Diversification of andromonoecy in Solanum section Lasiocarpa (Solanaceae): The roles of phenotypic plasticity and architecture

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 90, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 707-715

  Miller, Jill S ^a,b   Diggle, Pamela K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b AMHERST COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Andromonoecy; Architecture; Development; Phenotypic plasticity; Sexual systems; Solanaceae; Solanum

Indexed keywords

ANDROMONOECY; FLORAL TRAIT; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PLANT ARCHITECTURE; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA; SOLANACEAE; SOLANUM; SOLANUM CANDIDUM; SOLANUM FEROX; SOLANUM PSEUDOLULO; SOLANUM QUITOENSE;

EID: 0038175388     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.90.5.707     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. ANDERSON, G. J., AND D. E. SYMON. 1989. Functional dioecy and andromonoecy in Solanum. Evolution 43: 204-219.
2. BERNARDELLO, L. M., C. B. HEISER, AND M. PIAZZANO. 1994. Karyotypic studies in Solanum section Lasiocarpa (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 81: 95-103.
3. BERTIN. R. I. 1982a. The evolution and maintenance of andromonoecy. Evolutionary Theory 6: 25-32.
4. BERTIN, R. I. 1982b. The ecology of sex expression in red buckeye. Ecology 63: 445-456.
5. BERTIN, R. I. 1995. Competition for assimilates and fruit position affect fruit set in indeterminate greenhouse tomato. Annals of Botany 75: 55-65.
6. BRUNEAU, A., E. E. DICKSON, AND S. KNAPP. 1995. Congruence of chloroplast DNA restriction site characters with morphological and isozyme data in Solanum sect. Lasiocarpa. Canadian Journal of Botany 73: 1151-1167.
7. CHILD, A. 1979. A review of branching patterns in the Solanaceae. In J. G. Hawkes, R. N. Lester, and A. D. Skelding [eds.], The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae, 345-356. Academic Press, London, UK.
8. CHILD, A., AND R. N. LESTER. 1991. Life form and branching within the Solanaceae. In J. G. Hawkes, R. N. Lester, M. Nee, and N. Estrada [eds.], Solanaceae III: taxonomy, chemistry, evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew and Linnean Society, London, UK.
9. COLEMAN, J. R., AND M. A. COLEMAN. 1982. Reproductive biology of an andromonoecious Solanum (S. paliacanthum Dun.). Biotropica 14: 69-75.
10. DARWIN, C. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. Murray, London, UK.
11. DIGGLE, P. K. 1991. Labile sex expression in andromonoecious Solanum hirtum: pattern of variation in floral structure. Canadian Journal of Botany 69: 2033-2043.
12. DIGGLE, P. K. 1993. Developmental plasticity, genetic variation, and the evolution of andromonoecy in Solanum hirtum (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 967-973.
13. DIGGLE, P. K. 1994. The expression of andromonoecy in Solanum hirtum (Solanaceae): phenotypic plasticity and ontogenetic contingency. American Journal of Botany 81: 1354-1365.
14. DIGGLE, P. K. 1995. Architectural effects and the interpretation of patterns of fruit and seed development. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26: 531-552.
15. DIGGLE, P. K. 2002. Architectural effects on floral form and function: a review. In T. Stuessy, E. Hörandl, and V. Mayer [eds.], Deep morphology: toward a renaissance of morphology in plant systematics. Koeltz. Königstein, Germany.
16. DULBERGER, R., A. LEVY, AND D. PALEVITCH. 1981. Andromonoecy in Solanum marginatum. Botanical Gazette 142: 259-261.
17. EMMS, S. K. 1996. Temporal patterns of seed set and decelerating fitness returns on female allocation in Zigadenus paniculatus (Liliaceae), an andromonoecious lily. American Journal of Botany 83: 304-315.
18. EMMS, S. K., D. A. STRATTON, AND A. A. SNOW. 1997. The effect of inflorescence size on male fitness: experimental tests in the andromonoecious lily, Zigadenus paniculatus. Evolution 51: 1481-1489.
19. GREGG, K. B. 1975. The effect of light intensity on sex expression in species of Cyanoches and Catasetum (Orchidaceae). Selbyana 1: 101-113.
20. GREGG, K. B. 1978. The interaction of light intensity, plant size, and nutrition on sex expression in Cyanoches (Orchidaceae). Selbyana 2: 212-223.
21. HALLÉ, F., R. A. A. OLDEMAN, AND P. B. TOMLINSON. 1978. Tropical trees and forests. An architectural analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
22. HEISER, C. B. 1972. The relationship of the naranjilla, Solanum quitoense. Biotropica 4: 77-84.
23. HEISER, C. B. 1987. Origins of Solanum lasiocarpum and S. repandum. American Journal of Botany 74: 1045-1048.
24. HOSSAIN, M. 1973. Observations on stylar heteromorphism in Solanum torvum Sw. (Solanaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 66: 291-301.
25. LITTELL, R. C., R. J. FREUND, AND P. C. SPECTOR. 1991. SAS© system for linear models. 3rd edition. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina. USA.
26. LITTELL, R. C., G. A. MILLIKEN, W. W. STROUP, AND R. D. WOLFINGER. 1996. SAS© system for mixed models, 3rd ed. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
27. LLOYD, D. G. 1980. Sexual strategies in plants I. An hypothesis of serial adjustment of maternal investment during one reproductive session. New Phytologist 86: 69-79.
28. PODOLSKY, R. D. 1993. Evolution of a flower dimorphism: how effective is pollen dispersal by &male& flowers? Ecology 74: 2255-2260.
29. SOLOMON, B. P. 1985. Environmentally influenced changes in sex expression in an andromonoecious plant. Ecology 66: 1321-1332.
30. SPALIK, K. 1991. On the evolution of andromonoecy and 'overproduction' of flowers: a resource allocation model. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42: 325-336.
31. SYMON, D. E. 1979. Sex forms in Solanum (Solanaceae) and the role of pollen collecting insects. In J. G. Hawkes, R. N. Lester, and A. D. Skelding [eds.], The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae, 385-397. Academic Press, London, UK.
32. WHALEN, M. D., AND E. E. CARUSO. 1983. Phylogeny in Solanum sect. Lasiocarpa (Solanaceae): congruence of morphological and molecular data. Systematic Botany 8: 369-380.
33. WHALEN, M. D., AND D. E. COSTICH. 1986. Andromonoecy in Solanum. In W. G. D'Arcy [ed.], Solanaceae: biology and systematics, 284-302. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
34. WHALEN, M. D., D. E. COSTICH, AND C. B. HEISER. 1981. Taxonomy of Solanum section Lasiocarpa. Gentes Herbarium 12: 41-129.
35. YAMPOLSKY, C., AND H. YAMPOLSKY. 1922. Distribution of sex forms in the phanerogamic flora. Bibliotheca Genetica 3: 1-62.
36. ZIMMERMAN, J. K. 1991. Ecological correlates of labile sex expression in the orchid Catasetum viridiflavum. Ecology 72: 597-608.