Evidence for a switch in the reproductive biology of rubus vidence for a switch in the reproductive biology of Rubus alceifolius (Rosaceae) towards apomixis, between its native range and its area of introduction

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 88, Issue 12, 2001, Pages 2243-2251

  Amsellem, Laurent ^a,b   Noyer, Jean Louis ^a   Hossaert Mckey, Martine ^b  

^a CIRAD   (France)

^b CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

Author keywords

Apomixis; Cytogenetics; Indian Ocean islands; Madagascar; Microsatellite markers; Reproductive biology; Rosaceae; Rubus alceifolius; Southeast Asia; SSR; Weeds

Indexed keywords

ROSACEAE; RUBUS; RUBUS ALCEIFOLIUS;

EID: 0038280697     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3558386     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. AALDERS, L. E., AND I. V. HALL. 1966. A cytotaxonomic survey of the native blackberries of Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 8: 528-532.
2. ALLARD, R. W. 1965. Genetic systems with colonizing ability in predominantly self-pollinated species. In H. G. Baker and G. L. Stebbins [eds.], The genetics of colonizing species, 49-75. Academic Press, London, UK.
3. AMSELLEM, L., M. H. CHEVALLIER, AND M. HOSSAERT-MCKEY. In press. Ploidy level of the invasive weed Rubus alceifolius (Rosaceae) between its native range and area of introduction. Plant Systematics and Evolution.
4. AMSELLEM, L., C. DUTECH, AND N. BILLOTTE. 2001. Isolation and characterisation of polymorphic microsatellite loci in Rubus alceifolius Poir. (Rosaceae), an invasive weed in La Réunion island. Molecular Ecology Notes 1: 33-35.
5. AMSELLEM, L., J. L. NOYER, T. LE BOURGEOIS, AND M. HOSSAERT-MCKEY. 2000. Comparison of genetic diversity of the invasive weed Rubus alceifolius Poir. (Rosaceae) in its native range and in areas of introduction, using AFLP markers. Molecular Ecology 9: 433-455.
6. ASKER, S. 1979. Progress in apomixis research. Hereditas 91: 231-240.
7. BAKER, H. G. 1957. Self-compatibility and establishment after long-distance dispersal. Evolution 9: 347-349.
8. BAMMI, R. K., AND H. P. OLMO. 1966. Cytogenetics of Rubus. V. Natural hybridisation between R. procerus P. J. Muell. and R. laciniatus Willd. Evolution 20: 617-633.
9. BARRETT, S. C. H., AND B. HUSBAND. 1990. The genetics of plant migration and colonisation. In A. H. D. Brown, M. T. Clegg, A. L. Kahler, and B. S. Weir [eds.], Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources, 254-277. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
10. BARRETT, S. C. H., AND B. J. RICHARDSON. 1986. Genetic attributes of invading species. In R. H. Groves and J. J. Burdon [eds.], Ecology of biological invasions: an Australian perspective, 21-33. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, Australia.
11. BROWN, A. H. D., AND D. R. MARSHALL. 1981. Evolutionary changes accompanying colonisation in plants. In G. E. C. Scudder and J. L. Reveal [eds.], Evolution Today, Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, 351-363. Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
12. BUSEMEYER, D. T., S. PELIKAN, R. S. KENNEDY, AND S. H. ROGSTAD. 1997. Genetic diversity of Philippines Rubus moluccanus L. (Rosaceae) populations examined with VNTR DNA probes. Journal of Tropical Ecology 14: 867-884.
13. CALZADA, J. P., C. F. CRANE, AND D. M. STEELY. 1996. Apomixis: the asexual revolution. Science 274: 1322-1323.
14. CRAIG, D. L. 1960. Studies on the cytology and the breeding behaviour of Rubus canadensis L. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 2: 96-102.
15. CUELLAR, O., AND A. G. KLUGE. 1972. Natural parthenogenesis in the gekkonid lizard Lepidodactylus lugubris. Journal of Genetics 61: 14-26.
16. DOUMS, C., M. A. PERDIEU, AND P. JARNE. 1997. Resource allocation and stressful conditions in the aphallic snail Bulinus truncatus. Ecology 79: 720-733.
17. EBERT, D., AND W. D. HAMILTON. 1996. Sex against virulence: the coevolution of parasitic diseases. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 79-82.
18. EINSET, J. 1951. Apomixis in American polyploid blackberries. American Journal of Botany 38: 768-772.
19. FRANKHAM, R. 1997. Do island populations have less genetic variation than mainland populations? Heredity 78: 311-327.
20. FRIEDMANN, F. 1997. Rosaceae. In J. Bosser, T. Cadet, W. Marais, and J. Guého [eds.], Flore des Mascareignes. La Réunion, Maurice, Rodrigues, 1-11. ORSTOM (Organisme de Recherche de Sciences et Techniques d'Outre-Mer), Paris, France.
21. GLEASON, H. A., AND A. CRONQUIST. 1991. Manual of the vascular plants of northeastern United States and Canada, 248-253. New York Botanical Garden, New York, New York, USA.
22. GUSTAFSSON, A. 1943. The genesis of the European blackberry flora. Acta Universitatis Lund 39: 1-200.
23. HOLSINGER, K. E. 2000. Reproductive systems and evolution in vascular plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 97: 7037-7042.
24. HUSBAND, B. C., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1991. Colonisation history and population genetic structure of Eichhornia paniculata in Jamaica. Heredity 66: 287-296.
25. JAENICK, J. 1978. A hypothesis to account for the maintenance of sex within populations. Evolutionary Theory 3: 191-194.
26. KALKMANN, C. 1993. Rosaceae. In Foundation Flora Malesiana [eds.], Flora Malesiana, Series I, Spermatophyta: flowering plants, vol. 11, 227-351. Rijksherbarium, Leiden, The Netherlands.
27. KIRCHNER, J., AND J. STEPANEK. 1996. Modes of speciation and evolution of the sections in Taraxacum. Folia Geobotanica Phytotaxonomica 31: 415-426.
28. KOLLMANN, J., T. STEINGER, AND B. A. ROY. 2000. Evidence of sexuality in European Rubus (Rosaceae) species based on AFLP and allozyme analysis. American Journal of Botany 87: 1592-1598.
29. KRAFT. T., AND H. NYBOM. 1995. DNA fingerprinting and biometry can solve some taxonomic problems in apomictic blackberries (Rubus subgen. Rubus). Watsonia 20: 329-343.
30. KRAFT, T., H. NYBOM, AND G. WERLEMARK. 1996. DNA fingerprint variation in some blackberry species (Rubus subgen. Rubus, Rosaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 199: 93-108.
31. LAVERGNE, R. 1978. Les pestes végétales de l'île de La Réunion. Info-nature Ile de La Réunion 16: 9-59.
32. LIVELY, C. M. 1987. Evidence from a New Zealand snail for the maintenance of sex by parasitism. Nature 328: 519-521.
33. LOBET, E., AND J. TRIOLO. 1999. Etude de la banque de graines du sol d'une espèce envahissante, Rubus alceifolius Poiret, à La Réunion. Mémoire de Maîtrise de Biologie des Populations et des Ecosystèmes, Université de La Réunion, France.
34. MANTON, I. 1950. Problems of cytology and evolution in the Pteridophyta. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
35. MARSHALL, D. R., AND A. H. D. BROWN. 1981. The evolution of apomixis. Heredity 47: 1-15.
36. MUELLER-DOMBOIS, D. 1981. Fire in tropical ecosystems. In H. A. Mooney, T. M. Bonnicksen, N. L. Christensen, J. E. Lotan, and W. A. Reiners [eds.], Proceedings of Conference on Fire Regimes and Ecosystem Properties, 37-76. US Forest Service, Genetic Technical Report WO-26, Massachusetts, USA.
37. NYBOM, H. 1985. Pollen viability assessments in blackberries (Rubus subgen. Rubus). Plant Systematics and Evolution 150: 281-290.
38. NYBOM, H. 1986. Chromosome numbers and reproduction in Rubus subgen. Malachobatus. Plant Systematics and Evolution 152: 211-218.
39. NYBOM, H. 1988. Apomixis versus sexuality in blackberries (Rubus subgen. Rubus, Rosaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 160: 207-218.
40. NYBOM, H. 1995. Evaluation of interspecific crossing experiments in facultative apomict blackberries (Rubus subgen. Rubus) using DNA finger-printing. Hereditas 122: 57-65.
41. OSTROWSKI, M. F., P. JARNE, AND P. DAVID. 2000. Quantitative genetics of sexual plasticity: the Environmental Threshold Model and genotype-by-environment interaction for phallus development in the snail Bulinus truncatus. Evolution 54: 1614-1625.
42. OWADALLY, M. 1960. Some forest pests and diseases in Mauritius. Revue Agriculture Sucrièrs de l'île Maurice 59: 76-94.
43. PICKETT, S. T. A. 1976. Succession: an evolutionary interpretation. American Naturalist 110: 107-119.
44. PLASCHKE, J., M. W. GANAL, AND M. S. RÖDER. 1995. Detection of genetic diversity in closely related bread wheat using microsatellite markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91: 1001-1007.
45. PRATT, C., AND J. EINSET. 1955. Development of the embryo sac in some American blackberries. American Journal of Botany 42: 637-645.
46. PRICE, S. C., AND S. K. JAIN. 1981. Are inbreeders better colonisers? Oecologia 49: 283-286.
47. RICHARDS, A. J. 1986. Plant breeding systems. Unwin, London, UK.
48. RIVALS, P. 1960. Les espèces fruitières introduites à l'île de La Réunion (Notes historiques et biologiques). Travaux du laboratoire forestier de Toulouse, 1: art. 3. Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
49. SCHLÖTTERER, C., AND D. TAUTZ. 1993. Slippage synthesis of microsatellites. Nucleic Acids Research 20: 211-215.
50. SELANDER, R. K. 1983. Evolutionary consequences of inbreeding. In C. M. Schonewald-Cox, S. M. Chambers, B. MacBryde, and W. L. Thomas [eds.], Genetics and conservation, 201-215. Benjamin/Cummings, San Francisco, California, USA.
51. SIGALA, P., AND C. LAVERGNE. 1996. Les plantes exotiques envahissantes des forêts de l'île de La Réunion: perspectives de lutte biologique. In Office National de Forêts [Ed.], IXème Symposium international sur le contrôle biologique des mauvaises herbes (21-26 Janvier) - Afrique du Sud. ONF, Paris, France.
52. STEBBINS, G. L. 1950. Variation and evolution in higher plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
53. TACHIDA, H., AND M. IZUKA. 1992. Persistence of repeated sequences that evolve by replication slippage. Genetics 131: 471-478.
54. THÉBAUD, C. 1989. Contribution à l'étude des plantes étrangères envahissantes à La Réunion. Institut de Recherche Agronomique Tropicale-Office National des Forêts, La Réunion, France.
55. THOMAS, P. B. 1940. Reproductive versatility in Rubus. II. The chromosomes and development. Journal of Genetics 40: 119-128.
56. THOMPSON, M. M. 1997. Survey of chromosome numbers in Rubus (Rosaceae: Rosideae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 84: 128-164.
57. VALDES, A. M., M. SLATKIN, AND N. B. FREIMER. 1993. Allele frequencies at microsatellite loci: the stepwise mutation model revisited. Genetics 133: 737-749.
58. VAN THUAN, N. 1968. Flore du Cambodge, du Laos, et du Vietnam. Fascicule 7: Rosaceae II (Rubus). Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
59. VAN THUAN, N. 1970. Flora of Thailand, vol. II, 46-61. Thailand Institute of Science and Technological Research, Bangkok, Thailand.
60. VAUGHAN, R. E. 1937. Catalogue of the flowering plants in the herbarium Mauritius. Bulletin of the Mauritius Institute 1: 1-120.
61. VIARD, F., F. JUSTY, AND P. JARNE. 1997. The influence of self-fertilization and population dynamics on the genetic structure of subdivided populations: a case study using microsatellite markers in the freshwater snail Bulinus truncatus. Evolution 51: 1518-1528.
62. WATKINSON, A. R., AND J. C. POWELL. 1993. Seedling recruitment and the maintenance of clonal diversity in plant populations - a computer simulation of Ranunculus repens. Journal of Ecology 81: 707-717.
63. WEBER, H. E. 1995. Rubus. In H. J. Conert and G. Hegi [eds.], Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa, 3rd ed., vol. 4.2a, 284-595. Blackwell, Berlin, Germany.
64. WEBER, H. E. 1996. Former and modern taxonomic treatment of the apomictic Rubus complex. Folia Geobotanica Phytotaxonomica 31: 373-380.
65. WIGBOLDUS, J. S. 1994. The spread of crops into sub-equatorial Africa during the Early Iron Age. Azania: Journal of the British Institute in Eastern Africa, 29-30: 253-269.