Pattern classification reveals intersubject group differences in lumbar muscle recruitment during static loading

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 97-106

  Nussbaum, Maury A ^a   Chaffin, D B ^b  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Individual differences; Muscle recruitment; Neural network; Pattern classification

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; NEURAL NETWORKS; OPTIMIZATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

LUMBAR MUSCLE RECRUITMENT; STATIC MOMENT LOADING;

MUSCLE;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE FORCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKELETAL MUSCLE; STANDING; TRUNK; VARIANCE; WEIGHT LIFTING;

EID: 0031105765     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0268-0033(96)00056-3     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. 1. Hatze, H. Neuromuscular control systems modeling -A critical survey of recent developments. IEEE Trans Auto Control, 1980, AC-25, 375-385.
2. 2. Lavender, S. A., Tsuang, Y. H. and Andersson, G. B. J. et al. Trunk muscle cocontraction: The effects of moment direction and moment magnitude. J Orthop Res, 1992, 10, 691-700.
3. 3. Lavender, S. A., Tsuang, Y. and Hafezi, A. et al. Coactivation of the trunk muscles during asymmetric loading of the torso. Human Factors, 1992, 34, 239-247.
4. 4. Rumelhart, D. E. and Zipser, D. Feature discovery by competitive learning. Cogn Sci, 1985, 9 75-112.
5. 5. Hughes, R. E, Chaffin, D. B., Lavender, S. A. and Andersson, G. B. J. Evaluating muscle force prediction models of the lumbar trunk using surface electromyography. J Orthop Res, 1994, 12, 689-698.
6. 6. Nussbaum, M. A., Lavender, S. A. and Hughes, R. E. et al. Predicting torso muscle activity during asymmetric loading: a comparison of three optimization models. Proceedings of the American Society of Biomechanics, Tempe, AZ, 1991, 206-207.
7. 7. Walpole, R. E. and Myers, R. H. Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists, 5th edn., Macmillan, New York, 1993.
8. 8. Hof, A. L., Pronk, C. N. A. and van Best, J. A. Comparison between EMG to force processing and kinetic analysis for the calf muscle moment in walking and stepping. J Biomech, 1987, 20, 167-178.
9. 9. Mouton, L. J., Hof, A. L., de Jongh, H. J. and Eisma, W. H. Influence of posture on the relation between surface electromyogram amplitude and back muscle moment: consequences for the use of surface electromyogram to measure back load. Clin Biomech, 1991, 6, 245-251.
10. 10. Olney, S. J. and Winter, D. A. Predictions of knee and ankle moments of force in walking from EMG and kinematic data. J Biomech, 1985, 18, 9-20.
11. 11. Perry, J. and Bekey, G. A. EMG-force relationships in skeletal muscle. CRC Crit Rev Biomed Eng, 1981, 7, 1-22.
12. 12. Bounds, D. G., Lloyd, P.J. and Mathew, B. G. A comparison of neural networks and other pattern recognition approaches to the diagnosis of low back disorders. Neural Networks, 1990, 3, 583-591.
13. 13. Gorman, R. P. and Sejnowski, T. J. Analysis of hidden units in a layered network trained to classify sonar targets. Neural Networks, 1988, 1, 75-89.
14. 14. Weiss, S. M. and Kapouleas, I. An empirical comparison of pattern recognition, neural nets, and machine learning classification methods. Proc Int Joint Conf Artificial Intelligence, 1989, 781-787.
15. 15. Ladin, Z., Murthy, K. R. and De Luca, C. J. Mechanical recruitment of low-back muscles: Theoretical predictions and experimental validation. Spine, 1989, 14, 927-938.
16. 16. Pedersen, D. R., Brand, R. A., Cheng, C. and Arora, J. S. Direct comparison of muscle force predictions using linear and nonlinear programming. J Biomech Eng, 1987, 109, 192-199.
17. 17. Schultz, A. B., Andersson, G. B. J. and Haderspeck, K. et al. Analysis and measurement of lumbar trunk loads in tasks involving bends and twists. J Biomech, 1982, 15, 669-675.
18. 18. Zetterberg, C., Andersson, G. B. J. and Schultz, A. B. The activity of individual trunk muscles during heavy physical loading. Spine, 1987, 12, 1035-1040.
19. 5 dynamic moment into disc, ligamentous, and muscular components during lifting. Spine, 1986, 11, 666-678.
20. 20. McGill, S. M. and Norman, R. W. Potential of lumbodorsal fascia forces to generate back extension moments during squat lifts. J Biomed Eng, 1988, 10, 312-318.
21. 21. Chaffin, D. B. and Andersson, G. B. J. Occupational Biomechanics, 2nd edn, Wiley, New York, 1991, 215-238.
22. 22. Marras, W. S., Lavender, S. A. and Leurgans, S. E. et al. The role of dynamic three-dimensional trunk motion in occupationally-related low back disorders. The effects of workplace factors, trunk position, and trunk motion characteristics on risk of injury. Spine, 1993, 18, 617-628.
23. 23. Sommerich, C. M. and Marras, W. S. Temporal patterns of trunk muscle activity throughout a dynamic, asymmetric lifting motion. Human Factors, 1992, 34, 215-230.