Prevalence effect in a laboratory environment

Radiology

Volumn 228, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 10-14

  Gur, David ^a   Rockette, Howard E ^a   Armfield, Derek R ^a   Blachar, Arye ^a   Bogan, Jennifer K ^a   Brancatelli, Giuseppe ^a   Britton, Cynthia A ^a   Brown, Manuel L ^a   Davis, Peter L ^a   Ferris, James V ^a   Fuhrman, Carl R ^a   Golla, Sara K ^a   Katyal, Sani ^a   Lacomis, Joan M ^a   McCook, Barry M ^a   Thaete, F Leland ^a   Warfel, Thomas E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Diagnostic radiology, observer performance; Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve; Statistical analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EXPERIENCE; HUMAN; LABORATORY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

EID: 0038037982     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2281020709     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Peterson WW, Birdsall TG, Fox WC. The theory of signal detectability. Trans Inst Radio Eng Professional Group Information Theory 1954; 4:171-212.
2. Green DM, Swets JA. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York, NY: Wiley, 1966.
3. Swets JA, Pickett RM. Evaluation of diagnostic systems: methods from signal detection theory. New York, NY: Academic, 1982.
4. Foley WD, Wilson CR, Keyes GS, et al. The effect of varying spatial resolution on the detectability of diffuse pulmonary nodules: assessment with digitized conventional radiographs. Radiology 1981; 141:25-31.
5. MacMahon H, Vyborny CJ, Metz CE, et al. Digital radiography of subtle pulmonary abnormalities: an ROC study of the effect of pixel size on observer performance. Radiology 1986; 158:21-26.
6. Slasky BS, Gur D, Good WF, et al. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images. Radiology 1990; 174:775-780.
7. Herron JM, Bender T, Campbell WL, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, Gur D. Effects of luminance and resolution on observer performance with chest radiographs. Radiology 2000; 21S:169-174.
8. Metz CE. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 1986; 221:720-733.
9. Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989; 24:234-245.
10. Brogdon BG, Kelsey CA, Moseley RD Jr. Factors affecting perception of pulmonary lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 1983; 21:633-654.
11. Ethell SC, Manning D. Effects of prevalence on visual search and decision making in fracture detection. Proc SPIE 2001; 4324:249-257.
12. Egglin TKP, Feinstein AR. Context bias: a problem in diagnostic radiology. JAMA 1996; 276:1752-1755.
13. Kundel, HL. Disease prevalence and radiological decision making. Invest Radiol 1982; 17:107-109.
14. Swensson RG, Hessel SJ, Herman PG. The value of searching films without specific preconceptions. Invest Radiol 1985; 20:100-114.
15. Kundel HL. Disease prevalence and the index of detectability: a survey of studies of lung cancer detection by chest radiography. Proc 5PIE 2000; 3981:135-144.
16. Thaete FL, Fuhrman CR, Oliver JH, et al. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162:575-581.
17. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992; 27:723-731.
18. Obuchowski NA. Multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic curve studies: hypothesis testing and sample size estimation using an analysis of variance approach with dependent observations. Acad Radiol 1995; 2:522-529.
19. Obuchowski NA, Rockette HE. Hypothesis testing of diagnostic accuracy for multiple readers and multiple tests: an ANOVA approach with dependent observations. Commun Statistics 1995; 24:285-308.
20. Abelson RP, Tukey JW. Efficient utilization of non-numerical information in quantitative analysis: general theory and the case of sample order. Ann Math Stat 1963; 34:1347-1369.
21. Page EB. Ordered hypotheses for multiple treatments: a significance test for linear ranks. J Am Stat Assoc 1963; 58:216-230.
22. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986; 73:13-22.