Comparison of microleakage on one composite etched with phosphoric acid or a combination of phosphoric and hydrofluoric acids and bonded with several different systems

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 161-169

  Szep, Susanne ^a   Langner, Nicole ^a   Bayer, Silja ^a   Börnichen, Diana ^a   Schulz, Christoph ^a   Gerhardt, Thomas ^a   Schriever, Anette ^a   Becker, Joachim ^a   Heidemann, Detlef ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETONE; ADHESIVE AGENT; ALCOHOL; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; METHYLENE BLUE; PHOSPHORIC ACID; RINGER SOLUTION; WATER; ACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; ETCH′ HERCULITE XR; MALEIC ACID DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; OPTIBOND SOLO; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME & BOND NT; PYROPHOSPHATE; RESIN CEMENT; SYNTAC DENTINE ADHESIVE; SYNTAC SPRINT;

ADHESION; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL BOND; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTIN; DIFFUSION; EVALUATION; GINGIVA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYBRID; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MICROSCOPY; PERFUSION; SIMULATION; STANDARD; TEMPERATURE; TOOTH EXTRACTION; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; DRUG EFFECT; ENDODONTICS; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; SCOTCHBOND; TOOTH DISEASE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ACRYLATES; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; DIPHOSPHATES; ETHANOL; HUMANS; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; MALEATES; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHACRYLATES; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0038389114     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2003.32     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Sano H, Uno S, Inoue S. Modern trends in adhesive dentistry. Como: G. Erredue; 1998. p. 2-10.
2. Manhart J, Weber K, Mehl A, Hickel R. Marginal quality of dentin adhesives/composites in mixed class V cavities. J Dent Res 1999;78:444-7.
3. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Bonding efficiency and interfacial morphology of one-bottle adhesives to contaminated dentin surfaces. Am J Dent 1998; 11:281-5.
4. Kanca J 3rd. Wet bonding: effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent 1996;9:273-6.
5. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Tokyo: Quintessence Publishing; 1998. p. 50-93.
6. Jacobsen T, Soderhold KJ. Some effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 1995;11:132-6.
7. Fortin D, Swift EJ Jr, Denehy GE, Reinhardt JW. Bond strength and microleakage of current dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1994;10:253-8.
8. Fanning DE, Wakefield CW, Robbins JW, Bagley AL. Effect of a filled adhesive on bond strength in three dentinal bonding systems. Gen Dent 1995;43:256-8.
9. Wakefield CW, Draughn RA, Sneed WD, Davis TN. Shear bond strengths of six bonding systems using the pushout method of in vitro testing. Oper Dent 1998;23:69-76.
10. Fritz UB, Finger WJ. Bonding efficiency of single-bottle enamel/dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 1999;12:277-82.
11. Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent 1999; 24:172-80.
12. Touati B, Rocha PK, Nathanson D. Esthetic dentistry and ceramic restorations. London: Thieme Medical; 1999. p. 9-24.
13. Roulet JF. Marginal integrity: clinical significance. J Dent 1994;22:S9-12.
14. Hinoura K, Setcos JC, Phillips RW. Cavity design and placement techniques for Class 2 composites. Oper Dent 1988;13:12-9.
15. Santini A, Mitchell S. Microleakage of composite restorations bonded with three new dentin bonding agents. J Esthet Dent 1998;10:296-304.
16. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Shear bond strength and microleakage of new dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 1993;6:295-8.
17. Schoch M, Kramer N, Frankenberger R, Petschelt A. Direct posterior composite restorations with a new adhesive system: one-year results. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:167-73.
18. Shahani DR, Menezes JM. The effect of retention grooves on posterior composite resin restorations: an in vitro microleakage study. Oper Dent 1992;17:156-64.
19. Donly KJ, Wild TW, Jensen ME. Posterior composite Class II restorations: in vitro comparison of preparation designs and restoration techniques. Dent Mater 1990;6:88-93.
20. Eakle WS, Ito RK. Effect of insertion technique on microleakage in mesio-occlusodistal composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1990;21:369-74.
21. Dietschi D, De Siebenthal G, Neveu-Rosenstand L, Holz J. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Quintessence Int 1995;26:717-27.
22. Szep S, Frank H, Kenzel B, Gerhardt T, Heidemann D. Comparative study of composite resin placement: centripetal buildup versus incremental technique. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2001;13:243-50.
23. Bichacho N. The centripetal build-up for composite resin posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1994;6:17-23.
24. Szep S, Gerhardt T, Gockel HW, Ruppel M, Metzeltin D, Heidemann D. In vitro dentinal surface reaction of 9.5% buffered hydrofluoric acid in repair of ceramic restorations: a scanning electron microscopic investigation. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:668-74.
25. Attin T, Schaller HG, Hellwig E. Fluoride uptake in dentin with and without simulating dentinal fluid flow. Clin Oral Investig 1997;1:125-30.
26. Augustin C, Paul SJ, Luthy H, Scharer P. Perfusing dentine with horse serum and physiologic saline: its effects on adhesion of dentine bonding agents. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:596-602.
27. Elhabashy A, Swift EJ Jr, Boyer DB, Denehy GE. Effects of dentin permeability and hydration on the bond strengths of dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 1993;6:123-6.
28. Nikaido T, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Takatsu T. Effect of pulpal pressure on adhesion of resin composite to dentin: bovine serum versus saline. Quintessence Int 1995;26:221-6.
29. Lucena-Martin C, Gonzalez-Rodriguez MP, Ferrer-Luque CM, Robles-Gijon V, Navajas JM. Study of the shear bond strength of five one-component adhesives under simulated pulpal pressure. Oper Dent 1999; 24:73-80.
30. Lee VA. Polymeric restorative materials. In: O'Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection. 2nd ed. Chicago: Quintessence; 1997. p. 106.
31. Hansen EK. Effect of cavity depth and application technique on marginal adaptation of resins in dentin cavities. J Dent Res 1986;65:1319-21.
32. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Fatigue behaviour of different dentin adhesives. Clin Oral Investig 1999;3:11-7.
33. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Comparison of the marginal integrity of in vivo and in vitro Class II composite restorations. J Dent 1993;21:158-62.
34. Draughn RA. Compressive fatigue limits of composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1979;58:1093-6.
35. Youngson CC, Jones JC, Manogue M, Smith IS. In vitro dentinal penetration by tracers used in microleakage studies. Int Endod J 1998;31:90-9.