C., et al. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL and atpB sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133: 381-461.
35. Sosinski, B., Gannavarapu, M., Hager, L.D., Beck, L.E., King, G.J., Ryder, C.D., Rajapakse, S., Baird, W.V., Ballard, R.E., and Abbott, A.G. 2000. Characterization of microsatellite markers in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.]. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101: 421-428.
36. Tarchini, R., Biddle, P., Wineland, R., Tingey, S., and Rafalski, A. 2000. The complete sequence of 340 kb of DNA around the rice Adh1-Adh2 region reveals interrupted colinearity with maize chromosome 4. Plant Cell, 12: 381-391.
37. Tikhonov, A.P., SanMiguel, P.J., Nakajima, Y., Gorenstein, N.M., Bennetzen, J.L., and Avramova, Z. 1999. Colinearity and its exceptions in orthologous adh regions of maize and sorghum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96:7409-7414.
38. Ulmasov, T., Hagen, G., and Guilfoyle, T.J. 1999. Activation and repression of transcription by auxin-response factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96:5844-5849.
39. van Dodeweerd, A.-M., Hall, C.R., Bent, E.G., Johnson, S.J., Bevan, M.W., and Bancroft, I. 1999. Identification and analysis of homoeologous segments of the genomes of rice and Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome, 42: 887-892.
40. Wang, Y., Georgi, L., Reighard, G.L., Scorza, R., and Abbott, A.G. 2002. Genetic mapping the evergreen gene in peach [Prunus persica (L) Batsch]. J. Hered. 93: 352-358.
41. Wang, Y., Georgi, L.L., Zhebentyayeva, T.N., Reighard, G.L., Scorza, R., and Abbott, A.G. 2002. High throughput targeted SSR marker development in peach (Prunus persica). Genome, 45: 319-328.
42. Yamamoto, E., and Knap H.T. 2001. Soybean receptor-like protein kinase genes: paralogous divergence of a gene family. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 1522-1531.
43. Yu, J., Hu, S., Wang, J., Wong, G.K., Lin, S., et al. 2002. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp indica). Science (Washington, D.C.) 296: 79-92.
44. Yu, Y. 2000. Development and application of genomics tools for analysis of grass genome. Ph.D. dissertation, Clemson University, Clemson, S.C. pp. 22-45.