Prospective study of hemodynamic performances of standard ATS and AP-ATS valves

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 341-347

  Labrousse, Louis M ^a   Choukroun, Emmanuel ^a   Serena, Donato ^a   Billes, Marc Alain ^a   Francesco, Madonna ^a   Deville, Claude ^a  

^a BORDEAUX UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BODY SURFACE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; TREATMENT INDICATION; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0038209084     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Krayenbuehl HP, Hess OM, Monrad ES, Schneider J, Mall G, Turina M. Left ventricular myocardial structure in aortic valve disease before, intermediate, and later after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 1989;79:744-755
2. Jin XY, Zhang ZM, Gibson DG, Yacoub MH, Pepper JR. Effects of valve substitute on changes in left ventricular function and hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:683-690
3. Del Rizzo DF, Abdoh A, Cartier PC, David TE, Doty DB, Westaby S. Factors affecting LV mass regression following AVR with stentless valves. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11(suppl.I):I-114-I-120
4. Abdelnoor M, Hall KV, Nitter-Hauge S, Lindberg H, Ovrum E. Prognostic factors in aortic valve replacement associated with narrow aortic roots. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986;20:227-232
5. Kratz JM, Sade RM, Crawford FA, Jr., Crumbley AJ, Stroud MR. The risk of small St. Jude aortic valve prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:1114-1119
6. Rao V, Jamieson WR, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, David TE. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2000;102(19 suppl.3):III5-III9
7. Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 1978;58:20-24
8. DePaulis R, Sommariva L, Russo F. Doppler echocardiography evaluation of the CarboMedics valve in patients with small aortic annulus and valve prosthesis-body surface area mismatch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:57-62
9. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1131-1141
10. Edmunds LH, Clark RE, Cohn LH, Grunkemeier GL, Miller C, Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:932-935
11. Christakis GT, Joyner C, Morgan CD, et al. Left ventricular mass regression early following aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1084-1089
12. McDonald ML, Daly RC, Schaff HV, Mullany CJ, Miller FA, Morris JJ, Orszulak TA. Hemodynamic performance of small aortic valve bioprostheses: Is there a difference? Ann Thorac Surg 1997,63:362-366
13. Medalion B, Blackstone EH, Lytle BW, White J, Arnold JH, Cosgrove DM. Aortic valve replacement: Is valve size important? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:963-974
14. Cochran RP, Kunzelman KS. Discrepancies between labeled and actual dimensions of prosthetic valves and sizers. J Card Surg 1996;11:318-324
15. Walther T, Falk V, Diegeler A, Rauch T, Autschbach R, Mohr FW. Discrepancy of sizers for conventional and stentless aortic valve implants. J Heart Valve Dis 1997;6:145-148
16. Bonchek LI. Why aren't valve sizers and prostheses labeled accurately? Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:984-985
17. Barbetseas J, Zoghbi WA. Evaluation of prosthetic valve function and associated complications. Valvular Heart Dis Cardiol Clin;16:505-530
18. Dumesnil JG, Yoganathan AP. Valve prosthesis hemodynamics and the problem of high transprosthetic pressure gradients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1992;6(suppl.I):I-34-I-38
19. Vandervoort PM, Greenberg NL, Pu M, Powell KA, Cosgrove DM, Thomas JD. Pressure recovery in bileaflet heart valve prostheses: Localized high velocities and gradients in central and side orifices with implications for Doppler-catheter gradient relation in aortic and mitral position. Circulation 1995;92:3464-3472
20. Henneke KH, Pongratz G, Bachmann K. Limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of prosthetic valve hemodynamics. J Heart Valve Dis 1995;4:18-25
21. Kirzner CF, Vinals B, Moya J, Puente JG, Rabago R, Artiz V, Martinelle J, Fraile-Chief J. Hemodynamic performance evaluation of small aortic ATS Medical valves by Doppler echocardiography. J Heart Valve Dis 1997;6:661-665
22. Karpuz H, Jeanrenaud X, Hurni M, et al. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the new ATS medical prosthetic valve in the aortic position. Am J Card Imaging 1996;10:254-260
23. Van Nooten G, Caes F, Francois K, Missault L, Van Belleghem Y. Clinical experience with the first 100 ATS heart valve implants. Cardiovasc Surg 1996;4:288-292
24. Hata M, Shiono M, Orime Y, et al. Mid-term results of ATS open pivot bileaflet mechanical prosthetic heart valve. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;6:34-38
25. Hasegawa M. Clinical evaluation of ATS prosthetic valve by Doppler echocardiography: Comparison with St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;6:247-251
26. Özeren M, Veli Dogan O, Dolpgun A, Koçyldirim E, Karapinar K, Yücel E. Clinical results of the ATS prosthetic valve in 240 implants and review of the literature. J Heart Valve Dis 2001;10:628-635
27. Autschbach R, Walther T, Falk V, Kostelka M, Rösler A, Langebartels G, Krüger M; Diegeler A, Mohr FW. Prospective randomized comparison of different mechanical aortic valves. Circulation 2000;102(suppl.III):III-1-III-4
28. Burstow DJ, Nishimura RA, Bailey KR, Reeder GS, Holmes DR, Jr., Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic measurement of prosthetic valve gradients. A simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study. Circulation 1989;80:504-514