Appraisal of family doctors: An evaluation study

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 53, Issue 491, 2003, Pages 454-460

  Lewis, Malcolm ^a   Elwyn, Glyn ^b   Wood, Fiona ^c  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Appraisal; Peer led; Performance; Primary care; Quality standards

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EMPLOYER; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH SURVEY; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PEER REVIEW; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PILOT STUDY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; VOLUNTEER;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PEER REVIEW; PILOT PROJECTS; WALES;

EID: 0038240518     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Deming WE. Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Institute for Advanced Engineering Study, 1986.
2. Plsek PE, Wilson T. Complexity science: Complexity, leadership, and management in healthcare organisations. BMJ 2001; 323: 746-749.
3. Department of Health. Supporting Doctors, Protecting Patients. London: The Stationery Office, 1999.
4. Fletcher C. Performance appraisal in context: Organisational changes and their impact on practice. In: Anderson N, Herriot P (eds). Assessment and Selection in Organizations. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1994.
5. General Medical Council. Revalidating Doctors. London: GMC, 2000.
6. Smith R. All changed, changed utterly. BMJ 1998; 316: 1917-1918.
7. Department of Health. Learning from Bristol. The Department of Health's Response to the Report of the Public Inquiry Into Children's Heart Surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995. London: The Stationery Office, 2002.
8. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Riley C. Managing revalidation in general practice. Clinician in Management 1999; 8: 193-197.
9. Armstrong M. A Handbook of Personnel Management. London: Kogan Page, 1984.
10. School of Health and Related Research. Appraisal for GPs. Sheffield: SHaRR, 2001.
11. National Assembly for Wales. Maximising Clinical Performance. Cardiff: National Assembly for Wales, 2000.
12. General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. 1997, London: GMC, 1997.
13. Central Consultants and Specialists Committee. Appraisal for Senior Hospital Doctors: Statement from the Central Consultants and Specialists Committee. London: British Medical Association, 1998.
14. American Board of Internal Medicine. Recertification: Program for continuous professional development. http://www.abim.org/cpd/cpdhome/index.htm (accessed April 2003).
15. Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, et al. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA 1993; 269: 655-660.
16. Fidler H, Lockyer JM, Toews J, Violato C. Changing physicians' practices: The effect of individual feedback. Acad Med 1999; 74: 702-714 http://www.academicmedicine.org/cgi/content/abstract/74/6/702 (Accessed April 2003).
17. Jelley D, Van Zwanenberg T. Peer appraisal in general practice: A descriptive study in the Northern Deanery. Educ Gen Pract 2000; 11: 281-287.
18. Elwyn G. Professional and practice development plans for primary care. [Editorial]. BMJ 1998; 316: 1619-1620.
19. Elwyn G, Carlisle S, Hocking P, Smail S. Practice and professional development plans (PPDPs): Results of a feasibility study. BMC Fam Pract 2001; 2: 1. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/2/1 (Accessed April 2003).
20. Dodd M, Rutt G, Illing J. A system of appraisal for general practice trainers: A pilot study. Educ Prim Care 2002; 13: 48-54.