Weighted least squares fitting using ordinary least squares algorithms

Psychometrika

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 251-266

  Kiers, Henk A L ^a  

^a Department of Psychology ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Algorithms; Alternating least squares; Majorization; Matrix approximation; Maximum likelihood estimation; Missing data; Weighted least squares

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031517826     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02295279     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bailey, R. A., & Gower, J. C. (1990). Approximating a symmetric matrix. Psychometrika, 55, 665-675.
2. Bijleveld, C. & de Leeuw, J. (1991). Fitting longitudinal reduced rank regression models by alternating least squares. Psychometrika, 56, 443-447.
3. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
4. Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62-83.
5. Carroll, J. D., De Soete, G., & Pruzansky, S. (1989). Fitting of the latent class model via iteratively reweighted least squares candecomp with nonnegativity constraints. In R. Coppi & S. Bolasco (Eds.), Multiway data analysis (pp. 463-472). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
6. Cliff, N. (1966). Orthogonal rotation to congruence. Psychometrika, 31, 33-42.
7. Commandeur, J. J. F. (1991). Matching configurations. Leiden: DSWO Press.
8. de Leeuw, J. & Heiser, W. (1980). Multidimensional scaling with restrictions on the configuration. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.), Multivariate analysis V (pp. 501-522). Amsterdam: North Holland.
9. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1-38.
10. Gabriel, K. R., & Zamir, S. (1979). Lower rank approximation of matrices by least squares with any choice of weights. Technometrics, 21, 489-498.
11. Gifi, A. (1990). Nonlinear multivariate analysis. Chichester: Wiley.
12. Green, B. F. (1952). The orthogonal approximation of an oblique structure in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 17, 429-440.
13. Harman, H. H., & Jones, W. H. (1966). Factor analysis by minimizing residuals (Minres). Psychometrika, 31, 351-368.
14. Harshman, R. A. (1978, August). Models for analysis of asymmetrical relationships among N objects or stimuli. Paper presented at the First Joint Meeting of the Psychometric Society and the Society for Mathematical Psychology, Hamilton, Ontario.
15. Harshman, R. A., Green, P. E., Wind, Y., & Lundy, M. E. (1982). A model for the analysis of asymmetric data in marketing research, Marketing Science, 1, 205-242.
16. Harshman, R. A., & Lundy, M. E. (1984). The PARAFAC model for three-way factor analysis and multidimensional scaling. In H. G. Law, C. W. Snyder, J. A. Hattie, & R. P. McDonald (Eds.), Research methods for multimode data analysis (pp. 122-215). New York: Praeger.
17. Heiser, W. J. (1987). Correspondence Analysis with least absolute residuals. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 5, 337-356.
18. Heiser, W. J. (1995). Convergent computation by iterative majorization: theory and applications in multidimensional data analysis. In W. J. Krzanowski (Ed.), Recent advances in descriptive multivariate analysis (pp. 157-189). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8 User's guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
20. Kiers, H. A. L. (1989). An alternating least squares algorithm for fitting the two- and three-way DEDICOM model and the IDIOSCAL model. Psychometrika, 54, 515-521.
21. Kiers, H. A. L. (1990). Majorization as a tool for optimizing a class of matrix functions. Psychometrika, 55, 417-428.
22. Kiers, H. A. L. (1993). An alternating least squares algorithm for PARAFAC2 and DEDICOM3. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 16, 103-118.
23. Kiers, H. A. L., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (1992). Minimization of a class of matrix trace functions by means of refined majorization. Psychometrika, 57, 371-382.
24. Kiers, H. A. L., ten Berge, J. M. F., Takane, Y., & de Leeuw, J. (1990). A generalization of Takane's algorithm for DEDICOM. Psychometrika, 55, 151-158.
25. Takane, Y. (1985). Diagonal Estimation in DEDICOM. Proceedings of the 1985 Annual Meeting of the Behaviormetric Society (pp. 100-101). Sapporo, Japan: Behaviormetric Society.
26. ten Berge, J. M. F., & Kiers, H. A. L. (1989). Fitting the off-diagonal DEDICOM model in the least-squares sense by a generalization of the Harman & Jones MINRES procedure of factor analysis. Psychometrika, 54, 333-337.
27. ten Berge, J. M. F., & Kiers, H. A. L. (1993). An alternating least squares method for the weighted approximation of a symmetric matrix. Psychometrika, 58, 115-118.
28. ten Berge, J. M. F., Kiers, H. A. L., & Commandeur, J. J. F. (1993). Orthogonal Procrustes rotation for matrices with missing values. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 46, 119-134.
29. Verboon, P. (1994). A robust approach to nonlinear multivariate analysis. Leiden: DSWO Press.
30. Verboon, P., & Heiser, W. J. (1992). Resistant orthogonal Procrustes analysis. Journal of Classification, 9, 237-256.
31. Verboon, P., & Heiser, W. J. (1994). Resistant lower rank approximation of matrices by iterative majorization. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 18, 457-467.