Multiple Imputation for Missing Data: Making the Most of What You Know

Organizational Research Methods

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 282-308

  Fichman, Mark ^a,c   Cummings, Jonathon N ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Internet use; Missing data; Multiple imputation; Multivariate analysis; Statistical estimation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038009571     PISSN: 10944281     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1094428103255532     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Allison, P. (2000). Multiple imputation for missing data: A cautionary tale. Sociological Methods and Research, 28(3), 301-309.
2. Allison, P. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Berk, R. A. (1983). An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological analysis. American Sociological Review, 48, 386-398.
4. Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamarck, T., & Hoberman, H. (1984). Measuring the functional components of social support. In I. G. Sarason (Ed.), Social support: Theory, research and applications (pp. 73-94). The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
5. Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 330-351.
6. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via them algorithm (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 39, 1-38.
7. Dillman, D. A. (1991). The design and administration of mail surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 225-249.
8. Enders, C. (2001). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(1), 128-141.
9. Fox, J. A., & Tracy, P. E. (1986). Randomized response: A method for sensitive surveys. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10. Graham, J. W., Hofer, S. M., & Piccinin, A. M. (1994). Analysis of missing data in drug prevention research. In L. M. Collins & L. A. Seitz (Eds.), Advances in data analysis for prevention intervention research (Vol. 142). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
11. Graham, J. W., & Schafer, J. (1999). On the performance of multiple imputation for multivariate data with small sample size. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Heckman, J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables, and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475-492.
13. Johnson, B. T., Mullen, B., & Salas, E. (1995). Comparison of three major meta-analytic approaches. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 94-106.
14. Kanner, A. D., Coyne, J. C., Schaefer, C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1981). Comparisons of two modes of stress measurement: Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 1-39.
15. Kiesler, S., & Kraut, R. (1999). Internet use and ties that bind. American Psychologist, 54(9), 783-784.
16. King, G., Honaker, J., Joseph, A., & Scheve, K. (2001). Analyzing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 49-69.
17. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). The Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49-74.
18. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukhopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031.
19. Little, R. J. A. (1992). Regression with missing Xs: A review. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(420), 1227-1237.
20. Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198-1202.
21. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: John Wiley.
22. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989). The analysis of social science data with missing values. Sociological Methods and Research, 18(2,3), 292-326.
23. Little, R. J. A., & Schenker, N. (1995). Missing data. In G. Arminger, C. C. Clogg, & M. E. Sobel (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 39-75). New York: Plenum.
24. Meng, X. L. (1994). Multiple imputation with uncongenial sources of input (with discussion). Statistical Science, 9, 538-574.
25. Radloff, L. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.
26. Roth, P. (1994). Missing data: A conceptual review for applied psychologists. Personnel Psychology, 47, 537-560.
27. Roth, P. L., Switzer, F. S., III, & Switzer, D. (1999). Missing data in multiple item scales: A Monte Carlo analysis of missing data techniques. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 211-232.
28. Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581-592.
29. Rubin, D. B. (1977). Formalizing subjective notions about the effect of nonrespondents in sample surveys. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72, 538-543.
30. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: John Wiley.
31. Rubin, D. B. (1996). Multiple imputation after 18+ years. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(434), 473-489.
32. Russell, D., Peplau, L., & Cutrona, C. (1980). The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472-480.
33. Russell, D., Stern, H., & Sinharay, S. (2002). An evaluation of multiple imputation as an approach to missing data. Unpublished manuscript, University of Iowa.
34. Schafer, J. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.
35. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147-177.
36. Schafer, J. L., & Olsen, M. K. (1998). Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: A data analysts perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33(4), 545-571.
37. Sinharay, S., Stern, H. S., & Russell, D. (2001). The use of multiple imputation for the analysis of missing data. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 317-329.
38. Stolzenberg, R. M., & Relles, D. A. (1990). Theory testing in a world of constrained research design: The significance of Heckman's censored sampling bias correction for nonexperimental research. Sociological Methods & Research, 18(4), 395-415.
39. Tanner, M. A., & Wong, W. H. (1987). The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 528-550.
40. West, S. (2001). New approaches to missing data in psychological research: Introduction to the special section. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 315-316.