Quantum imaging, quantum lithography and the uncertainty principle

Fortschritte der Physik

Volumn 51, Issue 4-5, 2003, Pages 487-497

  Shih, Yanhua ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038518568     PISSN: 00158208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prop.200310066     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
2. T. B. Pittman, Y. H. Shih, D. V. Strekalov, and A. V. Sergienko, Phys. Rev. A 52, R3429 (1995). D. V. Strekalov, A. V. Sergienko, D. N. Klyshko, and Y. H. Shih, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3600 (1995).
3. T. B. Pittman, Y. H. Shih, D. V. Strekalov, and A. V. Sergienko, Phys. Rev. A 52, R3429 (1995). D. V. Strekalov, A. V. Sergienko, D. N. Klyshko, and Y. H. Shih, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3600 (1995).
4. Klyshko D.N. Photon and Nonlinear Optics (Gordon and Breach Science, New York, 1988). A. Yariv, Quantum Electronics (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1989). "Spontaneous Parametric Down Conversion" was called "Spontaneous Fluorescence" and "Spontaneous Scattering" by the pioneer workers, for example, S. E. Harries, M. K. Oshman, and R. L. Beyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 732 (1967).
5. Klyshko D.N. Photon and Nonlinear Optics (Gordon and Breach Science, New York, 1988). A. Yariv, Quantum Electronics (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1989). "Spontaneous Parametric Down Conversion" was called "Spontaneous Fluorescence" and "Spontaneous Scattering" by the pioneer workers, for example, S. E. Harries, M. K. Oshman, and R. L. Beyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 732 (1967).
6. Klyshko D.N. Photon and Nonlinear Optics (Gordon and Breach Science, New York, 1988). A. Yariv, Quantum Electronics (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1989). "Spontaneous Parametric Down Conversion" was called "Spontaneous Fluorescence" and "Spontaneous Scattering" by the pioneer workers, for example, S. E. Harries, M. K. Oshman, and R. L. Beyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 732 (1967).
7. In type-I SPDC, signal and idler are both ordinary (or extraordinary) rays of the SPDC crystal; however, in type-II SPDC the signal and idler are orthogonally polarized, i.e., one is ordinary and the other is extraordinary.
8. K. R. Popper, Zur Kritik der Ungenauigkeitsrelationen, Naturwissenschaften 22(48), 807 (1934). K. R. Popper, From the Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery, edited by E. I. Bitsakis and N. Tambakis (Gutenberg Publishing, 1984). K. Popper, Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics, edited by W. W. Bartly (Hutchinson, London, 1983), p. 28. Amongst the most notable opponents to the "Copenhagen School" were Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen, de Broglie, Landé, and Karl Popper. One may not agree with Popper's philosophy (EPR classical reality as well) but once again, Popper's thought experiment raises yet another fundamental issue in regard to the foundations of quantum theory.
9. K. R. Popper, Zur Kritik der Ungenauigkeitsrelationen, Naturwissenschaften 22(48), 807 (1934). K. R. Popper, From the Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery, edited by E. I. Bitsakis and N. Tambakis (Gutenberg Publishing, 1984). K. Popper, Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics, edited by W. W. Bartly (Hutchinson, London, 1983), p. 28. Amongst the most notable opponents to the "Copenhagen School" were Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen, de Broglie, Landé, and Karl Popper. One may not agree with Popper's philosophy (EPR classical reality as well) but once again, Popper's thought experiment raises yet another fundamental issue in regard to the foundations of quantum theory.
10. K. R. Popper, Zur Kritik der Ungenauigkeitsrelationen, Naturwissenschaften 22(48), 807 (1934). K. R. Popper, From the Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery, edited by E. I. Bitsakis and N. Tambakis (Gutenberg Publishing, 1984). K. Popper, Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics, edited by W. W. Bartly (Hutchinson, London, 1983), p. 28. Amongst the most notable opponents to the "Copenhagen School" were Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen, de Broglie, Landé, and Karl Popper. One may not agree with Popper's philosophy (EPR classical reality as well) but once again, Popper's thought experiment raises yet another fundamental issue in regard to the foundations of quantum theory.
11. T. B. Pittman, D. V. Strekalov, A. Migdall, M. H. Rubin, A. V. Sergienko, and Y. H. Shih, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1917 (1996).
12. Y. H. Shih, "Two-Photon Entanglement and Quantum Reality", in Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, edited by B. Bederson and H. Walther (Academic Press, Cambridge, 1997).
13. M. H. Rubin, D. N. Klyshko, and Y. H. Shih, Phys. Rev. A 50, 5122 (1994).
14. A. V. Sergienko and Y. H. Shih, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, Opt. Phys. 12, 859 (1995).
15. Y. H. Shih and A. V. Sergienko, Phys. Rev. A 50, 2564 (1994).
16. Anne Eisenberg, New York Times, September 20 (2001).
17. A. N. Boto et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2733 (2000).
18. D'Angelo, M. V. Chekhova, and Y. H. Shih, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001).
19. See classical optics textbooks, for example, E. Hecht, Optics, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1989).
20. D. V. Strekalov, A. V. Sergienko, D. N. Klyshko, and Y. H. Shih, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3600 (1995).
21. T. E. Keller, M. H. Rubin, Y. H. Shih, and L. A. Wu, Phys. Rev. A 57, 2076 (1998).
22. x = a · (h/a) = h.
23. "Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Teleportation", in: Quantum Theory Centenary, Annalen der Physik Vol. 10, edited by C. Thosmen (Wiley-VCH Publisher, 2000).
24. "Quantum Entanglement: from Popper's Experiment to Quantum Eraser", in Festschrift in Honor of Marlan O. Scully, Optics Communications, Vol. 179, edited by W. P. Schleich (North-Holland Publisher, 2000).
25. "Two-Photon Entanglement and Quantum Reality", in: Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, edited by B. Bederson and H. Walther (Academic Press, Cambridge, 1997).