Dimension related distance and its application in QSAR/QSPR model error estimation

QSAR and Combinatorial Science

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 422-429

  Xu, Yong Jin ^a,b   Gao, Hua ^a  

^a PFIZER INC   (United States)

^b SCIOS INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Dimension related distance; Error estimation; Euclidean distance; Molecular similarity; QSPR

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY;

DIMENSION RELATED DISTANCE; EUCLIDEAN DISTANCE; ITS APPLICATIONS; MODEL ERROR ESTIMATION; MOLECULAR SIMILARITY; PREDICTION ERRORS; QSAR/QSPR; QSPR; QSPR MODEL; TRAINING SETS;

ERRORS;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; MEASUREMENT; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE PROPERTY RELATION;

EID: 0038443423     PISSN: 1611020X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qsar.200390032     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. C. Hansch, R. M. Muir, T. Fujita, P. P. Maloney, F. Geiger, M. Streich, The Correlation of Biological Activity of Plant Growth Regulators and Chloromycetin Derivatives with Hammett Constants and Partition Coefficients, Nature 194, 178-180 (1962).
2. H. Gao, V. Shanmugasundaram, P. Lee, Estimation of Aqueous Solubility of Organic Compounds with QSPR Approach, Pharm. Res. 19, 497-503 (2002).
3. MOE software package from Chemical Computing Group Inc., http://www.chemcomp.com.
4. V. Gombar, K. Enslein, Assessment of n-Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient: When is the Assessment Reliable?, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36, 1127-1134 (1996).
5. R. L. Mason, R. F. Gunst, J. L. Hess, Statical Design and Analysis of Experiments with Applications to Engineering and Science, Wiley, New York 1989.
6. -1 of training compounds.
7. T. Potter, H. Matter, Random or Rational Design? Evaluation of Diverse Compound Subsets from Chemical Structure Database, J. Med. Chem. 41, 478-488 (1998); A. E. M. F. Soffers, M. G. Boersma, W. H. J. Vaes, J. Vervoort, B. Tyrakowska, J. L. M. Hermens, I. M. C. M. Rietjens, Computer-Modeling-Based QSARs for Analyzing Experimental Data on Biotransformation and Toxicity, Toxicol. in Vitro 15, 539-551 (2001); S. Balaz, V. Lukacova, Subcellular Pharmacokinetics and Its Potential for Library Focusing, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 20, 479-490 (2002).
8. T. Potter, H. Matter, Random or Rational Design? Evaluation of Diverse Compound Subsets from Chemical Structure Database, J. Med. Chem. 41, 478-488 (1998); A. E. M. F. Soffers, M. G. Boersma, W. H. J. Vaes, J. Vervoort, B. Tyrakowska, J. L. M. Hermens, I. M. C. M. Rietjens, Computer-Modeling-Based QSARs for Analyzing Experimental Data on Biotransformation and Toxicity, Toxicol. in Vitro 15, 539-551 (2001); S. Balaz, V. Lukacova, Subcellular Pharmacokinetics and Its Potential for Library Focusing, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 20, 479-490 (2002).
9. T. Potter, H. Matter, Random or Rational Design? Evaluation of Diverse Compound Subsets from Chemical Structure Database, J. Med. Chem. 41, 478-488 (1998); A. E. M. F. Soffers, M. G. Boersma, W. H. J. Vaes, J. Vervoort, B. Tyrakowska, J. L. M. Hermens, I. M. C. M. Rietjens, Computer-Modeling-Based QSARs for Analyzing Experimental Data on Biotransformation and Toxicity, Toxicol. in Vitro 15, 539-551 (2001); S. Balaz, V. Lukacova, Subcellular Pharmacokinetics and Its Potential for Library Focusing, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 20, 479-490 (2002).
10. M. A. Johnson, G. M. Maggiora, Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity, Wiley, New York 1990.
11. H. Wold, in: P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.) Multivariate Analysis, Academic Press, New York 1966; PCA analyses were done with MOE and Cerius2 software packages from Accelrys, http://www.accelrys.com.
12. C. D. Meyer, Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra, Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics, 2001.
13. i • Vi = 0. This can be reduced to the following equation set: