The ethical bureaucracy

QJM: An International Journal of Medicine

Volumn 96, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 323-324

  Martyn, Christopher ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPETENCE; DECISION MAKING; EDITORIAL; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0038324444     PISSN: 14602725     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcg060     Document Type: Editorial

References (4)

1. Maskell NA, Jones EL, Davies RJO. Variations in experience in obtaining local ethical approval for participation in a multi-centre study. Q J Med 2003; 96:305-7.
2. Lux AL, Edwards SW, Osborne JP. Responses of local research ethics committees to a study with approval from a multicentre research ethic committee. Br Med J 2000; 320:1182-3.
3. Tully J, Ninis N, Booy R, Viner R. The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study. Br Med J 2000; 320:1179-82.
4. Paasche-Orlow MK, Taylor HA, Brancati FL. Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:721-6.