The 8th intrim report: The central role of outcome in guidelines and disease management programs;8. Zwischenbilanz: Die zentrale rolle von outcome in leitlinien und disease management programmen

Zeitschrift fur Arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung

Volumn 97, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 233-238

  Kopp, Ina ^a   Müller, Wolfgang ^b   Lorenz, Wilfried ^b  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLIC HEALTH; SHORT SURVEY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH INSURANCE; STANDARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

DISEASE MANAGEMENT; GERMANY; HUMANS; MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0038206865     PISSN: 14317621     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Short Survey

References (27)

1. Berwick DM (1996) Quality of health care. Part 5: Payment by capitation and the quality of care. New England Journal of Medicine 335: 1227-1231
2. Blumenthal D (1996) Quality of Health Care. Part 1: Quality of Care - What is it? New England Journal of Medicine 335: 891-894
3. Blumenthal D (1996) Quality of health care. Part 4: The origins of the quality-of-care debate. New England Journal of Medicine 335: 1146-1149
4. Brook RH, McGlynn EA, Cleary PD (1996) Quality of health care. Part 2: Measuring quality of care. New England Journal of Medicine 335: 966-969
5. Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G et al. (2001) Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. British Journal of Surgery 88: 1157-1168
6. Chassin MR (1996) Quality of health care. Part 3: Improving the quality of care. New England Journal of Medicine 336: 1060-1063
7. Dey I (1993) Qualitative data analysis. London: Routledge, 1-285
8. Ellwood PM (1988) Shattuck lecture - outcomes management. New England Journal of Medicine 318: 1549-1556
9. Epstein AM (1990) The outcomes movement - will it get us where we want to go? New England Journal of Medicine 323: 266-270
10. Epstein RS, Sherwood LM (1996) From outcomes research to disease management: A guide for the perplexed. Annals of Internal Medicine 124: 832-837
11. Europarat (2001) Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member states on developing a methodology for drawing up guidelines on best medical practices. http: //cm.coe.int/ta/rec/2001/2001r13.htm
12. Geraedts M, Selbmann H-K, Ollenschläger G (2002) Beurteilung der methodischen Qualität klinischer Messgrössen. Zeitschrift für ärztliche Fortbildung und Qualitätssicherung 96: 91-96
13. Gross PA, Greenfield S, Cretin S et al. (2001) Optimal methods for guideline implementation: conclusions from Leeds Castle meeting. Medical Care 39: 85-92
14. a. Herbert P (1997) Treatment. In: Robert L. Kane (ed.) Understanding health care outcomes research. Gaithersburg (Maryland), Aspen publishers, p. 93
15. Koller M, Kussmann J, Lorenz W et al. (1996) Symptom reporting in cancer patients: The role of negative affect and experienced social stigma. Cancer 77: 983-995
16. Koller M, Lorenz W (2002) Quality of life: a deconstruction for clinicians. Journal of the Royal Society Medicine 95: 481-488
17. Koller M, Lorenz W, Wagner K et al. (2000) Expectations and quality of life of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Journal of the Royal Society Medicine 93: 621-628
18. Kopp I, Encke A, Lorenz W (2002) Leitlinien als Instrument der Qualitätssicherung in der Medizin. Bundesgesundheitsbl-GesundheitsforschGesundheitsschutz 45: 223-233
19. Lorenz W (1998) Outcome: Definition and methods of evaluation. In: Troidl H, McKneally MF, Mulder DS, Wechsler AS, McPeek B, Spitzer WO. Surgical research. Basic principles and clinical practice, 3rd ed. New York: Springer, 513-520
20. Lorenz W, Ollenschläger G, Geraedts M et al. (2001) Das Leitlinien-Manual. Entwicklung und Implementierung von Leitlinien in der Medizin. Zeitschrift für ärztliche Fortbildung und Qualitätssicherung 95/Suppl. 1
21. Lorenz W, Troidl H, Solomkin JS et al. (1999) Second step: Testing Outcome measurements. World Journal of Surgery 23: 768-780
22. Nies C, Celik I, Lorenz W et al. (2001) Outcome nach minimal-invasiver Chirurgie. Qualitative Analyse und Bewertung der klinischen Relevanz von Studienendpunkten durch Patient und Arzt. Chirurg 72: 19-29
23. Relman AS (1988) Assessment and accountability. The third revolution in medical care. New England Journal of Medicine 319: 1220-1222
24. Scheibe O (1999) Qualitätssicherung mit Tracerdiagnosen. In: Ekkernkamp A, Scheibe O. Qualitätsmanagement in der Medizin: Handbuch für Klinik und Praxis. Landsberg: ecomed, 1-3
25. Schumacher J, Klaiberg A, Brähler E (2003) Diagnostische Verfahren zu Lebensqualität und Wohlbefinden. Göttingen: Hogrefe Verlag für Psychologie, 1-329
26. Troidl H, Wechsler AS, McKneally MF (1998) How to choose a relevant endpoint. In: Troidl H, McKneally MF, Mulder DS, Wechsler AS, McPeek B, Spitzer WO. Surgical research. Basic principles and clinical practice, 3 ed. New York: Springer, 303-319
27. Wennberg JE, Gittelsohn AM (1973) Small area variations in health care delivery. Science 182: 1102-1108