Comparing screening methods for osteoporosis

Current Women's Health Reports

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 207-210

  Placide, Jon ^a   Martens, Mark G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE MINERAL; CALCANEUS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MORBIDITY; OSTEOPOROSIS; PREDICTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; AGED; BONE DENSITY; FEMUR NECK; FRACTURE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTMENOPAUSE OSTEOPOROSIS; RADIODENSITOMETRY; RADIOGRAPHY; UNITED STATES;

AGED; BONE DENSITY; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; FRACTURES, BONE; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS, POSTMENOPAUSAL; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0038505345     PISSN: 15345874     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Consensus development conference: prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 1991, 90:107-110.
2. National Osteoporosis Foundation Advocacy. The state of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the US National Osteoporosis Foundation 2002. www.nof.org.
3. Fast Facts on Osteoporosis. Washington, DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation; 1997.
4. Berg AO: Screening for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: recommendations and rationale. Am J Nurs 2003, 103:73-80.
5. Maricic M: Identifying women at risk for osteoporotic fractures. Contemp OB/GYN 47(Suppl):4-10.
6. Physician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Washington, DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation; 1999.
7. Ross P, Huang C, Davis J, et al.: Predicting vertebral deformity using bone densitometry at various skeletal sites and calcaneus ultrasound. Bone 1995, 16:325-332.
8. Cameron JR, Sorenson JA: Measurement of bone mineral in vivo: an improved method. Science 1963, 142:230-232.
9. Genant HK, Engelke K, Fuerst T, et al.: Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art. J Bone Miner Res 1996, 11:707-730.
10. Kelly TL, Slovik DM, Schoenfeld DA, et al.: Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1988, 67:839-844.
11. Finkelstein JS, Cleary RL, Butler JP, et al.: A comparison of lateral versus anterior posterior spine dual energy x-ray absorptiometry for the diagnosis of osteopenia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994, 78:724-730.
12. Myers BS, Arbogast KB, Lobaugh B, et al.: Improved assessment of lumber vertebral body strength using supine lateral dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 1994, 9:687-693.
13. Heaney RP, Avioli LV, Chestnut CH III, et al.: Ultrasound velocity through bone predicts incident vertebral deformity. J Bone Miner Res 1995, 10:341-345.
14. Schott AM, Weill-Engerer S, Hans D, et al.: Ultrasound discriminates patients with hip fracture equally as well as dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and independently of bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 1995, 10:243-249.
15. Bauer DC, Gluer CC, Genant HK, et al.: Quantitative ultrasound and vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 1995, 10:353-358.
16. Webber CE: The effect of fat on bone mineral measurements in normal subjects with recommended values of bone, muscle, and fat attenuation coefficients. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1987, 8:143-158.
17. Mazess R, Chestnut CH III, McClung M, Genant HK: Enhanced precision with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 1992, 51:14-17.
18. Hodgson SF, Watts NB, Bilezikan JP, et al.: American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists 2001 Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the Prevention and Management of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. Endocr Pract 2001, 7:293-312.
19. Ekman A, Michaelsson K, Petren-Mallmin M, et al.: DXA of the hip and heel ultrasound but not densitometry of the fingers can discriminate female hip fracture patients from controls: a comparison between four different methods. Osteoporos Int 2001, 12:185-191.
20. Johnston CC Jr, Slemenda CW, Melton LJ 3rd: Clinical use of bone densitometry. N Engl J Med 1991, 324:1105-1109.