Hungry predators render predator-avoidance behavior in tadpoles ineffective

Oikos

Volumn 100, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 311-316

  Altwegg, Res ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; AVOIDANCE REACTION; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

AESHNA; AESHNA CYANEA; ANAX; ANAX IMPERATOR; ANURA; DYTISCUS; DYTISCUS MARGINALIS; INVERTEBRATA; RANA LESSONAE;

EID: 0037986581     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12206.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abrams, P. A. 1990. The evolution of anti-predator traits in prey in response to evolutionary change in predators. - Oikos 59: 147-156.
2. Abrams, P. A. 2000. The evolution of predator-prey interactions: theory and evidence. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 79-105.
3. Allison, P. D. 1995. Survival analysis using the SAS System. - SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
4. Anholt, B. R. and Werner, E. E. 1995. Interaction between food availability and predation mortality mediated by adaptive behavior. - Ecology 76: 2230-2234.
5. Anholt, B. R. and Werner, E. E. 1998. Predictable changes in predation mortality as a consequence of changes in food availability and predation risk. - Evol. Ecol. 12: 729-738.
6. Azevedo-Ramos, C., Van Sluys, M., Hero, J.-M. and Magnusson, W. E. 1992. Influence of tadpole movement on predation by odonate naiads. - J. Herpetol. 26: 335-338.
7. Brown, J. S., Laundré, J. W. and Gurung, M. 1999. The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. - J. Mammal. 80: 385-399.
8. Cox, D. R. 1972. Regression models and life tables. - J. R. Stat. Soc. B34: 187-220.
9. Eklöv, P. and Halvarsson, C. 2000. The trade-off between foraging activity and predation risk for Rana temporaria in different food environments. - Can. J. Zool. 78: 734-739.
10. Folsom, T. C. and Collins, N. C. 1984. The diet and foraging behavior of the larval dragonfly Anax junius (Aeshnidae), with an assessment of the role of refuges and prey activity. - Oikos 42: 105-113.
11. Formanowicz, D. R. 1987. Foraging tactics of Dytiscus verticalis larvae (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae): prey detection, reactive distance and predator size. - J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 60: 92-99.
12. Fryxell, J. M. and Lundberg, P. 1997. Individual behavior and community dynamics. - Chapman & Hall.
13. Gerritsen, J. and Strickler, J. R. 1977. Encounter probabilities and community structure in zooplankton: a mathematical model. - J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 34: 549-557.
14. Gosner, N. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. - Herpetologica 16: 183-190.
15. Huey, R. B. and Pianka, E. R. 1981. Ecological consequences of foraging mode. - Ecology 62: 991-999.
16. Ives, A. R. and Dobson, A. P. 1987. Antipredator behavior and the population dynamics of simple predator-prey systems. - Am. Nat. 130: 431-437.
17. Lawler, S. P. 1989. Behavioural responses to predators and predation risk in four species of larval anurans. - Anim. Behav. 38: 1039-1047.
18. Lima, S. L. 1998. Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. - Adv. Stud. Behav. 27: 215-290.
19. Lima, S. L. 2002. Putting predators back into behavioral predator-prey interactions. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 70-75.
20. Lima, S. L. and Dill, L. M. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. - Can. J. Zool. 68: 619-640.
21. McCollum, S. A. and Van Buskirk, J. 1996. Costs and benefits of a predator-induced polyphenism in the gray treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis. - Evolution 50: 583-593.
22. Morin, P. J. 1983. Predation, competition, and the composition of larval anuran guilds. - Ecol. Monogr. 53: 119-138.
23. Peckarsky, B. L. 1996. Alternative predator avoidance syndromes of stream-dwelling mayfly larvae. - Ecology 77: 1888-1905.
24. SAS Institute Inc. 1996. SAS/STAT Software: changes and enhancements through release 6.11. - SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
25. Skelly, D. K. 1992. Field evidence for a cost of behavioral antipredator response in a larval amphibian. - Ecology 73: 704-708.
26. Skelly, D. K. 1994. Activity level and the susceptibility of anuran larvae to predation. - Anim. Behav. 47: 465-468.
27. Skelly, D. K. and Werner, E. E. 1990. Behavioral and life-historical responses of larval American toads to an odonate predator. - Ecology 71: 2313-2322.
28. Van Buskirk, J. 2001. Specific induced responses to different predator species in anuran larvae. - J. Evol. Biol. 14: 482-489.
29. Van Buskirk, J. and McCollum, S. A. 2000. Functional mechanisms of an inducible defence in tadpoles: morphology and behaviour influence mortality risk from predation. - J. Evol. Biol. 13: 336-347.
30. Werner, E. E. and Anholt, B. R. 1993. Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity. - Am. Nat. 142: 242-272.