Phylogenetic relationships within Cornus (Cornaceae) based on 26S rDNA sequences

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 88, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 1131-1138

  Fan, Chuanzhu ^a,b   Xiang, Qiu Yun ^a,b  

^a Nucl Eng Idaho State University   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

26S rDNA; Combining data; Cornaceae; Cornus; CpDNA; Molecular evolution; Molecular phylogeny

Indexed keywords

CORNACEAE; CORNUS; CORNUS MAS; CORNUS OBLONGA;

EID: 0038207195     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2657096     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. ASHWORTH, V. E. T. M. 2000. Phylogenetic relationship in Phoradendreae (Viscaceae) inferred from three regions of the nuclear ribosomal cistron. I. Major lineages and paraphyly of Phoradendron. Systematic Botany 25: 349-370.
2. BAIN, J. F., AND K. E. DENFORD. 1979. The herbaceous members of the genus Cornus in NW North America. Botanical Notiser 132: 121-129.
3. BALDWIN, B. G., M. J. SANDERSON, J. M. PORTER. M. F. WOJCIECHOWSKI, C. S. CAMPBELL, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247-277.
4. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
5. BULT, C. J., J. A. SWEERE, AND E. A. ZIMMER. 1995. Cryptic sequence simplicity, nucleotide composition bias, and molecular coevolution in the large subunit of ribosomal DNA in plants: implications for phylogenetic analysis. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 235-246.
6. CLARK, G. B., B. W. TAGUE, V. C. WARE, AND S. A. GERBI. 1984. Xenopus Laevis 28S ribosomal RNA: a secondary structure and its evolutionary and functional implications. Nucleic Acid Researches 12: 6197-6220.
7. DOVER, G. A., AND R. B. FLAVELL. 1984. Molecular coevolution: DNA divergence and the maintenance of function. Cell 38: 622-623.
8. EERNISSE, D. J., AND A. G. KLUGE. 1993. Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules, and morphology. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10: 1170-1195.
9. EYDE, R. H. 1987. The case for keeping Cornus in the broad Linnaean sense. Systematic Botany 12: 505-518.
10. _. 1988. Comprehending Cornus', puzzles and progress in the systematics of dogwoods. Botanical Review 54: 233-351.
11. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
12. FERGUSON, I. K. 1966. Notes on the nomenclature of Cornus. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 47: 100-105.
13. FLAVELL, R. B. 1986. Structure and control of expression of ribosomal RNA genes. Oxford Survey of Plant Molecular Cell Biology 3: 252-274.
14. HARMS, H. 1898. Cornaceae. In A. Engler and K. Prantl [eds.], Die naturalichen Pflanzenfamilien, Teil III, Abteilung 8, 250-270. W. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
15. HARDIN, J. W., AND Z. E. MURRELL. 1997. Foliar micromorphology of Cornus. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 124: 124-139.
16. HASEGAWA, M., H. KISHINO, AND T. YANO. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Molecular Evolution 21: 160-174.
17. HUTCHINSON, J. 1942. Neglected genetic characters in the family Cornaceae. Annals of Botany (London), series 2(6): 83-93.
18. JOHNSON, L. A., AND D. E. SOLTIS. 1998. Assessing congruence: empirical examples from molecular data. In D. E. Soltis, P. E. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle [eds.], Molecular systematics of plants II, 297-347. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
19. KUZOFF, R. K., J. A. SWEERE, D. E. SOLTIS, P. S. SOLTIS, AND E. A. ZIMMER. 1998. The phylogenetic potential of entire 26S rDNA sequences in plant. Molecular Biology Evolution 15: 251-263.
20. LÖVE, A., AND D. LÖVE. 1975. Cytotaxonomic atlas of the Arctic flora. J. Cramer, Vaduz, Germany.
21. MISHLER, B. D., L. A. LEWIS, M. A. BUCHHEIM, K. S. RENZAGLIA, D. J. GARBARY, C. F. DELWIICHE, F. W. ZECHMAN, T. S. KANTZ, AND R. L. CHAPMAN. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships of the "green algae" and "bryophytes." Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 81: 451-483.
22. MORGAN, D. R., AND D. E. SOLTIS. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships among members of Saxifragaceae sensu lato based on rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 631-660.
23. MURRELL, Z. E. 1993. Phylogenetic relationship in Cornus (Cornaceae). Systematic Botany 18: 469-495.
24. _. 1994. Dwarf dogwoods: intermediacy and the morphological landscape. Systematic Botany 19: 539-556.
25. NAKAI, T. 1909. Cornaceae in Japan. Botanical Magazine Tokyo 23: 35-45.
26. POJARKOVA, A. I. 1950. K voprosu o sistematicheskikh otnosheniyakh vnutri linneevskogo roda Cornus L. Bot. Mater. Gerb. Bot. Inst. Komarova Akad. Nauk. SSSR 12: 164-180.
27. RAFINESQUE, C. S. 1838. Alsograph. C. S. Rafinesque, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
28. RO, K., C. S. KEENER, AND B. A. MCPHERON. 1997. Molecular phylogenetic study of the Ranunculaceae: utility of the nuclear 26S ribosomal DNA in inferring intrafamilial relationships. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 8: 117-127.
29. SOLTIS, D. E., AND P. S. SOLTIS. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships among Saxifragaceae sensu lato: a comparison of topologies based in 18S rDNA and rbcL sequences. American Journal of Botany 84: 504-522.
30. _, AND _. 1998. Choosing an approach and an appropriate gene for phylogenetic analysis. In D. E. Soltis, P. E. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle [eds.], Molecular systematics of plants II, 1-42. Chapman and Hall, New York. New York, USA.
31. SPACH, E. 1839. Les Cornaceae. In Histoive naturelle des vegetaux, vol. 8, 86-110. Librarie Encyclopedique de Roret, Paris, France.
32. STEFANOVIC, S., M. JAGER, J. DEUTSCH, J. BROUTIN, AND M. MASSELOT. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of conifers inferred from partial 28S rDNA gene sequences. American Journal of Botany 85: 688-697.
33. SUGIURA, M., Y. IIDA, K. OONO, AND F. TAKAIWA. 1985. The complete nucleotide sequence of a rice 25S rRNA gene. Gene 37: 255-259.
34. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2000. PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 4.0b4. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
35. VON BERCHTOLD, F., AND P. M. OPIZ. 1838. Cornaceae. In Oekonomischtechnische Flora Bohmens, Band 1, Teil 2, 167-180. T. Thabor, Prague, Czechoslovakia.
36. WANGERIN, W. 1910. Cornaceae. In A. Engler [ed.], Das Pflanzenreich, series IV, family 229 (Heft 41). W. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
37. XIANG, Q.-Y. 1987. A neglected character of Cornus L. s. l. with special reference to a new subgenus-Sinocornus Q. Y. Xiang. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 25: 125-131.
38. _, S. J. BRUNSFELD, D. E. SOLTIS, AND P. S. SOLTIS. 1996. Phylogenetic relationship in Cornus based on chloroplast DNA restriction sites: implications for biogeography and character evolution. Systematic Botany 21: 515-534.
39. _, D. E. SOLTIS, D. R. MORGAN, AND P. S. SOLTIS. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships of Cornus L. Sensu Lato and putative relatives inferred from rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 723-734.
40. _, _, AND P. S. SOLTIS. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of Cornaceae and close relatives inferred from matK and rbcL sequences. American Journal of Botany 85: 285-297.