Advantages and disadvantages of coils for transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 157-163

  Galal, M Omar ^a  

^a KING FAISAL SPECIALIST HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEFALOTIN; OCCLUDING SPRING EMBOLI;

AORTA COARCTATION; ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; BALLOON DILATATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEVICE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEMOLYSIS; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; PATENT DUCTUS ARTERIOSUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY STENOSIS; SAFETY; TECHNIQUE; THROMBOEMBOLISM;

EID: 0037960381     PISSN: 08964327     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8183.2003.08029.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Porstmann W, Wierny L, Warnke H. Closure of the persistent ductus arteriosus without thoracotomy. Ger Med Mon 1967;12:259-261.
2. Rashkind WJ, Cuaso CC. Transcatheter closure of a patent ductus arteriosus: Successful use in a 3.5 kg infant. Pediatr Cardiol 1979;1:3-7.
3. Rao PS, Kim SH, Choi JY, et al. Follow-up results of transvenous occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus with the buttoned device. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:820-826.
4. Masura J, Walsh KP, Thanopoulous B, et al. Catheter closure of moderate- to large-sized patent ductus arteriosus using the new Amplatzer duct occluder: Immediate and short-term results. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:878-882.
5. Cambier PA, Kirby WC, Wortham DC, et al. Percutaneous closure of the small (<2.5mm) patent ductus arteriosus using coil embolization. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:815-816.
6. Allen HD, Beekman III RH, Garson Jr A, et al. AHA scientific statement. Pediatric Therapeutic Cardiac Catheterization. A statement for Healthcare Professionals from the council on cardiovascular disease in the Young. American Heart Association. Circulation 1998;97:609-625.
7. Chuang VP, Wallace S, Gianturco C. A new improved coil for tapered-tip catheter for arterial occlusion. Radiology 1980;135:507-509.
8. Prieto LR, DeCamillo DM, Konrad DJ, et al. Comparison of cost and clinical outcome between transcatheter coil occlusion and surgical closure of isolated patent ductus arteriosus. Pediatrics 1998;101:1020-1024.
9. Zellers TM, Wylie KD, Moake L. Transcatheter coil occlusion of the small patent ductus arteriosus (<4 mm): Improved results with a "multiple coil-no residual shunt" strategy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;49:307-313.
10. Fedderly RT, Beckman III RH, Mosea RS, et al. Comparison of hospital charges for closure of patent ductus arteriosus by surgery and by transcatheter coil occlusion. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:776-779.
11. Hijazi ZM, Geggel RL. Results of anterograde transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus using single or multiple Gianturco coils. Am J Cardiol 1994;74:925-929.
12. Sommer RH, Gutierrez A, Lai WW, et al. Use of performed nitinol snare to improve transcatheter coil delivery in occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus, Am Heart J 1994;74:836-839.
13. Hays MD, Hoyer MH, Glasow PF. New forceps delivery technique for coil occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:209-211.
14. Dalvi B, Goyal V, Narula D, et al. New technique using temporary balloon occlusion for transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus with Gianturco coils. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997;41:62-70.
15. Kuhn MA, Latson LA. Transcatheter embolization coil closure of patent ductus arteriosus - Modified delivery for enhanced control during coil positioning. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1995;36:288-290.
16. Tyrian M, Huggon I, Rosenthal E, et al. Coil occlusion of the arterial duct. J Interven Cardiol 1999;12:73-77.
17. Wierny L, Plass R. Twenty-five years of experience from transfemoral catheter closure or patent ductus arteriosus. J Interven Cardiol 1991;4:301-310.
18. Galal MO, Bulbul Z, Kakadekar A, et al. Comparison between the safety profile and clinical results of the Cook detachable and Gianturco coils for transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus. J Interven Cardiol 2001;14:169-178.
19. Tomita H, Fuse S, Hatakeyama K, et al. Stretching of the ductus: An important factor in determining the outcome of coil occlusion. Jpn Circ J 1999;63:593-596.
20. Tomita H, Fuse S, Akagi T, et al. Hemolysis complicating coil occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998;43:50-53.
21. Galal O, de Moor M, Al-Fadley F, et al. Problems encountered during introduction of Gianturco coils for transcatheter occlusion of the patent arterial duct. Eur Heart J 1997;18:625-630.
22. Krichenko A, Benson LN, Burrows P, et al. Angiographic classification of the isolated, persistently patent ductus arteriosus and implications for percutaneous catheter occlusion. Am J Cardiol 1989;63:877-880.
23. Yu Shun Z, Hulan L, Zhengxue D, et al. The size and configuration of patent ductus arteriosus does not influence the therapy effect using the Amplatzer Duct Occluder. (Abstract). 5th International Workshop Catheter Interventions in Congenital Heart Disease, Frankfurt, Germany, June 6-8, 2002.
24. Podnar T, Gavora P, Masura J. Percutaneous closure of patent ductus arteriosus: Complementary use of detachable Cook patent ductus arteriosus coils and Amplatzer duct occluders. Eur J Pediat 2000;159:293-296.
25. Zhang Z, Qian M, Wang H, et al. Transcatheter closure in 354 pediatric cases of patent ductus arteriosus using five different devices. Chin Med J 2001;114:456-458.
26. Alwi M, Kang LM, Samion H, et al. Transcatheter occlusion of native persistent ductus arteriosus using conventional Gianturco coils. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:1430-1432.
27. Galal O, von Sinner W, Al-Fadley F, et al. Radiographic characteristics of Cook detachable and Gianturco coils as well as clinical results of transcatheter closure of the patent ductus arteriosus. Zeitschrift Kardiol 1999;88:1006-1014.
28. Hwang B, Lee PC, Weng ZC, et al. Comparison of the one-and a-half year results of closure of patent ductus arteriosus by transcatheter coils placement with surgical ligation. Angiology 2000;51:757-763.
29. Hofbeck M, Bartolomaeus G, Buheitel G, et al. Safety and efficacy of interventional occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus with detachable coils: A multicentre experience. Eur J Pediatr 2000;159:331-337.
30. Hijazi ZM, Geggel RL. Transcatheter closure of large patent ductus arteriosus (> or = 4 mm) with multiple Gianturco coils: Immediate and mid-term results. Heart 1996;76:536-540.
31. Owada CY, Teitel DF, Moore P, Evaluation of Gianturco coils for closure of large (>3.5 mm) patent ductus arteriosus. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1856-1862.
32. Shim D, Fedderly RT, Beekman III RH, et al. Follow-up of coil occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:207-211.
33. Wang JK, Liau CS, Huang JJ, et al. Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus using Gianturco coils in adolescents and adults. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;55:513-518.
34. Kapoor H, Radhakrishnan S, Shrivastava S. Severe intravascular haemolysis following coil occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus. Indian Heart J 1996;48:173-174.
35. Perez Rodriguez MJ, Quero Jimenez MC, Herraiz Sarachaga I, et al. Intravascular hemolysis following percutaneous occlusion of the ductus arteriosus. Rev Esp Cardiol 1999;52:449-450.
36. Lee C, Hsieh K, Huang T, et al. Spontaneous resolution of hemolysis after partial coil occlusion of ductus arteriosus. Pediatr Cardiol 1999;20:371-372.
37. Chantepie A, Pezard P, Magontier N, et al. Acute intravascular hemolysis after complete occlusion of a patent ductus arteriosus by detachable coils. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 2000;93:619-622.
38. Godart F, Rodes J, Rey C. Severe haemolysis after transcatheter closure of a patent arterial duct with the new Amplatzer duct occluder. Cardiol Young 2000;10:265-267.
39. Uzun O, Veldtman GR, Dickinson DF, et al. Haemolysis following implantation of duct occlusion coils. Heart 1999;81:160-161.