The Effect of Interactive Television Courses on Student Satisfaction

Journal of Education for Business

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 164-168

  Anderson, Lorraine P ^a   Banks, Steven R ^a   Leary, Paul A ^a  

^a MARSHALL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038508747     PISSN: 08832323     EISSN: 19403356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08832320209599066     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Anderson, L. P., 2000. Interactive televised instruction: Factors that influence student evaluations of business courses. UMI Microform, 9987936
2. Biner, P. M., 1993. The development of an instrument to measure student attitudes toward televised courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 7 (1): 62–73.
3. Centra, J. A., 1993. Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness, San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
4. Clow, K. E., 1999. Interactive distance learning: Impact on student course evaluations. Journal of Marketing Education, 21 (2): 97–106.
5. Derry, J. O., Seibert, W. F., Starry, A. R., Van Horn, J. W., and Wright, G. L., 1974. Purdue instructor and course appraisal: The cafeteria system, Lafayette, IN: Purdue Research Foundation.
6. Egan, M. W., Welch, M., Page, B., and Sebastian, J., 1992. Learners' perceptions of instructional delivery systems: Conventional and television. The American Journal of Distance Education, 6 (2): 47–55.
7. Geary, D. J., 1998. Perceptions of instructor-student interaction as a reason for persistence in two-way audio & visual distance education. UMI Microform, 9841820
8. Gunawardena, C. N., 1992. Changing faculty roles for audiographics and online teaching. The American Journal of Distance Education, 6 (3): 58–71.
9. Hegge, M., 1993. Interactive television presentation style and teaching materials. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 24 (1): 39–42.
10. Johnson, K. A., 1998. Student attitudes and perceived learning effectiveness of courses offered in the satellite television mode of instructional delivery at the U.S. Army Logistics Management College. UMI Microform, 9917747
11. Keegan, D., 1986. The foundations of distance education, London: Croom Helm.
12. Kirkpatrick, D. L., 1967. “ Evaluation of training ”. In Training and development handbook, Edited by: Craig, R. L., and Bittel, L. R., New York: McGraw Hill.
13. Kochman, A. F., 1998. An investigation of differences in participant outcomes resulting from the use of interactive televised distance learning. UMI Microform, 9907752
14. Krathwohl, D. R., 1993. Methods of educational and social science research, New York: Longman.
15. Miller, J. W., McKenna, M. C., and Ramsey, P., 1992. An evaluation of student content learning and affective perceptions of a two-way interactive video learning experience, Statesboro, GA: Georgia Southern University.
16. Ritchie, H., and Newby, T. J., 1989. Classroom lecture/discussion vs. live televised instruction: A comparison of effects on student performance, attitude. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3 (3): 8–17.
17. Russell, T. L., 1999. The “No Significant Difference Phenomenon” [On-line]. Available: http://cuda.teleeducation.nb.ca/nosignificantd-ifference/
18. SAS. 1988. Statisical Analysis System SAS/STAT user's guide, Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
19. Seay, R. A., and Milkman, M. I., 1994. Interactive television instruction: An assessment of student performance and attitudes in an upper division accounting course. Issues in Accounting Education, Spring 94, 9 (1): 80–96.
20. Silvernail, D. L., and Johnson, J. L., 1990. The impact of interactive televised instruction on college student achievement and attitudes: A controlled experiment. International Journal of Instructional Media, 17 (1): 1–8.
21. Silvernail, D. L., and Johnson, J. L., 1992. The impact of interactive televised instruction on student evaluations of their instructors. Educational Technology, 32 (6): 47–50.
22. Thomerson, J. D., 1995. Student perceptions of the affective experiences encountered in distance learning courses. UMI Microform, 9531182
23. Wheeler, C., and Batchelder, A., 1996. The instructional practices of televised distance education at Northern Arizona University. Education, 117 (2): 172–180.
24. Zarghami, F., 1998. Constructs that contribute to student satisfaction for participating in graduate level courses delivered by full motion interactive fiber optic communication network. UMI Microform, 9911661