Outcome of minimally invasive surgery. Qualitative analysis and evaluation of the clinical relevance of outcome variables by patients and physicians;Outcome nach minimal-invasiver Chirurgie: Qualitative Analyse und Bewertung der klinischen Relevanz von Studienendpunkten durch Patient und Arzt

Chirurg

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 19-29

  Nies, C ^a   Celik, I ^a   Lorenz, W ^a   Koller, M ^a   Plaul, U ^a   Krack, W ^a   Sitter, H ^a   Rothmund, M ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cholecystectomy; Clinical relevance; Minimally invasive surgery; Qualitative analysis; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EVALUATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 0347236449     PISSN: 00094722     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001040051262     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aaronson NK, Cull AM, Kaassa S, Sprangers MAG (1996) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) modular approach to quality of life assessment in oncology: an update. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, p 179
2. Atteslander P (2000) Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin New York, S 201
3. Bauhofer A, Lorenz W, Stinner B, Rothmund M, et al (im Druck) Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in the prevention of postoperative infectious complications and a sub-optimal recovery from surgery in patients with colorectal cancer and increased preoperative risk (ASA 3 and 4). Protocol of a controlled clinical trial developed by consensus of an international study group. Part two: design of the study. Inflamm Res
4. Becker H, Neufang T (1997) Appendektomie 1997 - Offen oder geschlossen? Chirurg 68: 17
5. Dey I (1993) Qualitative data analysis. A user-friendly guide for social scientists. Routledge, London, New York
6. Epstein AM (1990) The outcome movement - will it get us where we want to go? N Engl J Med 323:266
7. Eypasch E, Williams I, Wood-Dauphinée SW, Ure BM, et al (1995) Gastrointestinal quality of life index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82: 216
8. Helou A, Lorenz W, Ollenschläger G, Reinauer H, Schwartz FW (2000) Methodische Standards der Entwicklung evidenz-basierter Leitlinien in Deutschland. Konsens zwischen Wissenschaft, Selbstverwaltung und Praxis. Z Ärztl Fortb + QS 94: 330
9. Herbert P (1997) Treatment. In: Kane RL (edn) Understanding health care outcomes research. Aspen, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA 1997, p 93
10. Jenicek M (1999) Clinical case reporting in evidence-based medicine. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford Auckland Boston
11. Jennett B (1986) High technology medicine. Benefits and burdens. Oxford University Press, Oxford
12. Kane RL (1997) Understanding health care outcomes research. Aspen, Gaithersburg, Maryland
13. Koller M, Kussmann J, Lorenz W, Jenkins M, et al (1996) Symptom reporting in cancer patients: the role of negative affect and experienced social stigma. Cancer 77:983
14. Koller M, Heitmann K, Kussmann J, Lorenz W (1999) Symptom reporting in cancer patients II: relations to social desirability, negative affect, and self-reported health behaviours. Cancer 86: 1609
15. Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 140: 44
16. Lorenz W (1998) Outcome: definition and methods of evaluation. In: Troidl H, McKneally MF, Mulder DS, Wechsler AS, et al (eds) Surgical research. Basic principles and clinical practice, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 513
17. Lorenz W, McKneally MF, Troidl H, Banerjee JK, et al (1998) Surgical research around the world. In: Troidl H, McKneally MF, Mulder DS, Wechsler AS, et al (eds) Surgical research. Basic principles and clinical practice, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 637
18. Lorenz W, Troidl H, Solomkin JS, Nies C, et al (1999) Second step: testing - outcome measurements. World J Surg 23: 768
19. Majeed AW, Troy G, Nicholl JP, Smythe A, et al (1996) Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy. Lancet 347: 989
20. Martin DK, McKneally MF (1998) Qualitative research. In: Troidl H, McKneally MF, Mulder DS, Wechsler AS, et al (eds) Surgical research. Basic principles and clinical practice, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 235
21. Moher D, Jadad R, Nichol G, Penman M, et al (1995) Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists. Controll Clin Trials 16: 62
22. Neisser U (1979) Kognition und Wirklichkeit. Prinzipien und Implikationen der kognitiven Psychologie. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart, S 21
23. Neugebauer E, Troidl H, Spangenberger W, Dietrich A, Lefering R (1991) Conventional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg 78: 150
24. Niedermeier HP (1999) Probleme der Generalisierbarkeit von randomisierten Studien am Beispiel der Carotischirurgie. Langenbecks Arch Chir 39 [Suppl II]: 815
25. Philipchalk RP (1995) Invitation to social psychology. Harcourt Brace College Publishers, Fort Worth Philadelphia San Diego New York, p 160
26. Strauss SE, Sackett DL (1999) Applying evidence to the individual patient. Ann Oncol 10: 29
27. Torrance GW, Feeny D (1989) Utilities and quality-adjusted life years. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 5: 559
28. Troidl H, Spangenberger W, Dietrich A, Neugebauer E (1991) Laparoskopische Cholecystektomie - Erste Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse bei 300 Operationen: Eine prospektive Beobachtungsstudie. Chirurg 62: 257
29. Troidl H, Wechsler AS, McKneally MF (1998) How to choose a relevant endpoint. In: Troidl H, McKneally MF, Mulder DS, Wechsler AS, et al (eds) Surgical research. Basic principles and clinical practice. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 303
30. Troidl H, McKneally MF, Mulder DS, Wechsler AS, et al (1998) (Hrsg) Surgical research. Basic principles and clinical practice, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
31. Wulff HR, Pedersen SA, Rosenberg R (1986) Philosophy of Medicine: an introduction. Blackwell, Oxford, p 1
32. Zola IK (1966) Culture and symptoms - an analysis of patients' presenting complaints. Am Sociol Rev 31: 615