Evidence of sexuality in European Rubus (Rosaceae) species based on AFLP and allozyme analysis

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 87, Issue 11, 2000, Pages 1592-1598

  Kollmann, Johannes ^a,b   Steinger, Thomas ^a   Roy, Barbara A ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

AFLP; Allozymes; Clonal uniformity; Pollination experiment; Pseudogamy; Rosaceae; Rubus

Indexed keywords

RUBUS; RUBUS ARMENIACUS; RUBUS BIFRONS;

EID: 0033676395     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2656735     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. ANTONIUS, K., AND H. NYBOM. 1994. DNA fingerprinting reveals significant amounts of genetic variation in a wild raspberry Rubus idaeus population. Molecular Ecology 3: 177-180.
2. _, AND _. 1995. Discrimination between sexual recombination and apomixis/automixis in a Rubus plant breeding programme. Hereditas 123: 205-213.
3. ASKER, S., AND L. JERLING. 1992. Apomixis in plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
4. BAMMI, R. K., AND H. P. OLMO. 1966. Cytogenetics of Rubus. V. Natural hybridization between R. procerus P. J. Muell. and R. laciniatus Willd. Evolution 20: 617-633.
5. BARKER, J. H. A., M. MATTHES, G. M. ARNOLD, K. J. EDWARDS, I. ÅHMAN, S. LARSSON, AND A. KARP. 1999. Characterisation of genetic diversity in potential biomass willows (Salix spp.) by RAPD and AFLP analyses. Genome 42: 173-183.
6. BERGER, X. 1953. Untersuchungen über die Embryologie partiell apomiktischer Rubusbastarde. Berichte der Schweizerischen Botanischen Gesellschaft 63: 224-266.
7. CHRISTEN, X. 1950. Untersuchungen über die Embryologie pseudogamer und sexueller Rubusarten. Berichte der Schweizerischen Botanischen Gesellschaft 60: 153-198.
8. COUSINEAU, J. C., AND D. J. DONNELLY. 1992. Use of isoenzyme analysis to characterize raspberry cultivars and detect cultivar mislabeling. Hortscience 27: 1023-1025.
9. CRANE, M. B. 1940. Reproductive versatility in Rubus. I. Morphology and inheritance. Journal of Genetics 40: 109-118.
10. _, AND C. D. DARLINGTON. 1927. The origin of new forms in Rubus. Genetica 9: 241-278.
11. CZAPIK, R. 1981. Elementary apomictic processes in Rubus L. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 50: 201-204.
12. DAFNI, A. 1992. Pollination ecology: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
13. DOWRICK, G. J. 1961. Biology of reproduction in Rubus. Nature 191: 680-682.
14. _. 1966. Breeding systems in tetraploid Rubus species. Genetical Research 7: 245-253.
15. ELLSTRAND, N. C., AND M. L. ROOSE. 1987. Patterns of genotypic diversity in clonal plant species. American Journal of Botany 74: 123-131.
16. ERIKSSON, O., AND B. BREMER. 1993. Genet dynamics of the clonal plant Rubus saxatilis. Journal of Ecology 81: 533-542.
17. FINN, C. E. 1996. Emasculated trailing blackberry flowers set some drupelets when not protected from cross pollination. HortScience 31: 1035.
18. FOCKE, W. O. 1881. Die Pflanzenmischlinge. Bornträger, Berlin, Germany.
19. GRAHAM, J., AND R. J. MCNICOL. 1995. An examination of the ability of RAPD markers to determine the relationships within and between Rubus species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 90: 1128-1132.
20. GUITIÁN, J., AND M. FUENTES. 1992. Reproductive biology of Crataegus monogyna in northwestern Spain. Acta Oecologica 13: 3-11.
21. GUSTAFSSON, A. 1930. Kastrierung und Pseudogamie bei Rubus. Botaniska Notiser 1930: 477-494.
22. HAMRICK, J. L., D. A. MURAWSKI, AND J. D. NASON. 1993. The influence of seed dispersal mechanisms on the genetic structure of tropical tree populations. Vegetatio 107/108: 281-297.
23. HASKELL, G. 1960. Role of the male parent in crosses involving apomictic Rubus species. Heredity 14: 101-113.
24. HERRERA, C. M. 1984. A study of avian frugivores, bird-dispersed plants, and their interaction in Mediterranean scrublands. Ecological Monographs 54: 1-23.
25. _. 1987. Vertebrate-dispersed plants of the Iberian peninsula: a study of fruit characteristics. Ecological Monographs 57: 305-331.
26. HOLDEREGGER, R. 1996. Reproduction of the rare monocarpic species Saxifraga mutata L. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 122: 301-313.
27. JENNINGS, D. L., D. L. CRAIG, AND P. B. TOPHAM. 1967. The role of the male parent in the reproduction of Rubus. Heredity 22: 43-55.
28. JORDANO, P. 1982. Migrant birds are the main seed dispersers of blackberries in southern Spain. Oikos 38: 183-193.
29. _. 1984. Seed weight variation and differential avian dispersal in blackberries Rubus ulmifolius. Oikos 43: 149-153.
30. _. 1995. Frugivore-mediated selection on fruit and seed size: birds and St. Lucie's cherry, Prunus mahaleb. Ecology 76: 2627-2639.
31. KERR, E. A. 1954. Seed development in blackberries. Canadian Journal of Botany 32: 654-672.
32. KOLLMANN, J., AND B. SCHNEIDER. 1997. Effects of landscape structure on seed dispersal of fleshy-fruited species along forest edges. Bulletin of the Geobotanical Institute ETH 63: 77-86.
33. KRAFT, T., AND H. NYBOM. 1995. DNA fingerprinting and biometry can solve some taxonomic problems in apomictic blackberries (Rubus subgen. Rubus). Watsonia 20: 329-343.
34. _, _, AND G. WERLEMARK. 1996. DNA fingerprint variation in some blackberry species (Rubus subg. Rubus, Rosaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 199: 93-108.
35. LEVEY, D. J. 1986. Methods of seed processing by birds and seed deposition patterns. In A. Estrada and T. H. Fleming [eds.], Frugivores and seed dispersal, 147-158. Junk, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
36. LOVELESS, M. D., AND J. L. HAMRICK. 1984. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15: 65-95.
37. MATZKE-HAJEK, G. 1997. Zur Evolution und Ausbreitung apomiktischer Rubus-Arten (Rosaceae) in Offenland-Ökosystemen. Bulletin of the Geobotanical Institute ETH 63: 33-44.
38. MURRAY, K. G., K. WINNETT-MURRAY, E. A. CROMIE, M. MINOR, AND E. MEYERS. 1993. The influence of seed packaging and fruit color on feeding preferences of American robins. Vegetatio 107/108: 217-226.
39. NEI, M., AND W. H. LI. 1979. Mathematical models for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 76: 5269-5273.
40. NYBOM, H. 1980. Germination in Swedish blackberries (Rubus L., subgen. Rubus). Botaniska Notiser 133: 619-631.
41. _. 1986. Active self-pollination and pollen stainability in some Rubus cultivars. The Journal of Horticultural Science 61: 49-55.
42. _. 1988. Apomixis versus sexuality in blackberries (Rubus subgen. Rubus, Rosaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 160: 207-218.
43. _. 1993. Applications of DNA fingerprinting in plant population studies. In S. D. J. Pena, R. Chakraborty, J. T. Epplen, and A. J. Jeffreys [eds.], DNA fingerprinting: State of the science, 293-309. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
44. _. 1995. Evaluation of interspecific crossing experiments in facultatively apomictic blackberries (Rubus subgen. Rubus) using DNA fingerprinting. Hereditas 122: 57-65.
45. _, AND B. A. SCHAAL. 1990. DNA "fingerprints" reveal genotypic distributions in natural populations of blackberries and raspberries (Rubus, Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany 77: 883-888.
46. PEET, R. K. 1974. The measurement of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5: 285-307.
47. PIPER, J. K. 1986. Seasonality of fruit characters and seed removal by birds. Oikos 46: 303-310.
48. ROY, B. A. 1993. Patterns of rust infection as a function of host genetic diversity and host density in natural populations of the apomictic crucifer, Arabis holboellii. Evolution 47: 111-124.
49. _. 1995. The breeding system of six species of Arabis (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 869-877.
50. SALLABANKS, R. 1993. Hierarchical mechanisms of fruit selection by an avian frugivore. Ecology 74: 1326-1336.
51. SANCHEZ, G., S. RESTREPO, M.-C. DUQUE, M. FREGENE, M. BONIERBALE, AND V. VERDIER. 1999. AFLP assessment of genetic variability in cassava accessions (Manihot esculenta) resistant and susceptible to the cassava bacterial blight (CBB). Genome 42: 163-172.
52. SNOW, B., AND D. SNOW. 1988. Birds and berries. Poyser, Calton, UK.
53. SOLTIS, D. E., C. H. HAUFLER, D. C. DARROW, AND G. J. GASTONY. 1983. Starch electrophoresis of ferns: a compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers, and staining schedules. American Fern Journal 73: 9-27.
54. STEINER, T., C. KÖRNER, AND B. SCHMID. 1996. Long-term persistence in a changing climate: DNA analysis suggests very old ages of clones of alpine Carex curvula. Oecologia 105: 94-99.
55. TEIFION-JONES, A., AND J. MCGAVIN-WENDY. 1998. Infectibility and sensitivity of UK raspberry, blackberry and hybrid berry cultivars to Rubus viruses. Annals of Applied Biology 132: 239-251.
56. VOS, P., R. HOGERS, M. BLEEKER, M. REIJANS, T. VAN DE LEE, M. HORNES, A. FRIJTERS, J. POT, J. PELEMAN, M. KUIPER, AND M. ZABEAU. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 4407-4414.
57. WATKINSON, A.R., AND J.C. POWELL. 1993. Seedling recruitment and the maintenance of clonal diversity in plant populations - a computer simulation of Ranunculus repens. Journal of Ecology 81: 707-717.
58. WAUGH, R., W. T. G. VAN DE VEN, M. S. PHILLIPS, AND W. POWELL. 1990. Chloroplast DNA diversity in the genus Rubus (Rosaceae) revealed by Southern hybridization. Plant Systematics and Evolution 172: 65-75.
59. WEBER, H. E. 1987. Beiträge zu einer Revision der Gattung Rubus L. in der Schweiz. Botanica Helvetica 97: 117-133.
60. _. 1995. Rubus. In H. J. Conert et al. [eds.], Gustav Hegi - Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa, 3rd. ed., Vol. 4.2a, 284-595. Blackwell, Berlin, Germany.
61. WENDEL, J. F, AND N. F. WEEDEN. 1989. Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. In D. E. Soltis and P. S. Soltis [eds.], Isozymes in plant biology, 5-45. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon, USA.
62. WILLIAMSON, B., W. A. BREESE, AND R. C. SHATTOCK. 1995. A histological study of downy mildew (Peronospora rubi) infection of leaves, flowers and developing fruits of Tummelberry and other Rubus spp. Mycological Research 99: 1311-1316.