Interactive distance learning: Impact on student course evaluations

Journal of Marketing Education

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 97-105

  Clow, Kenneth E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007050629     PISSN: 02734753     EISSN: 15526550     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0273475399212003     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Barker, Randolph T., and Charles L. Holley. 1996. Interactive distance learning: Perspective and thoughts. Business Communication Quarterly59 (December): 88-97.
2. Bland, Kay P., Gary R. Morrison, and Steven M. Ross. 1992. Student attitudes toward learning link: A distance education project. Annual Mid-South Educational Research Association, 11-13 November.
3. Comeaux, Patricia. 1995. The impact of interactive distance learning network on classroom communication. Communication Education44 (October): 353-361.
4. Dillon, C., H. Hengst, and D. Zoller. 1989. Instructional strategies, distance education and student involvement. Fifth Annual Conference on Teaching at a Distance, 163-167.
5. Heiens, Richard A., and Deborah B. Hulse. 1996. Two-way interactive television: An emerging technology for university level business school instruction. Journal of Education for Business72 (2): 74-78.
6. Hinton, Samuel, and Sam O. Oleka. 1996. College students' assessment of teaching by television. Annual Mid-South Educational Research Association, 6-8 November.
7. Holland, Maurita P. 1996. Collaborative technologies in inter-university instruction. Journal of the American Society for Information Science47 (11): 857-862.
8. Massy, W. F., and R. Zemsky. 1996. Information technology and academic productivity. Educom Review31 (1): 12-14.
9. May, Bruce E. 1997. Curriculum internationalization and distance learning: convergence of necessity and technology. Journal of Teaching in International Business9 (1): 35-50.
10. McClenahan, John S. 1997. Industry Week246 (21 July): 19-20. Available from the Internet athttp://www.mba.degree.
11. Opitz, Margaret. 1996. Interactive distance learning: Implications for the classroom teacher. Clearing House69 (6): 325-326.
12. Stiegel, Elbert, Joanne G. Jennings, Jack Conklin, and Shelly A. Napoletano Flynn. 1998. Distance learning in social work education: Results and implications of a national survey. Journal of Social Work Education34 (1): 71-81.
13. Thyer, Bruce A., Thomas Artelt, Martha K. Markward, and Cheryl Dozier. 1998. Evaluating distance learning in social work education: A replication study. Journal of Social Work Education34 (2): 291-296.
14. Wagner, Norman, and D. Donald Thompson. 1997. Teaching with television: One university's model. International Journal of Instructional Media24 (3): 221-227.
15. Ward, Edna C., and J. Edward Lee. 1995. An instructor's guide to distance learning. Training & Development (November): 40-44.
16. Yeaworth, R. C., R. A. Benschoter, R. Meter, and S. Benson. 1995. Telecommunications and nursing education. Journal of Professional Nursing11 (4): 227-232.