Pressure-tuning the effective diffusivity of near-critical reaction mixtures in mesoporous catalysts

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 42, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 2639-2643

  Arunajatesan, Venu ^a,b   Wilson, Kimberly A ^a,c   Subramaniam, Bala ^a  

^a University of Kansas   (United States)

^b Degussa Corp   (United States)

^c INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATION ENERGY; CATALYSTS; DIFFUSION; ISOMERIZATION; MESOPOROUS MATERIALS;

PRESSURE-TUNING;

MIXTURES;

1 HEXENE; ALUMINUM DERIVATIVE; PLATINUM;

CATALYST; MIXTURE; POROSITY; PRESSURE; SUPERCRITICAL FLUID;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CATALYST; CHEMICAL REACTION; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; DIFFUSION; ENERGY; FIXED BED REACTOR; ISOMERISM; POROSITY; PRESSURE; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE;

EID: 0038548379     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie020835d     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Savage, P. E.; Gopalan, S.; Mizan, T. L.; Martino, C. J.; Brock, E. E. Reactions at Supercritical Conditions; Applications and Fundamentals. AIChE J. 1995, 41, 1723.
2. Hyde, J. R.; Licence, P.; Carter, D.; Poliakoff M. Continuous Catalytic Reactions in Supercritical Fluids. Appl. Catal., A 2001, 222, 119.
3. Subramaniam, B. Enhancing the Stability of Porous Catalysts with Supercritical Reaction Media. Appl. Catal., A 2001, 212, 199.
4. Dogu, T. Diffusion and Reaction in Catalyst Pellets with Bidisperse Pore Size Distribution. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1998, 37, 2158.
5. 2 with Activated Soda. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1996, 51, 2201.
6. Kolaczkowski, S. T.; Ullah, U. Measurement of effective diffusivities using a spinning basket reactor. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1989, 44, 2843.
7. Xu, J.; Froment, G. F. Methane Steam Reforming: II. Diffusional Limitations and Reactor Simulation. AIChE J. 1989, 35, 97.
8. Eaton, A.; Bukur, D. B.; Akgerman, A. Molecular Diffusion Coefficients and Effective Diffusivities of 1-Octene in Supercritical Ethane in Relation to Fischer - Tropsch Synthesis. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1995, 40, 1293.
9. Levenspiel, O. Chemical Reaction Engineering; John Wiley: New York, 1999.
10. 3 Catalyst: The Dramatic Effects of Feed Peroxides on Catalyst Activity. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1996, 51, 2369.
11. Clark, M. C.; Subramaniam, B. Kinetics on a Supported Catalyst at Supercritical, Nondeactivating Conditions. AIChE J. 1999, 45, 1559.
12. Clark, M. C. Enhancing the Activity of Acidic Catalysts with Supercritical Reaction Media, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 1998.
13. 3 Catalyst at Subcritical and Supercritical Conditions: Temperature, Pressure and Solvent Effects on Catalyst Coking, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 1990.
14. Schmidt, B. Reaktionstechnische Untersuchungen zur Isomerisierung von Buten-(1) an einem Schalenkontakt bei hohem Druck. Master's Thesis, Friedrich-Alexander- Universität Erlangen-Nurnberg, 1988.
15. Dadyburjor, D. Constant-Coke Arrhenius Plots: A Diagnostic Tool. J. Catal. 1983, 79, 222.
16. Gunn, D. J. Diffusion and Chemical Reaction in Catalysis and Absorption. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1967, 22, 1439.
17. Satterfield, C. N. Heterogeneous Catalysis in Industrial Practice; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1991.
18. Renkin, E. M. Filtration, Diffusion and Sieving through Porous Cellulose Membranes. J. Gen. Physiol. 1954, 38, 225.
19. Chantong, A.; Massoth, F. E. Restrictive Diffusion in Aluminas. AIChE J. 1983, 29, 725.
20. Seo, G.; Massoth, F. E. Effect of Temperature and Pressure on Restrictive Diffusion of Solutes in Aluminas. AIChE J. 1985, 31,494.
21. Bird, R. B.; Stewart, W. E.; Lightfoot, E. N. Transport Phenomena; John Wiley: New York, 1971.