Role of ultrasonography in screening for breast cancer;Place de l'échographie dans le dépistage du cancer du sein

Sein

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 127-134

  Balu Maestro, C ^a   Chapellier, C ^a   Bleuse, A ^a   Chauvel, C ^a   Dausse, F ^a  

^a CENTRE ANTOINE LACASSAGNE   (France)

Author keywords

Bi RADS classification; Interpretation; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CYST; CALCIFICATION; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SURVIVAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIFFERENTIATION; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PALPATION; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RISK FACTOR; SCREENING TEST;

EID: 0038487034     PISSN: 11631961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. BAKER JA, KORNGUTH PJ, SOO MS, WALSH R, MENGONI P. Sonography of solid breast lesions: observer variability of lesion description and assessment. AJR 1999; 172: 1621-1625.
2. BALU-MAESTRO C, CHAPELLIER C, BLEUSE A, CHAUVEL C, HÉNRY MD. Diagnostic échographique des lésions mammaires. Feuillets Radiologie 2002; 42: 179-190.
3. BALU-MAESTRO C, CHAPELLIER C, CHAUVEL C et al. Echographie ganglionnaire axillaire. Le Sein 2000; 10: 230-6.
4. BLOHMER JU, SCHMALISCH G, KÜRTEN A, CHAOUI R, LICHTENEGGER W. Relevance of sonographic criteria for differential diagnosis of mammary tumours. Eur J Ultrasound 1997; 6: 35-41.
5. BUCHBERGER W, DEKOEKKOEK-DOL P, SPRINGER P, OBRIST P, DÜNSER M. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: Clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR 1999; 137: 123-134.
6. CAPLAN LS, BLACKMAN D, NADEL M, MONTICCIOLO DL. Coding mammograms using the classification « probably benign finding-short interval follow-up suggested ». AJR 1999; 172: 339-342.
7. CHAO TC, LO YF, CHEN SC et al. Prospective sonographic study of 3093 breast tumors. J Ultrasound Med 1999; 173: 1331-6.
8. GORDON PB, GOLDENBERG L. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. Cancer 1995; 76: 626-630.
9. GUFLER H, BUITRAGO-TELLEZ CH, MADJAR H, ALLMANN KH, UHL M, ROHR-REYES A. Ultrasound demonstration of mammographically detected microcalcifications. Acta Radiol 2000; 41: 217-21.
10. HELVIE MA, PENNES DR, REBNER M, ADLER DD. Mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions: compliance rate and diagnostic yield. Radiology 1991; 178: 155-158.
11. JACKSON VP, HENDRICK RE, FEIG SA, KOPANS DB. Imaging of the radiographically dense breast. Radiology 1993; 188: 297-301.
12. KAPLAN SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2001; 221: 641-649.
13. KOLB TM, LICHY J, NEWHOUSE JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breast: Detection with screening US - Diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 1998; 207: 191-199.
14. KOLB TM, LICHY J, NEWHOUSE JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an anlysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002; 225: 165-175.
15. LAW J. Improved image quality for dense breasts in mammography. Br J Radiol 1992; 65: 50-55.
16. MENDELSON EB, BERG WA, MERRITT CRB. Toward a standardized breast ultrasound lexicon, BI-RADS: Ultrasound. Semin Roentg 2001; XXXVI: 217-25.
17. MANDELSON MT, OESTREICHER N, PORTER PL, WHITE D, FINDER CA, TAPLIN SH, WHITE E. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 1081-1087.
18. MOON WK, IM JG, KOH YY, NOH DY, PARK IA. US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications. Radiology 2000; 217: 849-854.
19. OREL SG, KAY N, REYNOLDS C, SULLIVAN D. Bi-Rads categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology 1999; 211: 845-850.
20. RAHBAR G, SIE AC, HANSEN GC, PRINCE JS, MELANO ME, REYNOLDS HE et al. Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation. Radiology 1999; 273: 889-94.
21. REVELON G, SHERMAN ME, GATEWOOD OMB, BREM RF. Focal fibrosis of the breast: Imaging characteristics and histopahtologic correlation. Radiology 2000; 216: 255-259.
22. SERADOUR B, ESTEVE J, HEID P, JACQUEMIER J. Hormone replacement therapy and screening mammograph analysis of the results in the Bouches du Rhône programme. J Med Screen 1999; 6: 99-102.
23. SICKLES EA. Probably bening breast lesions: When should follow-up be recommended and what is the optimal follow-up protocol? Radiology 1999; 213: 11-14.
24. SKAANE P. Ultrasonography as adjunct to mammography in the evaluation of breast tumors. Acta Radiol Suppl 1999; 420: 1-47.
25. STAVROS T, THICKMAN D, RAPP CL, DENNIS MA, PARKER SH, SISNEY GA. Solid breast nodules: Use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995; 196: 123-134.
26. VARAS X, LEBORGNE F, LEBORGNE JH. Nonpalpable probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography. Radiology 1992; 184: 409-414.
27. VENTA LA, KIM JP, PELLOSKI CE, MORROW M. Management of complex breast cysts. AJR 1999; 173: 1331-1336.
28. VIZCAINO I, GADEA L, ANDREO L, SALAS D, RUIZ-PERALES F, CUEVAS D, HERRANZ C, BUENO F and the Screening Program Working Group. Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. Radiology 2001; 219: 475-483.