Principal components analysis as an evaluation and classification tool for lower torso sEMG data

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1225-1229

  Perez, Miguel A ^a   Nussbaum, Maury A ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Data mining; Data outliers; EMG; Low back; Principal components analysis

Indexed keywords

DATA STRUCTURES; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MUSCLE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

DATA EXPLORATION TOOLS;

BIOMECHANICS;

ARTICLE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0038047157     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00090-3     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Borzelli G., Cappozzo A., Papa E. Inter- and intra-individual variability of ground reaction forces during sit-to-stand with principal component analysis. Medical Engineering and Physics. 21(4):1999;235-240.
2. Deluzio K.J., Wyss U.P., Zee B., Costigan P.A., Sorbie C. Principal component models of knee kinematics and kinetics. normal vs. pathological gait patterns Human Movement Science. 16:1997;201-217.
3. Granata K.P., Orishimo K.F. Response of trunk muscle coactivation to changes in spinal stability. Journal of Biomechanics. 34(9):2001;1117-1123.
4. Hughes R.E., Chaffin D.B. Using principal-components regression to stabilize EMG-muscle force parameter estimates of torso muscles. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 44(7):1997;639-642.
5. Johnson D.E. Applied Multivariate Methods for Data Analysts. 1998;Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA.
6. Khalaf K.A., Parnianpour M., Sparto P.J., Barin K. Feature extraction and quantification of the variability of dynamic performance profiles due to the different sagittal lift characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering. 7(3):1999;278-288.
7. Khalaf K.A., Parnianpour M., Wade L. Feature extraction and modeling of the variability of performance in terms of biomechanical motion patterns during MMH tasks. Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation. 33:1997;35-40.
8. Lariviere C., Gagnon D., Loisel P. An application of pattern recognition for the comparison of trunk muscles EMG waveforms between subjects with and without chronic low back pain during flexion-extension and lateral bending tasks. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 10(4):2000;261-273.
9. Lee Y.H., Kuo C. Factor structure of trunk performance data for healthy subjects. Clinical Biomechanics. 15(4):2000;221-227.
10. Nussbaum M.A., Chaffin D.B. Pattern classification reveals intersubject group differences in lumbar muscle recruitment during static loading. Clinical Biomechanics. 12(2):1997;97-106.
11. Perez M.A., Nussbaum M.A. Lower torso muscle activation patterns for high-magnitude static exertions. gender differences and the effects of twisting Spine. 27(12):2002;1326-1335.
12. Weijs W.A., Sugimura T., Ruijven L.J.v. Motor coordination in a multi-muscle system as revealed by principal components analysis of electromyographic variation. Experimental Brain Research. 127(3):1999;233-243.
13. Wootten M.E., Kadaba M.P., Cochran G.V. Dynamic electromyography. I. Numerical representation using principal component analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 8(2):1990;247-258.
14. Yamamoto S., Suto Y., Kawamura H., Hashizume T., Kakurai S., Sugahara S. Quantitative gait evaluation of hip diseases using principal component analysis. Journal of Biomechanics. 16(9):1983;717-726.