Gendered social indicators and grounded theory

Feminist Economics

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-18

  Austen, Siobhan ^a   Jefferson, Therese ^a   Thein, Vicki ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Feminist methodology; Focus groups; Grounded theory; Qualitative research; Social indicators; Women's status

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038239145     PISSN: 13545701     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1354570032000063065     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adler, Nancy J, Nigel Campbell, and Andre Laurent. 1989. "In Search of Appropriate Methodology: From Outside the People's Republic of China Looking In." Journal of International Business Studies 20: 61-74.
2. Aslaksen, Iulie, Ane Flaatten, and Charlotte Koren. 1999. "Introduction: Quality of Life Indicators." Feminist Economics 5(2): 79-82.
3. Austen, Siobhan, Alison Preston, and Therese Jefferson. 2000a. "Measuring Women's Progress: Issues and Indicators." Report prepared for the Women's Policy Development Office of Western Australia.
4. _, Alison Preston, and Therese Jefferson. 2000b. "Women at the End of the Millennium." Report prepared for the Women's Policy Development Office of Western Australia.
5. _, Therese Jefferson, and Vicki Thein. 2001. How Much Further? Women's Progress, Goals and Status in Western Australia Perth: Women's Economic Policy Analysis Unit. On-line. Available http://www.curtin.edu.au/research/wepau/latestpublication.cfm. (October 2001).
6. Barth, Frederik. 1999. "Comparing Lives." Feminist Economics 5(2): 95-8.
7. Basu, Alaka Malwade. 1992. "The Status of Women and the Quality of Life among the Poor." Cambridge Journal of Economics 16: 249-67.
8. Browning, Larry D, Janice M. Beyer, and Judy C. Shetler. 1995. "Building Cooperation in a Competitive Industry: SEMATECH and the Semiconductor Industry." Academy of Management Journal 38: 113-51.
9. Búrca, Seán D. and Damien McLoughlin. 1998. "Business Network Research: A Grounded Theory Approach," in Peter Naude and Peter W. Turnbull (eds.) Network Dynamics in International Marketing, 1st edn., pp. 89-111. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
10. Carley, Michael. 1981. Social Measurements and Social Indicators: Issues of Policy and Theory. London: Alien & Unwin.
11. Danner, Mona, Lucia Fort, and Gay Young. 1999. "International Data on Women and Gender: Resources, Issues, Critical Use." Women's Studies International Forum 22(2): 249-59.
12. Deacon, Desley. 1985. "Political Arithmetic: The Nineteenth Century Australian Census and the Construction of the Dependent Woman." Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 11(1): 27-47.
13. Durbin, Elizabeth. 1999. "Towards a Gendered Human Poverty Measure." Feminist Economics 5(2): 105-8.
14. Flynn, Patrice. 1999. "Contributions Feminist Economists Can Make to the Quality of Life Movement." Feminist Economics 5(2): 133-7.
15. Folbre, Nancy. 1991. "The Unproductive Housewife: Her Evolution in Nineteenth Century Economic Thought." Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 16(3): 463-84.
16. _. 1994. Who Pays for the Kids? Gender and the Structures of Constraint. London: Routledge.
17. Glaser, Barney and Anselm Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
18. Harding, Sandra. 1987. "Is there a Feminist Method?" in Sandra Harding (ed.) Feminism and Methodology, pp. 1-14. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
19. Himmelweit, Susan. 1995. "The Discovery of 'Unpaid Work': The Social Consequences of the Expansion of 'Work'." Feminist Economics 1(2): 1-19.
20. Hirschfield, Mary L. 1997. "Methodological Stance and Consumption Theory: A Lesson in Feminist Methodology," in John B. Davis (ed.) New Economics and Its History, pp. 190-211. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
21. Hirschman, Elizabeth C. and Craig J. Thompson. 1997. "Why Media Matter: Toward a Richer Understanding of Consumers' Relationships with Advertising and Mass Media." Journal of Advertising 26: 43-60.
22. Keddy, Barbara, Sharon L. Sims, and Phyllis Noerager Stern. 1996. "Grounded Theory as Feminist Research Methodology." Journal of Advanced Nursing 25(3): 448-53.
23. Leonard-Barton, Dorothy. 1990. "A Dual Methodology for Case Studies: Synergistic Use of a Longitudinal Single Site with Replicated Multiple Sites." Organization Science 1: 248-67.
24. Mohiuddin, Yasmeen. 1996. "Country Rankings by the Status of Women Index" Presented to the Conference of the International Association for Feminist Economists, June 21-23.
25. Montell, Frances. 1999. "Focus Group Interviews: A New Feminist Method." NWSA Journal 11(1) Spring: 44.
26. Morse, Janice M. 1994. "Designing Funded Qualitative Research," in Norman K. Denzin, and Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 220-235. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Naess, Siri. 1999. "Subjective Approach to Quality of Life." Feminist Economics 5(2): 115-88.
28. O'Hara, Sabine U. 1999. "Economics, Ecology and Quality of life: Who Evaluates?" Feminist Economics 5(2): 83-9.
29. Orlikowski, Wanda J. 1993. "CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Increment." Management Information Systems Quarterly 17(3): 309-11.
30. Scott, Judy E. 2000. "Facilitating Interorganisational Learning with Information Technology." Journal of Management Information Systems 17(2): 81-113.
31. Strassmann, Diana. 1997. "Expanding the Methodological Boundaries of Economics." Feminist Economics 3(2): vii-ix.
32. Van Aken, Eileen, Dominic Monetta, and Scott Sink. 1994. "Affinity Groups: the Missing Link in Employee Involvement." Organisational Dynamics 22(4): 38-55.
33. Van Staveren, Irene. 1997. "Focus Groups: Contributing to a Gender-Aware Methodology." Feminist Economics 3(2): 131-5.