Prediction of forest soil nutrient status using vegetation

Journal of Vegetation Science

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 55-62

  Gégout, Jean Claude ^a   Hervé, Jean Christophe ^a   Houllier, François ^b   Pierrat, Jean Claude ^a  

^a LERFoB   (France)

^b UMR AMAP   (France)

Author keywords

Aluminium; Calcium; Environmental calibration; Indicator value; Kernel method; Logistic regression; Species response curve

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; FLORISTICS; FOREST SOIL; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; SOIL NUTRIENT; SPECIES OCCURRENCE;

FRANCE; VOSGES MOUNTAINS;

EID: 0038059240     PISSN: 11009233     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02127.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Andersson, M. 1988. Toxicity and tolerance of aluminium in vascular plants. Water Air Soil Pollut. 39: 439-462.
2. Anon. 1999. S-PLUS 2000. Guide to statistics. Data analysis Products Division, MathSoft Inc, Seattle, WA.
3. Arp, P.A. & Krause, H.H. 1984. The forest floor: lateral variability as revealed by systematic sampling. Can. J. Soil Sci. 64: 423-437.
4. Bio, A.M.F., Alkemade, R. & Barendregt, A. 1998. Determining alternative models for vegetation response analysis: a non parametric approach. J. Veg. Sci. 9: 5-16.
5. Bonneau, M. & Nys, C. 1997. Effets des amendements calcimagnésiques en forêt. C.R. Acad. Agric. Fr. 83: 161-169.
6. Brunet, J., von Oheimb, G. & Diekmann, M. 2000. Factors influencing vegetation gradients across ancient-recent woodland borderlines in southern Sweden. J. Veg. Sci. 11: 515-524.
7. Cronan, C.S. & Grigal, D.F. 1995. Use of calcium/aluminium ratios as indicators of stress in forest ecosystems. J. Environ. Qual. 24: 209-226.
8. de Tillesse, M. & Devillez, F. 1995. Modélisation du niveau trophique des sols forestiers: évaluation du pH en fonction des groupements phytosociologiques. Ann. Sci. For. 52: 353-364.
9. Diekmann, M. & Dupré, C. 1997. Acidification and eutrophication of deciduous forests in northwestern Germany demonstrated by indicator species analysis. J. Veg. Sci. 8: 855-864.
10. Ellenberg, H. 1996. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen. Ulmer, Stuttgart, DE.
11. Ellenberg, H., Weber, H.E., Drill, R., Wirth, V., Werner, W. & Paulißen, D. 1992. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobot. 18: 1-248.
12. Ersten, A.C.D., Alkemade, J.R.M. & Wassen, M.J. 1998. Calibrating Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, acidity, nutrient availability and salinity in the Netherlands. Plant Ecol. 135: 113-124.
13. Gégout, J.C. 1992. Typologie des stations forestières de la Plaine de la Lanterne (Dépression périvosgienne). E.N.G.R.E.F. centre de Nancy. Maison de l'environnement des Vosges du sud, Nancy, FR.
14. Gégout, J.C. 1995. Etude des relations entre les ressources minérales du sol et la végétation forestière dans les Vosges. Thèse de l'Université de Nancy I, Nancy, FR.
15. Gégout, J.C. & Pierrat, J.C. 1998. L'autécologie des espèces végétales: une approche par régression non paramétrique. Ecologie 29: 473-482.
16. Goovaerts, P., Gerard, G. & Frankart, R. 1989. Etude de la variabilité spatiale de quelques pmpriétés chimiques du sol en Fagne de Chimay, Belgique. Pédologie 39: 191-207.
17. Guiot, J., Pons, A., De Beaulieu, J.L. & Reille, M. 1989. A 140,000-year continental climate reconstruction from two European pollen records. Nature 338: 309-313.
18. Hawkes, J.C., Pyatt, D.G. & White, M.S. 1997. Using Ellenberg indicator values to assess soil quality in British forests from ground vegetation: a pilot study. J. Appl. Ecol. 34: 375-387.
19. Hill, M.O. & Carey, P.D. 1997. Prediction in the Rothamsted Park Grass Experiment by Ellenberg indicator values. J. Veg. Sci. 8: 579-586.
20. Hill, M.O., Roy, D.B., Mountford, J.O. & Bunce, R.G.H. 2000. Extending Ellenberg's indicator values to a new area: an algorithmic approach. J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 3-15.
21. Huisman, J., Olff, H. & Fresco, L.F.M. 1993. A hierarchical set of models for species response analysis. J. Veg. Sci. 4: 37-46.
22. Lameire, S., Hermy, M. & Honnay, O. 2000. Two decades of change in the ground vegetation of a mixed deciduous forest in an agricultural landscape. J. Veg, Sci. 11: 695-704.
23. Landolt, E. 1977. Ökologische Zeigerwerte zur Schweizer Flora. Veröff. Geobot. Inst. Eidg. Tech. Hochsch. Stift. Rübel Zür. 64: 1-208.
24. Lundell, Y. 1987. Nutrient variation in forest soil samples due to time of sampling and method of storage. Plant Soil 98: 363-375.
25. Odland, A., Birks, H.J.B. & Line, J.M. 1995. Ecological optima and tolerances of Thelypteris limbosperma, Athyrium distentifolium, and Matteuccia struthiopteris along environmental gradients in Western Norway. Vegetatio 120: 115-129.
26. Oksanen, J., Läärä, E., Huttunen P. & Meriläinen, J. 1990. Maximum likelihood prediction of lake acidity based on sedimented diatoms. J. Veg. Sci. 1: 49-56.
27. Persson, S. 1981. Ecological indicator values as an aid in the interpretation of ordination diagrams. J. Ecol. 69: 71-84.
28. Schaffers, A.P. & Sýkora, K.V. 2000. Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction: a comparison with field measurements. J. Veg. Sci. 11: 225-244.
29. Schoenholtz, S. H., Van Miegroet, H. & Burger, J.A. 2000. A review of chemical and physical properties as indicators of forest soil quality: challenges and opportunities. For. Ecol. Manage. 138: 335-356.
30. Schreuder, H.T. & Thomas, C.E. 1991. Establishing cause-effect relationships using forest survey data. For. Sci. 37: 1497-1512.
31. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1985. Correspondence analysis of incidence and abundance data: Properties in terms of a unimodal response model. Biometrics 41: 859-873.
32. ter Braak, C.J.F. & Barendregt, L.G. 1986. Weighted averaging of species indicator values: its efficiency in environmental calibration. Math. Biosci. 78: 57-72.
33. ter Braak, C.J.F. & Looman, C.W.N. 1986. Weighted averaging, logistic regression and the Gaussian response model. Vegetatio 65: 3-11.
34. ter Braak, C.J.F. & van Dam, H. 1989. Inferring pH from diatoms: a comparison of old and new calibration methods. Hydrobiologia 178: 209-223.
35. Thimonier, A., Dupouey, J.L., Bost, F. & Becker, M. 1994. Simultaneous eutrophication and acidification of a forest ecosystem in North-East France. New Phytol. 126: 533-539.
36. Tutin, T.G. et al. 1966-1976. Flora Europaea. 5 vols. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
37. Wand, M.P. & Jones, M.C. 1995. Kernel smoothing. Monographs on statistics and applied probability. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
38. Warfvinge, P. & Sverdrup, H. 1995. Critical loads of acidity to Swedish forests soils. Rep. Ecol. Environ. Eng. 5: 0-104.
39. Wierda, A., Fresco, L.F.M., Grootjans, A.P. & van Diggelen, R. 1997. Numerical assessment of plant species as indicators of groundwater regime. J. Veg. Sci. 8: 707-716.
40. Wilson, S.M., Pyatt, D.G., Malcolm, D.C. & Connolly, T. 2001. The use of ground vegetation and humus type as indicators of soil nutrient regime for an ecological site classification of British forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 140: 101-116.
41. Worton, B.J. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilisation distribution in Home Range Studies. Ecology 70: 164-168.
42. Yee, T.W. & Mitchell, N.D. 1991. Generalized additive models in plant ecology. J. Veg. Sci. 2: 587-602.