The invisible library: Paradox of the global information infrastructure

Library Trends

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 652-674+687

  Borgman, Christine L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038043957     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Babbie, E. (2001). The practice of social research (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2. Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, L., & MCCahill, M. (1998, August). RFC 2396 Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax. Available at http://www.rfc-editor.org/.
3. Berners-Lee, T., Masinter, L., & MCCahill, M. (1994, December). RFC 1738: Uniform Resource Locators (URL). (See also RFC1808, RFC2368, and RFC2396 at http://www.rfc-editor.org/).
4. Borgman, C. L. (1999). What are digital libraries? Competing visions. In G. Marchionini & E. Fox (Eds.), [Special issue] Progress toward digital libraries. Information Processing & Management, 35(3), 227-243.
5. Borgman, C. L. (2000). From Gutenberg to the global information infrastructure: Access to information in the networked world. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
6. Borgman, C. L. (2002). Final report to the National Science Foundation. Fourth DELOS Workshop. Evaluation of Digital Libraries: Testbeds, Measurements, and Metrics. Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Computer and Automation Research Institute (MTA SZTAKI), Budapest, Hungary, 6-7 June 2002. Grant IIS-0225626. Retrieved on March 20, 2003, from http://www.dli2.nsf.gov/internationalprojects/working_group_reports/evaluation.h tml.
7. Borgman, C. L., Bates, M. J., Cloonan, M. V., Efthimiadis, E. N., Gilliland-Swetland, A., Kafai, Y., Leazer, G. L., & Maddox, A. (1996). Social Aspects Of Digital Libraries. Final Report to the National Science Foundation; Computer, Information Science, and Engineering Directorate; Division of Information, Robotics, and Intelligent Systems; Information Technology and Organizations Program. Award number 95-28808. Retrieved on March 20, 2003, from http://is.gseis.ucla.edu/research/dl/index.html.
8. Borgman, C. L., Gilliland-Swetland, A. J., Leazer, G. L., Mayer, R., Gwynn, D., Gazan, R., & Mautone, P. (2000). Evaluating digital libraries for teaching and learning in undergraduate education: A case study of the Alexandria Digital Earth Prototype (ADEPT). Library Trends, 49(2), 228-250.
9. Buckland, M. K. (1992). Redesigning library services: A manifesto. Chicago: American Library Association.
10. Caidi, N. (2001). The information infrastructure as a discursive space: A case study of the library community in Central and Eastern Europe. Ph.D. Dissertation, Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, 2001. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 3609.
11. Europe and the global information society: Recommendations to the European Council. (1994). Brussels: European Council. (Known as "The Bangemann Report.")
12. Fuller, S. (2002). Knowledge management foundations, Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
13. Furner, J. (2002). On recommending. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(9), 747-763.
14. Gilliland-Swetland, A. J. (2000). Enduring paradigms, new opportunities: The value of the archival perspective in the digital environment. Washington, D.C.: Council on Library and Information Resources.
15. G-7 (Group of Seven) Ministerial Conference on the Information Society. (1995). Chair's conclusions. Retrieved on March 20, 2003, from http://web.archive.org/web/20000411003002/www.ispo.cec.be/g7/keydocs/G7en.html.
16. Lagoze, C., & Van de Sompel, H. (2001). The Open Archives Initiative: Building a low-barrier interoperability framework. In E.A Fox & C.L. Borgman (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, June 20-24, 2001, Roanoke, VA (pp. 54-62). New York: ACM Press.
17. Leazer, G. H. (1994). A conceptual schema for the control of bibliographic works. In D, L. Andersen, T. J. Galvin, & M. D. Giguere (Eds.), Navigating the networks: Proceedings of the ASIS Mid-Year Meeting, Portland, Oregon, May 21-25, 1994 (pp. 115-135). Medford, NJ: Learned Information.
18. Liddy, E. D., Gay, G., Harwell, S., & Finneran, T. (2002) A modest (metadata) proposal. Panel presentation, "How important is metadata?". In G. Marchionini & W. Hersh (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, p 369. July 14-18, 2002, Portland, OR. New York: ACM.
19. Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
20. Lynch, C. A. (1999). Today and tomorrow: What the digital library really means for collections and services; Virtually yours: Models for managing electronic resources and services. In P. Johnson & B. MacEwan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Reference and User Services Association and Association for Library Collections and Technical Services institute, Chicago, Illinois, October 23-25, 1997 (pp. 85-97). Chicago, IL: American Library Association, 1999.
21. Lynch, C. A. (2001). Metadata harvesting and the Open Archives Initiative. ARL Bimonthly Report, 217, 1-9.
22. Marcum, D. (2003). Research questions for the digital era library. Library Trends 51(4).
23. National information infrastructure: Agenda for action. (1993). Retrieved on March 20, 2003, from http://real.utk.edu/FINS/Information_Infrastructure/Fins-II-09.txl.
24. National Research Council; Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications; Computer Science and Telecommunications Board; Committee on Intellectual Property Rights and the Emerging Information Infrastructure. (2000). The digital dilemma: Intellectual property in the information age. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
25. National Research Council; Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications; Computer Science and Telecommunications Board; NRENAISSANCE Committee (1994). Realizing the information future: The Internet and beyond. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
26. Paisley, W. J. (1980). Information and work. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in the communication sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 114-165). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
27. Rayward, W. B. (1993). Electronic information and the functional integration of libraries, museums, and archives. In S. Ross & E. Higgs (Eds.), Electronic information resources and historians: European perspectives (pp. 227-243). St. Katharinen: Scripta Mercaturae Verlag.
28. Smith, A. (1999). Why digitize? Washington, D.C.: Council on Library and Information Resources.
29. Solomon, P. (2002). Discovering information in context. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36 (pp. 229-264). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
30. Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111-134.
31. Svenonius, E. (2000). The intellectual foundation of information organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Tillett, B. B. (1991). A taxonomy of bibliographic relationships. Library Resources & Technical Services, 35, 150-159.
33. Tillett, B. B. (1992). Bibliographic relationships: An empirical study of the LC machine-readable records. Library Resources & Technical Services, 36, 162-188.
34. Tyckoson, D. A. (1989). The 98% solution: The failure of the catalog and the role of electronic databases. Technicalities, 9(2), 8-12.
35. Van de Sompel, H., & Beit-Arie, O. (2001). Open linking in the scholarly information environment using the OpenURL framework. D-Lib Magazine, 7(3). Retrieved on March 20, 2003, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march01/vandesompel/03vandesompel.html.
36. Yakel, E. (2001). Digital preservation. In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology, vol. 35 (pp. 337-378). Medford, NJ: Information Today.