Mobility strategies and site structure: A case study of Inamgaon

Journal of Anthropological Archaeology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 105-125

  Panja, Sheena ^a  

^a VISVA BHARATI UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038008532     PISSN: 02784165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0278-4165(03)00005-9     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Binford, L.R., 1983. Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, New York.
2. Binford, L.R., 1987. Researching ambiguity: frames of reference and site structure. In: Kent, S. (Ed.), Method and Theory for Activity Area Research: An Ethnoarchaeological Approach. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 449-512.
3. Binford, L.R., 1990. Mobility, housing and environment: a comparitive study. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 46, 119-152.
4. Cameron, C.M., Tomka, S.A., 1993. Abandonment of Settlements and Regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. Carr, C., 1984. The nature of organization of intrasite archaeological records and spatial analytic approaches to their investigation. In: Schiffer, M.B. (Ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 7. Academic Press, New York, pp. 103-211.
6. Cribb, R., 1991. Nomads in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Davidson, I., 1983. Site variability and prehistoric economy in Levante. In: Bailey, G. (Ed.), Hunter-gatherer in Prehistory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 79-95.
8. Dhavalikar, M.K., 1988. The First Farmers of the Deccan. Ravish Publishers, Pune.
9. Dhavalikar, M.K., Sankalia, H.D., Ansari, Z.D., 1988. Excavations at Inamgaon, vols. I and II. Deccan College Post-Graduate Research Institute, Pune.
10. Douglas, W.C., 1994. Identification and assessment of secondary refuse aggregates. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1, 41-68.
11. Flannery, K.V., 1972. The origins of the village as a settlement type in Mesoamerica and the near east: a comparitive study. In: Ucko, P.J., Tringham, R., Dimbleby, G.W. (Eds.), Man, Settlement and Urbanism. Duckworth, London, pp. 23-53.
12. Graham, M., 1989. Raramuri residential site structure: an ethnoarchaeological approach to settlement organization. Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
13. Hietala, H.J., 1984. Intrasite Spatial Analysis in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
14. Hill, J.N., 1970. Broken K Pueblo: Prehistoric Social organization in the American Southwest. Anthropological papers of the University of Arizona 18, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
15. Hitchcock, R.K., 1987. Sedentism and site structure: organizational change in Kalahari Basarwa residential locations. In: Kent, S. (Ed.), Method and Theory for Activity Area Research. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 374-423.
16. Hodder, I., 1989. This is not an article about material culture as text. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8, 250-269.
17. Hodder, I., 1990. The Domestication of Europe. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
18. Hunter-Anderson Rosalind, L., 1977. A theoretical approach to the study of house form. In: Binford, L.R. (Ed.), For Theory Building in Archaeology, Essays on Faunal Remains, Aquatic Resources, Spatial Analysis, and Systemic Modeling. Academic Press, New York, pp. 287-317.
19. Kajale, M.D., 1988. Plant economy. In: Dhavalikar, M.K., Sankalia, H.D., Ansari, Z.D. (Eds.), Excavations at Inamgaon, vol. I, Pt. ii. Deccan College Post-Graduate Research Institute, Pune, pp. 727-823.
20. Kelly, R.L., 1992. Mobility/sedentism: concepts, archaeological measures, and effects. Annual Review of Anthropology 21, 43-66.
21. Kent, S., 1984. Analyzing Activity Areas. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.
22. Kent, S., 1992. Studying variability in the archaeological record: an ethnoarchaeological model for distinguishing mobility patterns. American Antiquity 57 (4), 635-660.
23. Killion, T.W., 1990. Cultivation intensity and residential site structure: an ethnoarchaeological examination of peasant agriculture in the Sierra De Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico. Latin American Antiquity 1 (3), 191-215.
24. Krishnamurthy, R.V. et al., 1981. Palaeo-climatic influences from the behaviour of radio-carbon dates of carbonates from sand dunes of Rajasthan. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences 90, 155-160.
25. Kroll, E.M., Price, T.D., 1991. The Interpretation of Archaeological Spatial Patterning. Plenum Press, New York.
26. Moore, H.L., 1986. Space, Text and Gender. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
27. Mujumdar, G.G., Rajaguru, S.N., 1965. Comments on soils as environmental and chronological tool. In: Misra, V.N., Mate, M.S. (Eds.), Indian Prehistory - 1964. Deccan College Post Graduate Research, Pune, pp. 248-253.
28. Murray, P., 1980. Discard location: the ethnographic data. American Antiquity 45, 490-502.
29. Nash, D.T., Petraglia, M.D. (Eds.), 1987. Natural Formation Processes and the Archaeological Record. BAR, International Series 352, Oxford.
30. O'Connell, J.F., 1987. Alyawara site structure and its archaeological implications. American Antiquity 52 (1), 74-108.
31. Panja, S., 1996. Mobility strategies, site structure and subsistence-settlement organization: a case study of the Chalcolithic in the middle Bhima valley with special reference to Inamgaon. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, University of Poona, Pune.
32. Panja, S., 1996b. Mobility strategies, site structure and settlement organization - an actualistic perspective. Man and Environment 21 (1), 58-73.
33. Panja, S., 2000. A re-analysis of houses: the evidence from Inamgaon, Maharashtra. Bulletin of the Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute 58, 93-104.
34. Panja, S., 1999. Mobility and Subsistence Strategies at Inamgaon. A Chalcolithic Site in Western India. Asian Perspectives 38 (2), 154-186.
35. Pawankar, S., 1996. Archaeozoology at Inamgaon. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, University of Poona, Pune.
36. Petraglia, M., 1987. Site Formation processes at the Abri Dufaure: a study of upper palaeolithic rockshelter and hillslope deposits in southwestern France. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
37. Rafferty, J.E., 1985. The archaeological record on sedentariness: recognition, development, and implications. In: Schiffer, M.B. (Ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 8. Academic Press, New York, pp. 113-155.
38. Rothschild, N.A., Mills, B.J., Ferguson, T.J., Dublin, S., 1993. Abandonment at Zuni farming villages. In: Cameron, C.A., Tomka, S.A. (Eds.), Abandonment of Settlements and Re- gions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 123-137.
39. Sadr, K., 1991. The Development of Nomadism in Ancient Northeast Africa. Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
40. Schiffer, M.B., 1987. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.
41. Schlanger, S., 1992. Recognizing persistent places in Anasazi settlement systems. In: Rossignol, J., Wandsnider, L. (Eds.), Space, Time and Archaeological Landscapes. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 91-112.
42. Simek, J.F., 1989. Structure and diversity in intrasite spatial analysis. In: Leonard, D.R., Jones, G.T. (Eds.), Quantifying Diversity in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
43. Simms, S.R., 1988. The archaeological structure of a Bedouin camp. Journal of Archaeological Science 15, 197-211.
44. Stafford, R., 1985. Hunter-gatherer settlement strategies: a regional perspective on intra-site spatial analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology in the Symposium Beyond Ethnoarchaeology: Adaptive Strategies of Forager-Collectors from the Archaeological Record. Denver.
45. Stevenson, M.G., 1982. Toward an understanding of site abandonment behaviour: evidence from historic mining camps in the southwest Yukon. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1, 237-265.
46. Thomas, J., 1991. Rethinking the Neolithic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
47. Wandsnider, L.A., 1987. Natural formation procees experimentation and archaeological analysis. In: Nash, D.T., Petraglia, M.D. (Eds.), Natural Formation Processes and the Archaeological Record. BAR International Series 352, pp. 150-185.
48. Wandsnider L.A., 1989. Long-term land use, formation processes and the structure of the archaeological landscape: a case study from southern Wyoming. Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
49. Wandsnider, L.A., 1992. The spatial dimension of time. In: Rossignol, J., Wandsnider, L. (Eds.), Space, Time and Archaeological Landscapes. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 257-282.
50. Wandsnider, L.A., 1996. Describing and comparing archaeological spatial structures. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 3 (4), 319-383.
51. Wilk, R., 1983. Little house in the jungle: the causes of variation in house size among modern Kekchi Maya. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2, 99-116.
52. Wilseden, L.E., 1982. The study of impacts on archaeological sites. In: Schiffer, M.B. (Ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 5. Academic Press, New York, pp. 51-96.
53. Wood, W.R., Johnson, D.L., 1978. A survey of disturbance processes in archaeological site formation. In: Schiffer, M.B. (Ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, pp. 315-381.
54. Wylie, A., 1989. Archaeological cables and tacking: the implications of practice for Bernstein's 'options beyond objectivism and relativism'. Philosophy of Social Science 19, 1-18.
55. Wylie, A., 1990. The interpretive dilemma. In: Pinsky, V., Wylie, A. (Eds.), Critical Traditions in Contemporary Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 18-28.
56. Yellen, J., 1977. Archaeological Approaches to the Present. Academic Press, New York.