Reassessing aptitude: Introduction to a special issue in honor of Richard E. Snow

Educational Psychologist

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 79-83

  Kyllonen, Patrick C ^a   Lajoie, Susanne P ^b  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038119698     PISSN: 00461520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15326985EP3802_2     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Ackerman, P. L. (2003). Aptitude complexes and trait complexes. Educational Psychologist, 38, 85-93.
2. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-anatytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Corno, L., Cronbach, L. J., Kupermintz, H., Lohman, D. F., Mandinach, E., Porteus, A. W., et al. (2002). Remaking the concept of aptitude: Extending the legacy of Richard E. Snow. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30, 116-127.
5. Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. Oxford, England: Irvington.
6. Gustafsson, J.-E. (1987). Hierarchical models of individual differences in cognitive abilities. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 35-71). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Lajoie, S. P. (2003). Individual differences in spatial ability: Developing technologies to increase strategy awareness and skills. Educational Psychologist, 38, 115-125.
8. Shute, V., & Towle, B. (2003). Adaptive e-learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 105-114.
9. Snow, R. E. (1977). Individual differences and institutional theory. Educational Researcher, 6, 11-15.
10. Snow, R. E., & Lohman, D. F. (1984). Toward a theory of cognitive aptitude for learning from instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 347-376.
11. Woltz, D. J. (2003). Implicit cognitive processes as aptitudes for learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 95-104.