Discrepancy in patient and physician perception of patient's quality of life related to urinary symptoms

Urology

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 49-53

  Rodríguez, Larissa V ^a   Blander, Daniel S ^b   Dorey, Frederick ^b   Raz, Shlomo ^b   Zimmern, Philippe ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PAIN; PATIENT; PERCEPTION; PHYSICIAN; POLLAKISURIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SYMPTOM; TISSUE INJURY; URGE INCONTINENCE; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINARY TRACT OBSTRUCTION; URINE RETENTION; UROGENITAL TRACT DISEASE;

EID: 0038353635     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00144-4     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Blaivas J.G., Apell R.A., Fantl J.A., et al. Standards of efficacy for evaluation of treatment outcomes in urinary incontinence recommendation of the Urodynamic Society . Neurourol Urodyn. 161:1997;272-274.
2. Deval B., Jeffry L., Al Najjar F., et al. Determinants of patient dissatisfaction after a tension-free vaginal tape procedure for urinary incontinence. J Urol. 167:2002;2093-2097.
3. Jeffry L., Deval B., Birsan A., et al. Objective and subjective cure rates after tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of urinary incontinence. Urology. 58:2001;702-706.
4. Korman H.J., Sirls L.T., Kirkemo A.K. Success rate of modified Pereyra bladder neck suspension determined by outcomes analysis. J Urol. 152:1994;1453-1457.
5. Sirls L.T., Keoleian C.M., Korman H.J., et al. The effect of study methodology on reported success rates of the modified Pereyra bladder neck suspension. J Urol. 154:1995;1732-1735.
6. Bergner M., Bobbitt R.A., Carter W.B., et al. The Sickness Impact Profile development and final revision of a health status measure . Med Care. 19:1981;787-805.
7. Brazier J.E., Harper R., Jones N.M., et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire new outcome measure for primary care . BMJ. 305:1992;160-164.
8. Corcos J., Beaulieu S., Donovan J., et al. Quality of life assessment in men and women with urinary incontinence. J Urol. 168:2002;896-905.
9. Hagen S., Hanley J., Capewell A. Test-retest reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the urogenital distress inventory and the incontinence impact questionnaire. Neurourol Urodyn. 21:2002;534-539.
10. Jenkinson C., Coulter A., Wright L. Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire normative data for adults of working age . BMJ. 306:1993;1437-1440.
11. Jenkinson C., Wright L., Coulter A. Criterion validity and reliability of the SF-36 in a population sample. Qual Life Res. 3:1994;7-12.
12. McHorney C.A., Ware J.E.J., Raczek A.E. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs . Med Care. 31:1993;247-263.
13. Shumaker S.A., Wyman J.F., Uebersax J.S., et al. Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory . Qual Life Res. 3:1994;291-306.
14. Uebersax J.S., Wyman J.F., Shumaker S.A., et al. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory . Neurourol Urodyn. 14:1995;131-139.
15. Eisen S.V. Client satisfaction and clinical outcomes - do we need to measure both? Behav Healthcare Tomorrow. 5:1996;71-73.
16. Lee R.S., DeAntoni E., Daneshgari F. Compliance with recommendations of the Urodynamic Society for Standards of Efficacy for Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes in Urinary Incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 21:2002;482-485.
17. Unden A.L., Elofsson S. Health from the patient's point of view how does it relate to the physician's judgement? Fam Pract. 18:2001;174-180.
18. Woodend A.K., Nair R.C., Tang A.S. Definition of life quality from a patient versus health care professional perspective. Int J Rehabil Res. 20:1997;71-80.
19. Biggs M.M., Shores-Wilson K., Rush A.J., et al. A comparison of alternative assessments of depressive symptom severity a pilot study . Psychiatry Res. 96:2000;269-279.
20. Coyne J.C., Schwenk T.L., Smolinski M. Recognizing depression a comparison of family physician ratings, self-report, and interview measures . J Am Board Fam Pract. 4:1991;207-215.
21. Coyne J.C., Thompson R., Racioppo M.W. Validity and efficiency of screening for history of depression by self-report. Psychol Assess. 13:2001;163-170.
22. Eisen S.V. Assessment of subjective distress by patients' self-report versus structured interview. Psychol Rep. 76:1995;35-39.
23. Hoher J., Bach T., Munster A., et al. Does the mode of data collection change results in a subjective knee score? Self-administration versus interview. Am J Sports Med. 25:1997;642-647.
24. Odding E., Valkenburg H.A., Stam H.J., et al. Assessing joint pain complaints and locomotor disability in the Rotterdam study effect of population selection and assessment mode . Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 81:2000;189-193.
25. Justice A.C., Chang C.H., Rabeneck L., et al. Clinical importance of provider-reported HIV symptoms compared with patient-report. Med Care. 9:2001;397-408.
26. Kalarchian M.A., Wilson G.T., Brolin R.E., et al. Assessment of eating disorders in bariatric surgery candidates self-report questionnaire versus interview . Int J Eat Disord. 28:2000;465-469.
27. Lindstrom E., Lewander T., Malm U., et al. Patient-rated versus clinician-rated side effects of drug treatment in schizophrenia clinical validation of a self-rating version of the UKU Side Effect Rating Scale (UKU-SERS-Pat) . Nord J Psychiatry. 55:(suppl 44):2001;5-69.
28. Luoma M.L., Hakamies-Blomqvist L., Sjostrom J., et al. Physical performance, toxicity, and quality of life as assessed by the physician and the patient. Acta Oncol. 41:2002;44-49.
29. Neville C., Clarke A.E., Joseph L., et al. Learning from discordance in patient and physician global assessments of systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity. J Rheumatol. 27:2000;675-679.
30. Sneeuw K.C., Aaronson N.K., Sprangers M.A., et al. Comparison of patient and proxy EORTC QLQ-C30 ratings in assessing the quality of life of cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 51:1998;617-631.
31. Sneeuw K.C., Aaronson N.K., Sprangers M.A., et al. Evaluating the quality of life of cancer patients assessments by patients, significant others, physicians and nurses . Br J Cancer. 81:1999;87-94.
32. Sneeuw K.C., Aaronson N.K., Sprangers M.A., et al. Value of caregiver ratings in evaluating the quality of life of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 15:1997;1206-1217.
33. Sneeuw K.C., Aaronson N.K., Yarnold J.R., et al. Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 1. Comparison of patients' ratings, observers' ratings, and objective assessments. Radiother Oncol. 25:1992;153-159.
34. Stromgren A.S., Groenvold M., Pedersen L., et al. Symptomatology of cancer patients in palliative care content validation of self-assessment questionnaires against medical records . Eur J Cancer. 38:2002;788-794.
35. Stromgren A.S., Groenvold M., Pedersen L., et al. Does the medical record cover the symptoms experienced by cancer patients receiving palliative care? A comparison of the record and patient self-rating. J Pain Symptom Manage. 21:2001;189-196.
36. Stromgren A.S., Groenvold M., Sorensen A., et al. Symptom recognition in advanced cancer a comparison of nursing records against patient self-rating . Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 45:2001;1080-1085.
37. FitzGerald M.P., Brubaker L. Urinary incontinence symptom scores and urodynamic diagnoses. Neurourol Urodyn. 21:2002;30-35.
38. Lemack G.E., Zimmern P.E. Predictability of urodynamic findings based on the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 questionnaire. Urology. 54:1999;461-466.
39. Harvey M.A., Kristjansson B., Griffith D., et al. The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory a revisit of their validity in women without a urodynamic diagnosis . Am J Obstet Gynecol. 185:2001;25-31.