Ultrasound in the management of breast disease

Current Women's Health Reports

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 156-164

  Pavic, Dag ^a   Koomen, Marcia ^a   Kuzmiak, Cherie ^a   Pisano, Etta D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

BREAST CANCER; BREAST CYST; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST LESION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; ELASTICITY; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; PATHOLOGY;

BREAST; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 0038341671     PISSN: 15345874     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. American College of Radiology: Download List for ACR Standards. http://www.acr.org/dyna/?mast=publications&doc=departments/ standćred/standards/standards.html. Accessed 10-31-02.
2. The International Breast Ultrasound School. http://www.ibus.org. Accessed 10-31-02.
3. Rizzatto G, Chersevani R: Breast ultrasound and new technologies. Eur J Radiol 1998, 27(Suppl 2):S242-S249.
4. Durfee SM, Selland DL, Smith DN, et al.: Sonographic evaluation of clinically palpable breast cancers invisible on mammography. Breast J 2000, 6:247-251.
5. Georgian-Smith D, Taylor KJ, Madjar H, et al.: Sonography of palpable breast cancer. J Clin Ultrasound 2000, 28:211-216.
6. Soo MS, Rosen EL, Baker JA, et al.: Negative predictive value of sonography with mammography in patients with palpable breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001, 177:1167-1170.
7. Kaiser JS, Helvie MA, Blacklaw RL, Roubidoux MA: Palpable breast thickening: role of mammography and US in cancer detection. Radiology 2002, 223:839-844.
8. Moy L, Slanetz PJ, Moore R, et al.: Specificity of mammography and US in the evaluation of a palpable abnormality: retrospective review. Radiology 2002, 225:176-181.
9. Taylor KJ, Merritt C, Piccoli C, et al.: Ultrasound as a complement to mammography and breast examination to characterize breast masses. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002, 28:19-26.
10. Sickles EA: Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3184 consecutive cases. Radiology 1991, 179:463-468.
11. Dennis MA, Parker SH, Klaus AJ, et al.: Breast biopsy avoidance: the value of normal mammograms and normal sonograms in the setting of a palpable lump. Radiology 2001, 219:186-191.
12. Flobbe K, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, et al.: The role of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography in the detection of breast cancer: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2002, 38:1044-1050.
13. Tardivon AA, Guinebretiere JM, Dromain C, Vanel D: Imaging and management of nonpalpable lesions of the breast. Eur J Radiol 2002, 42:2-9.
14. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, et al.: Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995, 196:123-134.
15. Rahbar G, Sie AC, Hansen GC, et al.: Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation. Radiology 1999, 213:889-894.
16. Baker JA, Soo MS: Breast US: assessment of technical quality and image interpretation. Radiology 2002, 223:229-238.
17. Huber S, Wagner M, Medl M, Czembirek H: Real-time spatial compound imaging in breast ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002, 28:155-163.
18. Seo BK, Oh YW, Kim HR, et al.: Sonographic evaluation of breast nodules: comparison of conventional, real-time compound, and pulse-inversion harmonic images. Korean J Radiol 2002, 3:38-44.
19. Rotten D, Levaillant JM, Zerat L: Analysis of normal breast tissue and of solid breast masses using three-dimensional ultrasound mammography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999, 14:114-124.
20. Folkman J: How is blood vessel growth regulated in normal and neoplastic tissue? G.H.A. Clowes Memorial Award lecture. Cancer Res 1986, 46:467-473.
21. Schoenberger SG, Sutherland CM, Robinson AE: Breast neoplasms: duplex sonographic imaging as an adjunct in diagnosis. Radiology 1988, 168:665-668.
22. Hylton NM: Vascularity assessment of breast lesions with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2001, 9:321-328.
23. Kook SH, Park HW, Lee YR, et al.: Evaluation of solid breast lesions with power Doppler sonography. J Clin Ultrasound 1999, 27:231-237.
24. Ozdemir A, Ozdemir H, Maral I, et al.: Differential diagnosis of solid breast lesions: contribution of Doppler studies to mammography and gray scale imaging. J Ultrasound Med 2001, 20:1091-1101.
25. Stuhrmann M, Aronius R, Schietzel M: Tumor vascularity of breast lesions: potentials and limits of contrast-enhanced Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000, 175:1585-1589.
26. Mehta TS, Raza S, Baum JK: Use of Doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of breast carcinoma. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2000, 21:297-307.
27. Madjar H: Contrast ultrasound in breast tumor characterization: present situation and future tracks. Eur Radiol 2001, 11(Suppl 3):E41-E46.
28. Rizzatto G, Martegani A, Chersevani R, et al.: Importance of staging of breast cancer and role of contrast ultrasound. Eur Radiol 2001, 11(Suppl 3):E47-E51.
29. Hieken TJ, Harrison J, Herreros J, Velasco JM: Correlating sonography, mammography, and pathology in the assessment of breast cancer size. Am J Surg 2001, 182:351-354.
30. Gawne-Cain ML, Smith E, Darby M, Given-Wilson R: The use of ultrasound for monitoring breast tumour response to pro-adjuvant therapy. Clin Radiol 1995, 50:681-686.
31. Dash N, Chafin SH, Johnson RR, Contractor FM: Usefulness of tissue marker clips in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999, 173:911-917.
32. Moon WK, Noh DY, Im JG: Multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral breast cancers: bilateral whole-breast US in the preoperative evaluation of patients. Radiology 2002, 224:569-576.
33. Berg WA, Gilbreath PL: Multicentric and multifocal cancer: whole-breast US in preoperative evaluation. Radiology 2000, 214:59-66.
34. Gunhan-Bilgen I, Memis A, Ustun EE: Metastatic intramammary lymph nodes: mammographic and ultrasonographic features. Eur J Radiol 2001, 40:24-29.
35. Krishnamurthy S, Sneige N, Bedi DG, et al.: Role of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of indeterminate and suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the initial staging of breast carcinoma. Cancer 2002, 95:982-988.
36. Yang WT, Metreweli C, Lam PK, Chang J: Benign and malignant breast masses and axillary nodes: evaluation with echo-enhanced color power Doppler US. Radiology 2001, 220:795-802.
37. Henry-Tillman R, Johnson AT, Smith LF, Klimberg VS: Intraoperative ultrasound and other techniques to achieve negative margins. Semin Surg Oncol 2001, 20:206-213.
38. Baz E, Madjar H, Reuss C, et al.: The role of enhanced Doppler ultrasound in differentiation of benign vs. malignant scar lesion after breast surgery for malignancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000, 15:377-82.
39. Crowe J, Rim A, Patrick R, et al.: A prospective review of the decline of excisional breast biopsy. Am J Surg 2002, 184:353-355.
40. Liberman L, Feng TL, Dershaw DD, et al.: US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness. Radiology 1998, 208:717-723.
41. Fornage BD, Sneige N, Edeiken BS: Interventional breast sonography. Eur J Radiol 2002, 42:17-31.
42. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al.: Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994, 193:359-364.
43. Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Caudry DJ, et al.: Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: results from the radiologic diagnostic oncology group V. Radiology 2001, 219:785-792.
44. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, et al.: US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993, 187:507-511.
45. Schoonjans JM, Brem RF: Fourteen-gauge ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy of breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 2001, 20:967-972.
46. Weismann CF, Forstner R, Prokop E, Rettenbacher T: Three-dimensional targeting: a new three-dimensional ultrasound technique to evaluate needle position during breast biopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000, 16:359-364.
47. Wunderbaldinger P, Helbich TH, Partik B, et al.: First experience with a new dedicated ultrasound system for computer-guided large-core breast biopsy. Eur Radiol 2001, 11:2460-2464.
48. Rosenthal M, State A, Lee J, et al.: Augmented reality guidance for needle biopsies: an initial randomized, controlled trial in phantoms (dagger). Med Image Anal 2002, 6:313-320.
49. Surry K, Smith W, Campbell L, et al.: The development and evaluation of a three-dimensional ultrasound-guided breast biopsy apparatus. Med Image Anal 2002, 6:301-312.
50. Cheung YC, Wan YL, Chen SC, et al.: Sonographic evaluation of mammographically detected microcalcifications without a mass prior to stereotactic core needle biopsy. J Clin Ultrasound 2002, 30:323-331.
51. Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL, Vo TT: Sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications of the breast: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002, 178:1007-1015.
52. Gordon PB: Ultrasound for breast cancer screening and staging. Radiol Clin North Am 2002, 40:431-441.
53. Hillman B: ACRIN: where we are and where we are going. Presentation at American College of Radiology Imaging Network Annual Meeting. Arlington, VA: October 18, 2002.
54. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH: Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002, 225:165-175.
55. Kaplan SS: Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2001, 221:641-649.
56. Hou MF, Chuang HY, Ou-Yang F, et al.: Comparison of breast mammography, sonography and physical examination for screening women at high risk of breast cancer in Taiwan. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002, 28:415-420.
57. Kopans DB, Meyer JE, Lindfors KK: Whole-breast US imaging: four-year follow-up. Radiology 1985, 157:505-507.
58. University of Michigan, School of Medicine, Department of Radiology Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) and Mammography Laboratory. http://www-personal.engin.umich.edu/~kearfott/RadioLabDes.html. Accessed 10-31-02.
59. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ: Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001, 220:781-786.
60. Sivaramakrishna R, Powell K, Lieber M, et al.: Texture analysis of lesions in breast ultrasound images. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2002, 26:303-307.
61. Kitaoka F, Sakai H, Kuroda Y, et al.: Internal echo histogram examination has a role in distinguishing malignant tumors from benign masses in the breast. Clin Imaging 2001, 25:151-153.
62. Weinstein SP, Seghal C, Conant EF, Patton JA: Microcalcifications in breast tissue phantoms visualized with acoustic resonance coupled with power Doppler US: initial observations. Radiology 2002, 224:265-269.
63. Fatemi M, Wold LE, Alizad A, Greenleaf JF: Vibro-acoustic tissue mammography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002, 21:1-8.
64. Nightingale K, Soo MS, Nightingale R, Trahey G: Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: in vivo demonstration of clinical feasibility. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002, 28:227-235.
65. Hiltawsky KM, Kruger M, Starke C, et al.: Freehand ultrasound elastography of breast lesions: clinical results. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001, 27:1461-1469.
66. Doyley MM, Bamber JC, Fuechsel F, Bush NL: A freehand elastographic imaging approach for clinical breast imaging: system development and performance evaluation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001, 27:1347-1357.
67. Huber PE, Jenne JW, Rastert R, et al.: A new noninvasive approach in breast cancer therapy using magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery. Cancer Res 2001, 61:8441-8447.