Continuing debate in the face of biodiversity loss

Oikos

Volumn 100, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 619-

  Naeem, Shahid ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037986635     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12465.x     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Loreau, M. Naeem, S. and Inchausti, P. 2002. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: synthesis and perspectives. - Oxford Univ. Press.
2. Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Inchausti, P. et al. 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. - Science 294: 804-808.
3. Naeem, S. 2002. Ecosystem consequences of biodiversity loss. The evolution of a paradigm. - Ecology 83: 1537-1552.
4. Pfisterer, A. B. and Schmid, B. 2002. Diversity-dependent production can decrease the stability of ecosystem functioning. - Nature 410: 809-812.
5. Schmid, B. and Pfisterer, A. B. 2003. Species vs community perspectives in biodiversity experiments. - Oikos 100: 620-621.
6. Schulze, E. D. and Mooney, H. A., eds. 1993. Biodiversity and ecosystem function. - Springer Verlag.
7. Wardle, D. A. and Grime, J. P. 2003. Biodiversity and stability of grassland ecosystem functioning. - Oikos 100: 622-623.