An assessment of encapsulated versus hand-mixed glass ionomer restoratives

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 168-177

  Fleming, Garry J P ^a,b   Zala, Dillon M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLASS IONOMER; CHEMFLEX; FUJI IX GP FAST; KETAC FIL; KETAC-FIL; MALEIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; FLOW MEASUREMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MIXER; POROSITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; VISCOSITY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHEMISTRY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DENTAL SURGERY; ELASTICITY; FLOW KINETICS; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; TIME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; ELASTICITY; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALEATES; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POROSITY; RHEOLOGY; TIME FACTORS; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0038390233     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bass EV & Wing G (1988) Clinical Note No 7. The mixing of encapsulated glass ionomer cement restorative materials Australian Dental Journal 33(3) 243.
2. Billington RW, Williams JA & Pearson GJ (1990) Variation in powder/liquid ratio of a restorative glass-ionomer cement used in dental practice British Dental Journal 169(6) 164-167.
3. Bovis SC, Harrington E & Wilson HJ (1971) Setting characteristics of composite filling materials British Dental Journal 131(8) 352-356.
4. Cook WD & Brockhurst P (1980) The oscillating rheometer - what does it measure? Journal of Dental Research 59(5) 795-799.
5. Covey DA & Ewoldsen NO (2001) Porosity in manually and machine mixed resin-modified glass ionomer cements Operative Dentistry 26(6) 617-623.
6. Fleming GJ, Landini G & Marquis PM (2002) Properties of encapsulated and hand-mixed zinc phosphate dental cement American Journal of Dentistry 15(2) 91-96.
7. Fleming GJ, Shelton RM, Landini G & Marquis PM (2001) The influence of mixing ratio on the toughening mechanisms of a hand-mixed zinc phosphate dental cement Dental Materials 17(1) 14-20.
8. Fleming GJ, Shortall AC, Shelton RM & Marquis PM (1999) Encapsulated versus hand-mixed zinc phosphate dental cement Biomaterials 20(22) 2147-2153.
9. Fok SL, Mitchell BC, Smart J & Marsden BJ (2001) A numerical study on the application of the Weibull theory to brittle materials Engineering Fracture Mechanics 68(10) 1171-1179.
10. Jacobsen PH (1976) Working time of polymeric restorative materials Journal of Dental Research 55(2) 244-251.
11. Jacobsen PH & Von Fraunhofer JA (1974) Setting characteristics of anterior restorative materials Journal of Dental Research 53(2) 461-467.
12. Kelly JR, Campbell SD & Bowen HK (1989) Fracture-surface analysis of dental ceramics Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 62(5) 536-541.
13. nd ed edited by Kingery WD New York John Wiley & Sons p 768-815.
14. Mitchell CA & Douglas WH (1997) Comparison of the porosity of hand-mixed and capsulated glass-ionomer luting cements Biomaterials 18(16) 1127-1131.
15. nd ed London Martin Dunitz p 1-24.
16. Nomoto R & McCabe JF (2001) Effect of mixing methods on the compressive strength of glass ionomer cements Journal of Dentistry 29(3) 205-210.
17. Plant CG, Jones IH & Wilson HJ (1972) Setting characteristics of lining and cementing materials British Dental Journal 133(1) 21-24.
18. Plant CG & Wilson HJ (1970) Early strengths of lining materials British Dental Journal 129(6) 269-274.
19. Ritter JE, Bandyopadhyay N & Jakus K (1981) Statistical reproducibility of the dynamic and static fatigue experiments Ceramic Bulletin 60 798-806.
20. Rudnick A, Hunter AR & Holden FC (1963) An analysis of the Diametral-Compression Test Materials Research and Standards 3 283-289.
21. Trustrum K & Jayatilaka ADS (1979) On estimating the Weibull modulus for a brittle material Journal of Materials Science 14 1080-1084.
22. Vermilyea S, Powers JM & Craig RG (1977) Rotational viscometry of a zinc phosphate and a zinc polyacrylate cement Journal of Dental Research 56(7) 762-767.
23. Weibel ER (1979a) Particle size and shape in Weibel ER Stereological Methods Vol 1 Practical Methods for Biological Morphometry London Academic Press 162-203.
24. Weibel ER (1979b) Size distribution of section profiles when spheres are randomly sectioned in Weibel ER Stereological Methods Vol 2 Theoretical Foundations London Academic Press 175-214.
25. Weibull W (1951) A statistical distribution function of wide applicability Journal of Applied Mechanics 18 293-297.
26. White SN & Yu Z (1993) Compressive and diametral tensile strengths of current adhesive luting agents Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 69(6) 568-572.
27. Williams PD & Smith DC (1971) Measurement of the tensile strength of dental restorative materials by use of a diametral compression test Journal of Dental Research 50(2) 436-442.
28. st edition edited by von Fraunhofer JA London Butterworths p 131-158A.
29. Wilson HJ (1966) Elastomeric impression materials 1 The setting material British Dental Journal 121(6) 277-283.