Family-friendly management in Great Britain: Testing various perspectives

Industrial Relations

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 221-250

  Wood, Stephen J ^a   de Menezes, Lilian M ^b   Lasaosa, Ana ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LABOR MARKET; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIAL POLICY; WORKING CONDITIONS;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0038418040     PISSN: 00198676     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-232X.00288     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Airey, C., J. Hales, R. Hamilton, A. McKernan, and S. Purdon. 1999. The Workplace Employee Relations Survey 1998 (WERS): 1998 Technical Report (Cross Section and Panel Samples). London: Social and Community Planning Research.
2. Appelbaum, E., and R. Batt. 1994. The New American Workplace: Transforming Work Systems in the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
3. Bailyn, L. 1993. Breaking the Mold. New York: The Free Press.
4. Bartholomew, D. and M. Knott. 1999. Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Bartholomew, D., L. de Menezes, and T. Tzamourani. 1997. "Latent Trait and Latent Class Models Applied to Survey Data." In Latent Class and Latent Trait Models in the Social Sciences, edited by J. Rost and R. Langeheim, pp. 219-32. Müenster: Waxmann Verlag.
6. Bond, J., E. Galinsky, and J. Swanberg. 1998. The 1997 National Study of the Changing Workforce. New York: Families & Work Institute.
7. Capelli, P., L. Bassi, H. Katz, D. Knoke, P. Osterman, and M. Useem. 1997. Change at Work. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Daft, R. I., and K. E. Weick. 1984. "Toward a Model of Organization as Interpretation Systems." Academy of Management Review, 9(April):284-95.
9. De Menezes, L., and D. Bartholomew. 1996. "New Developments in Latent Structure Analysis Applied to Social Attitudes" Journal of Royal Statistical Society A 159:213-24.
10. Friedman, D., and A. Johnson. 1996. Moving from Programs to Culture Change: The Next State for the Corporate Work-Family Agenda. New York: Families & Work Institute.
11. Gonyea, J., and B. K. Googins. 1996. "The Restructuring of Work and Family in the United States: A New Challenge for American Corporations." In The Work Family Challenge, edited by S. Lewis and J. Lewis, pp. 63-78. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Goodstein, J. 1994. "Institutional Pressures and Strategic Responsiveness: Employer Involvement in Work-Family Issues." Academy of Management Journal 37(April):350-82.
13. Goodstein, J. 1995. "Employer Involvement in Eldercare: An Organizational Adaptation Perspective." Academy of Management Journal 38(December):1657-71.
14. Hall, D. T. 1990. "Promoting Work Family Balance: An Organization-Change Approach." Organizational Dynamics 18(Spring ):5-8.
15. Hattie, J. 1985. "Methodology Review: Assessing Unidimensionality of Tests and Items." Applied Psychological Measurement 9(June):139-64.
16. Huselid, M. A. 1995. "The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity and Corporate Financial Performance." Academy of Management Journal 35(August):635-72.
17. Ingram, P., and T. Simons. 1995. "Institutional and Resource Dependence Determinants of Responsiveness to Work Family Issues." Academy of Management Journal 38(October):1466-82.
18. Kochan, T., and P. Osterman. 1995. The Mutual Gains Enterprise. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
19. Lawler, E. 1986. High Involvement Management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. Lewis, S. 1997. "'Family Friendly' Employment Policies: A Route to Changing Organizational Culture or Playing About at the Margins?" Gender, Work and Organization 4(January):13-23.
21. MacDuffie, J. P. 1995. "Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production System in the World Auto Industry." Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48(March):197-221.
22. Millward, N., M. Stevens, D. Smart, and W. R. Hawes. 1992. Workplace Industrial Relations in Transition. Aldershot, England: Dartmouth.
23. Milliken, F. J., J. E. Dutton, and J. M. Beyer. 1990. "Understanding Organizational Adaptation to Change: The Case of Work-Family Issues," Human Resource Planning 13:91-107.
24. Morgan. H., and F. J. Milliken. 1992. "Keys to Action: Understanding Differences in Organizations' Responsiveness to Work-and-Family Issues." Human Resoure Management 31(3):227-48.
25. Oliver, C. 1991. "Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes." Academy of management Review 16(January):145-79.
26. Osterman, P. 1995. "Work/Family Programs and the Employment Relationship." Admistrative Science Quarterly 40(December):681-700.
27. Porter, M. 1985. The Competitive Advantage. New York: The Free Press.
28. Walton, R. 1985. "From Control to Commitment in the Workplace." Harvard Business Review 63(2):77-84.
29. Wood, S. 1996. "How Different Are Human Resource Practices in Japanese Transplants in the UK?" Industrial Relations 35(October):511-25.
30. Wood, S. 1999a. "Family-Friendly Management: Testing the Various Perspectives." National Institute Economic Review 168(April):99-116.
31. Wood, S. 1999b. "Human Resource Management and Performance." International Journal of Management Review 1(December):367-413.
32. Wood, S. 1999c. "Getting the Measure of the Transformed Organization." British Journal of Industrial Relations 37(September):391-418.
33. Wood, S. and M. Albanese. 1995. "Can You Speak of a High Commitment Management on the Shop Floor?" Journal of Management Studies 32(March):215-47.
34. Wood, S. and L. de Menezes. 1998. "High Commitment Management in the UK: Evidence From the Workplace Industrial Relations Survey and Employers' Manpower and Skills Practices Survey" Human Relations 51(April):485-515.