Properties of encapsulated and hand-mixed zinc phosphate dental cement

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 91-96

  Fleming, Garry J P ^a   Landini, Gabriel ^a   Marquis, Peter M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ZINC PHOSPHATE;

AIR; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; ELASTICITY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; MICROCAPSULE; POROSITY; POWDER; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; SYRINGE; VOLATILIZATION;

AIR; CAPSULES; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POROSITY; POWDERS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOLUTIONS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SYRINGES; VOLATILIZATION; ZINC PHOSPHATE CEMENT;

EID: 0036526919     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Kelly JR, Campbell SD, Bowen HK. Fracture-surface analysis of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 536-541.
2. Thompson JY, Anusavice KJ, Naman A, et al. Fracture surface characterization of clinically failed all-ceramic crowns. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1824-1832.
3. Kelly JR, Giordano R, Pober R, et al. Fracture surface analysis of dental ceramics: Clinically failed restorations. Int J Prosthod 1990; 3: 430-441.
4. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 135-141.
5. Marquis PM. The influence of cements on the mechanical performance of dental ceramics. In: Yamamuro T, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Dental materials. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Ceramics in Medicine: Kyoto, Japan. Bioceramics Vol 5, Japan: Kobunshi Kankokai, 1992; 317-24.
6. Fleming GJP, Shelton RM, Marquis PM. The influence of clinically induced variability on the bi-axial fracture strength of cemented aluminous core porcelain discs. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 62-70.
7. Smith DC, Ruse ND. Acidity of glass ionomer cements during setting and its relation to pulp sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 1986; 112: 654-657.
8. Fleming GJP, Shelton RM, Marquis PM. The influence of clinically induced variability on the distribution of compressive fracture strengths of a hand-mixed zinc phosphate dental cement. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 87-97.
9. Darvell BW. Aspects of the chemistry of zinc phosphate cements. Aust Dent J 1984; 29: 242-244.
10. American Dental Association Specification No. 8 for Zinc Phosphate Cement. Revised American National Standards: Council on Dental Materials and Devices. J Am Dent Assoc 1978; 96: 121-123.
11. Mitchell CA, Douglas WH. Comparison of the porosity of hand-mixed and encapsulated glass-ionomer luting cements. Biomat 1997; 18: 1127-1131.
12. Mitchell CA, Orr JF, Russell MD. Capsulated versus hand-mixed glass-ionomer luting cements for post retention. J Dent 1998; 26: 47-51.
13. Henschel CJ. The effect of mixing surface temperature upon dental cementation. J Am Dent Assoc 1943; 30: 1583-1589.
14. Data Sheet for PhosphaCEM PL hand-mixed zinc phosphate dental cement, Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein.
15. Data Sheet for PhosphaCEM IC encapsulated zinc phosphate dental cement, Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein.
16. Norman RD, Swartz ML, Phillips RW, et al. Properties of cements mixed from liquids with altered water content. J Prosthet Dent 1970; 24: 410-418.
17. Paffenbarger GC, Sweeney WT, Isaacs A. A preliminary report on the zinc phosphate cements. J Am Dent Assoc 1933; 20: 1960-1982.
18. Fleming GJP, Shortall ACC, Shelton RM, et al. Encapsulated versus hand-mixed zinc phosphate dental cement. Biomat 1999; 20: 2147-2153.
19. Weibel ER. Particle size and shape. In: Weibel ER. Stereological Methods. Vol. 1. Practical Methods for Biological Morphometry. London: Academic Press, 1979; 162-203.
20. Weibel ER. Size distribution of section profiles when spheres are randomly sectioned. In: Weibel ER. Stereological Methods. Vol. 2. Theoretical Foundations. London: Academic Press, 1979; 175-214.
21. Weibull W. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech 1951; 18: 293-297.
22. Mann NR, Schafer RE and Singpurwalla NO. Methods for Statistical Analysis of Reliability and Life Data. New York: Wiley & Sons, 1974; 4-45.
23. Trustrum K, Jayatilaka ADS. On estimating the Weibull modulus for a brittle material. J Mater Sci 1979; 14: 1080-1084.
24. Ritter JE, Bandyopadhyay N, Jakus K. Statistical reproducibility of the dynamic and static fatigue experiments. Ceram Bull 1981; 60: 798-806.
25. Wilson AD, Nicholson JW. Phosphate bonded cements. In: Wilson AD, Nicholson JW. Acid-base Cements: Their Biomedical and Industrial Applications. Cambridge: University Press, 1993; 197-282.
26. Servais GE, Cartz L. Structure of zinc phosphate dental cement. J Dent Res 1971; 50: 13-20.
27. Crowell WS. Physical chemistry of dental cements. J Am Dent Assoc 1927; 14: 1030-1048.
28. Crisp S, O'Neill IK, Prosser HJ, et al. Infrared spectroscopic studies on the development of crystallinity in dental zinc phosphate cements. J Dent Res 1978; 57: 245-254.
29. Faber KT, Evans AG. Crack deflection processes - I. Theory. Acta Metall 1983; 31: 565-576.
30. Mai YM, Lawn BR. Crack-interface grain bridging as a fracture resistance mechanism in ceramics: II. Theoretical fracture mechanics model. J Am Ceram Soc 1987; 70: 289-294.
31. Evans AG. Perspective on the development of high-toughness ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 1990; 73: 187-206.
32. Bass EV, Wing G. The mixing of encapsulated glass ionomer cement restorative materials. Aust Dent J 1988; 33: 243.
33. Kelly JR. Perspectives on strength. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 103-110.
34. Lipson C, Sheth NJ. Statistical Design and Analysis of Engineering Experiments. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973; 372-415.