Subordinate appraisals of managers: Lessons from a state agency

Review of Public Personnel Administration

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 68-79

  Coggburn, Jerrell D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038260393     PISSN: 0734371X     EISSN: 1552759X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0734371X9801800105     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Auteri, E. (1994, June). Upward feedback leads to culture change. HR Magazine, 6, 78-84.
2. Bernardin, H.J., SCDAHmus, S.A. & Redmon, G. (1993). Attitudes of first-line supervisors toward subordinate appraisals. Human Resources Management, 32, 315-324.
3. Bernardin, H.J. & Beatty, R.W. (1987, Summer). Can subordinate appraisals enhance managerial productivity? Sloan Management Review, 63-73.
4. Bernardin, H.J. & Cascio, W.F. (1987). Performance appraisal and the law. In R. Schuler (Ed.), Readings in Personnel/Human Resources. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
5. Bernardin, H.J. (1986). Subordinate appraisal: A valuable source of information about managers. Human Resource Management, 25 (3), 421-39.
6. Bernardin, H.J. & Beatty, R.W. (1984). Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work. Boston, MA: Kent Publishing.
7. Bowman, J.S. (1994). At last, an alternative to performance appraisal: Total quality management. Public Administration Review, 54 (2), 129-136.
8. Daley, D.M. (1992). Performance appraisal in the public sector. Westport, CT Quorum Books.
9. deLeon, L. & Ewen, A.J. (1997). Multi-source performance appraisals. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 17 (1), 22-36.
10. Deming, W.E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
11. DiIulio, J. J., (Ed.). (1994). Deregulating the public service: Can government be improved? Washington, DC: The Brookmgs Institute.
12. England, R.E. & Parle, W.M. (1987). Nonmanagerial performance appraisal practices in large American cities. Public Administration Review, 47(6), 498-504.
13. Feild, H. & Holley, W. (1975, May/June). Performance appraisal: An analysis of state-wide practices. Public Personnel Management, 4, 145-150.
14. Fox, C.J. (1991). Employee performance appraisal: The keystone made of clay. In C. Ban & N. Riccucci (Eds.), Public personnel management. Current concerns-Future challenges. White Plains, NY: Longman.
15. Hays, S.W. & Graham, C.B., Jr. (1993). Managing the public organization, (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
16. Hazucha, J.F., Hezlett, S.A. & Schneider, R.J. (1993). The impact of 360-degree feedback on management skill development. Human Resource Management, 32, 325-351.
17. Horner, C. (1988, Spring). Beyond Mr. Gradgrind: The case for deregulating the public sector. Policy Review, 44, 34-8.
18. Kelman, S. (1990). Procurement and public management: The fear of discretion and the quality of government performance. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
19. Latham, G.P. & Wexley, K.N. (1981). Increasing productivity through performance appraisal. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20. Maurer, T.J. & Tarulli, B.A. (1996). Acceptance of peer/upward performance appraisal systems: Role of work context factors and beliefs about managers' development capability. Human Resources Management, 35, 217-241.
21. McEvoy, G.M. (1990). Public sector managers' reactions to appraisal by subordinates. Public Personnel Management, 19, 201-212.
22. McEvoy, G.M. (1988, September). Evaluating the boss. Personnel Administrator, 115-120.
23. Mount, M.K. (1984). Psychometric properties of subordinate ratings of managerial performance. Personnel Psychology, 37, 687-702.
24. Moussavi, F. & Ashbaugh, D.L. (1995). Perceptual effects of participative, goal-oriented performance appraisal: A field study in public agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5, 331-343.
25. Nalbandian, J. (1981). Performance appraisal: If only people were not involved. Public Administration Review, 41 (3), 392-396.
26. National Association of State Budget Officers [NASBO] (1995). Workforce policies: State activity and innovations. Washington, DC: NASBO.
27. National Association of State Personnel Executives [NASPE] (1996). State personnel office: Roles and functions, (3rd ed.). Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments.
28. National Commission on the State and Local Public Service [Winter Commission] (1993). Hard truths/Tough choices. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute of Government.
29. Nevels, P. (1989, December). Why employees are being asked to rate their supervisors. Supervisory Management, 5-11.
30. Osborne, D.E., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Plume.
31. Roberts, G.E. & Reed, T. (1996). Performance appraisal participation, goal setting and feedback. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 16 (4), 22-36.
32. Thayer, F. (1987). Performance appraisal and merit pay systems: The disasters multiply. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 7 (2), 36-53.
33. Tyer, C.B. (1982, Fall). Employee performance appraisal in American state governments. Public Personnel Management, 11, 199-212.
34. Wilson, J.Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
35. Yeager, S.J., Rabin, J. & Vocmo, T. (1985). Feedback and administrative behavior in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 45, 570-575.