Tumor growth reduction and DNA transfer by cavitation-enhanced high-intensity focused ultrasound in vivo

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 887-893

  Miller, Douglas L ^a   Song, Jianming ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer; Cancer gene therapy; Contrast agent; HIFU; Therapy; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

DNA; GENES; IMAGE PROCESSING; PATIENT TREATMENT; TUMORS;

TRANSFECTED CELLS;

ULTRASONICS;

BETA GALACTOSIDASE; ECHO CONTRAST MEDIUM; FS 069; LUCIFERASE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CANCER GRAFT; CANCER REGRESSION; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DNA TRANSFER; FEMALE; GENE TRANSFER; GENETIC TRANSFECTION; HINDLIMB; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN; NONHUMAN; PLASMID; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SHOCK WAVE; TUMOR GROWTH; TUMOR VOLUME; ULTRASOUND THERAPY; VENOUS CIRCULATION;

EID: 0038048071     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-5629(03)00031-0     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Anwer K., Kao G., Proctor B., et al. Ultrasound enhancement of cationic lipid-mediated gene transfer to primary tumors following systemic administration. Gene Ther. 7:2000;1833-1839.
2. Bao S., Thrall B.D., Gies R.A., Miller D.L. In vivo transfection of melanoma cells by lithotripter shock waves. Cancer Res. 58:1998;219-221.
3. Chaussy C., Thuroff S. Results and side effects of high-intensity focused ultrasound in localized prostate cancer. J Endourol. 15:2001;437-440.
4. Coleman A.J., Saunders J.E. A review of the physical properties and biological effects of the high amplitude acoustic field used in extracorporeal lithotripsy. Ultrasonics. 31:1993;75-89.
5. Coleman A.J., Kodama T., Choi M.J., Adams T., Saunders J.E. The cavitation threshold of human tissue exposed to 0.2-MHz pulsed ultrasound Preliminary measurements based on a study of clinical lithotripsy . Ultrasound Med Biol. 21:1995;405-417.
6. Damianou C., Hynynen K. The effect of various physical parameters on the size and shape of necrosed tissue volume during ultrasound surgery. J Acoust Soc Am. 95:1994;1641-1649.
7. Delius M. Medical applications and bioeffects of extracorporeal shock waves. Shock Waves. 4:1994;55-72.
8. Endoh M., Koibuchi N., Sato M., et al. Fetal gene transfer by intrauterine injection with microbubble-enhanced ultrasound. Mol Ther. 5:2002;501-508.
9. Frizzell L.A. Threshold dosages for damage to mammalian liver by high intensity focused ultrasound. IEEE Trans Ultranson Ferroelec Freq Control. 35:1988;578-581.
10. Huber P.E., Pfisterer P. In vitro and in vivo transfection of plasmid DNA in the Dunning prostate tumor Rss27-AT1 is enhanced by focused ultrasound. Gene Ther. 7:2000;1516-1525.
11. Huber P.E., Jenne J., Debus J., Wannenmacher M.F., Pfisterer P. A comparison of shock wave and sinusoidal-focused ultrasound-induced localized transfection of HeLa cells. Ultrasound Med Biol. 25:1999;1451-1457.
12. Lawrie A., Briskin A.F., Francis S.E., et al. Microbubble-enhanced ultrasound for vascular gene delivery. Gene Ther. 7:2000;2023-2027.
13. Miller D.L., Song J. Lithotripter shockwaves with cavitation nucleation agents produce tumor growth reduction and gene transfer in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol. 28:2002;1343-1348.
14. Miller D.L., Bao S., Gies R.A., Thrall B.D. Ultrasonic enhancement of gene transfection in murine melanoma tumors. Ultrasound Med Biol. 25:1999;1425-1430.
15. Miller D.L., Kripfgans O.D., Fowlkes J.B., Carson P.L. Cavitation nucleation agents for nonthermal ultrasound therapy. J Acoust Soc Am. 107:2000;3480-3486.
16. Oosterhof GON, Cornel EB, Smits GAHJ, Debruyne FMJ, Schalken JA. The influence of high-energy shock waves on the development of metastases. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996;22:339-334.
17. Porter T.R., Xie F. Therapeutic ultrasound for gene delivery. Echocardiography. 18:2001;349-353.
18. Prat F., Chapelon J.Y., El Fadil F.A., et al. In vivo effects of cavitation alone or in combination with chemotherapy in a peritoneal carcinomatosis in the rat. Br J Cancer. 68:1993;13-17.
19. Shohet R.V., Chen S., Zhou Y., et al. Echocardiographic destruction of albumin microbubbles directs gene delivery to the myocardium. Circulation. 101:2000;2554-2556.
20. Song J., Tata D., Li L., et al. Combined shockwave and immunogene therapy of mouse melanoma and renal carcinoma tumors. Ultrasound Med Biol. 28:2002;957-964.
21. ter Haar G.R. High intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of tumors. Echocardiography. 18:2001;317-322.
22. ter Haar G., Rivens I., Chen L., Riddler S. High intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of rat tumours. Phys Med Biol. 36:1991;1495-1501.
23. Tran B.C., Hall T.L., Fowlkes J.B., Cain C.A. Non-invasive ultrasound surgery: Role of microbubble enhanced cavitation. 2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. 2000;1425-1428 Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, New York.
24. Vannan M., McCreery T., Li P., et al. Ultrasound-mediated transfection of canine myocardium by intravenous administration of cationic microbubble-linked plasmid DNA. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 15:2002;214-218.
25. Williams A.R., Delius M., Miller D.L., Schwarze W. Investigation of cavitation in flowing media by lithotripter shock waves, both in vitro and in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol. 15:1989;53-60.
26. Wu F., Chen W.Z., Bai J., et al. Pathological changes in human malignant carcinoma treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 27:2001;1099-1106.