The Challenge and Attainability of Goals for Adequate Yearly Progress

Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 26-33

  Schwarz, Richard D ^a   Yen, Wendy M ^b   Schafer, William D ^c  

^a CTB MCGRAW HILL   (United States)

^b ETS K 12 Works   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038267819     PISSN: 07311745     EISSN: 17453992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2001.tb00067.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Angoff, W. H. (1971) Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In R. L. Thorndike, (Ed.), Educational measurement. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
2. Arce-Ferrer, A., Frisbie, D. A., & Kolen, M. J. (2000, April) Standard errors of proportions used in reporting changes in group performance with achievement levels. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans.
3. Baker, A. P., & Xu, D. (1995) The measure of education: A review of the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System. Nashville, TN: Office of Education Accountability.
4. Blank, R. K., Manise, J. G., & Brathwaite, B. C. (1999) State education indicators with a focus on Title I. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers, U.S. Department of Education.
5. CTB/McGraw-Hill. (1996) TerraNova (Form A). Monterey CA, Author.
6. CTB/McGraw-Hill. (1992) Maryland School Performance Assessment Program: Final technical report. Monterey, CA Author.
7. Entwisle, D. R., & Alexander, K. L. (1992) Summer setback race, poverty, school composition, and mathematics achievement in the first two years of school. American Sociological Review, 57, 72–84.
8. Grissmer, D., & Flanagan, A. (1998) Exploring rapid achievement gains in North Carolina and Texas. National Education Goals Panel.
9. Hambleton, R. K. (1998) Setting performance standards on achievement tests: Meeting the requirements of Title I. In L. N. Hansche, (Ed.), Handbook for the development of performance standards: Meeting the requirements of Title I. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Education and the Council of Chief State School Officers. Bethesda, MD: Publication design by Frost Associates, Ltd.
10. Jimerson, S., Egeland, B., & Teo, A. (1999) A longitudinal study of achievement trajectories: Factors associated with change. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 116–126.
11. Lewis, D. M., Mitzel, H. C., & Green, D. R. (1996) Standard setting: A bookmark approach. In D. R. Green (Chair), IRT-based standard-setting procedures utilizing behavioral anchoring. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Council of Chief State School Officers National Conference on Large Scale Assessment, Phoenix, Arizona.
12. Linn, R. L., & Baker, E. L. (1999) Standards-based accountability systems' adequate yearly progress absolutes, wishful thinking, and norms. The CRESST Line (Spring).
13. Millman, J. (1997) How do I judge thee? Let me count the ways. In J. Millman, (Ed.), Grading teachers, grading schools: Is student achievement a valid evaluation measure? Thousand Oaks, CA Corwin Press.
14. Reese, C. M., Miller, K. E., Mazzeo, J., & Dossey, J. A. (1997) NAEP 1996 mathematics report card for the nation and the states. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, National Assessment of Educational Progress.
15. Rogosa, D. (2000) Interpretive notes for the academic performance index. California Department of Education.
16. Thum, Y. M., & Bryk, A. S. (1997) Value-added productivity indicators: the Dallas system. In J. Millman, (Ed.), Grading teachers, grading schools: Is student achievement a valid evaluation measure? Thousand Oaks, CA Corwin Press.
17. Yen, W. M. (1997) The technical quality of performance assessments: Standard errors of percents of students reaching standards. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16, 5–15.
18. Yen, W. M., & Ferrara, S. (1997) The Mary-land School Performance Assessment Program: Performance assessment with psychometric quality suitable for high stakes usage. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 60–84.