Maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods for estimating the distribution of selective effects among classes of mutations using DNA polymorphism data

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 91-103

  Bustamante, Carlos D ^a,b   Nielsen, Rasmus ^b   Hartl, Daniel L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b 434 Warren Hall ^*  (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian statistics; EM algorithm; Gibbs sampling; Hierarchical models; MCMC; Poisson random field; Population genetics; SNPs

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; DNA; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; MUTATION; NATURAL SELECTION; POLYMORPHISM; POPULATION GENETICS;

DNA;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MUTATION; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; POPULATION GENETICS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES;

BAYES THEOREM; DNA; GENETICS, POPULATION; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MUTATION; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SELECTION (GENETICS); UNITED STATES;

EID: 0037944231     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0040-5809(02)00050-3     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Akashi H. Inferring the fitness effects of DNA mutations from polymorphism and divergence data. statistical power to detect directional selection under stationarity and free recombination Genetics. 151:1999;221-238.
2. Braverman J.M., Hudson R.R., Kaplan N.L., Langley C.H., Stephan W. The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics. 140:1995;783-796.
3. Bustamante C.D., Wakeley J., Sawyer S., Hartl D.L. Directional selection and the site-frequency spectrum. Genetics. 159:2001;1779-1788.
4. Dempster A.P., Laird N.M., Rubin D.B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. (with discussion) J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, Methodological. 39:1977;1-37.
5. Donnelly P., Nordborg M., Joyce P. Likelihoods and simulation methods for a class of nonneutral population genetics models. Genetics. 159:2001;853-867.
6. Ewens W.J. The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. Theor. Popul. Biol. 3:1972;87-112.
7. Fay J.C., Wu C.I. Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics. 155:2000;1405-1413.
8. Fu Y.X. Estimating effective population size or mutation rate using the frequencies of mutations of various classes in a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics. 138:1994;1375-1386.
9. Fu Y.X. New statistical tests of neutrality for DNA samples from a population. Genetics. 143:1996;557-570.
10. Fu Y.X., Li W.H. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics. 133:1993;693-709.
11. Gelman A., Carlin J.S., Stern H.S., Rubin D.B. Bayesian Data Analysis. 1997;Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, FL.
12. Hartl D.L., Moriyama E.N., Sawyer S.A. Selection intensity for codon bias. Genetics. 138:1994;227-234.
13. Hastings W.K. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika. 57:1970;97-109.
14. Hudson R.R., Kaplan N.L. The coalescent process in models with selection and recombination. Genetics. 120:1988;831-840.
15. Kaplan N.L., Darden T., Hudson R.R. The coalescent process in models with selection. Genetics. 120:1988;819-829.
16. Kaplan N.L., Hudson R.R., Langley C.H. The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics. 123:1989;887-899.
17. Kaplan N., Hudson R.R., Iizuka M. The coalescent process in models with selection, recombination and geographic subdivision. Genet. Res. 57:1991;83-91.
18. Krone S.M., Neuhauser C. Ancestral processes with selection. Theor. Popul. Biol. 51:1997;210-237.
19. Lewontin R.C. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. 1974;Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
20. Lewontin R.C., Krakauer J. Distribution of gene frequency as a test of the theory of the selective neutrality of polymorphisms. Genetics. 74:1973;175-195.
21. Metropolis N., Rosenbluth A.W., Rosenbluth M.N., Teller A.H., Teller E. Equation of state calculations for fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21:1953;1087-1092.
22. Moran P.A.P. The statistical processes of evolutionary theory. 1962;Clarendon Press, Oxford.
23. Neuhauser C., Krone S.M. The genealogy of samples in models with selection. Genetics. 145:1997;519-534.
24. Nielsen R. Statistical tests of selective neutrality in the age of genomics. Heredity. 86:2001;641-647.
25. Sawyer S.A., Hartl D.L. Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence. Genetics. 132:1992;1161-1176.
26. Sawyer S.A., Dykhuizen D.E., Hartl D.L. Confidence interval for the number of selectively neutral amino acid polymorphisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 84:1987;6225-6228.
27. Simonsen K.L., Churchill G.A., Aquadro C.F. Properties of statistical tests of neutrality for DNA polymorphism data Genetics. 141:1995;413-429.
28. Slade P.F. Most recent common ancestor probability distributions in gene genealogies under selection. Theor. Popul. Biol. 58:2000;291-305.
29. Slade P.F. Simulation of selected genealogies. Theor. Popul. Biol. 57:2000;35-49.
30. Slade P.F. Simulation of "hitch-hiking" genealogies. J. Math. Biol. 41:2001;41-70.
31. Slatkin M. An exact test for neutrality based on the Ewens sampling distribution. Genet. Res. 64:1994;71-74.
32. Slatkin M. A correction to the exact test based on the Ewens sampling distribution. Genet. Res. 68:1996;259-260.
33. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 123:1989;585-595.
34. Watterson G.A. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. 7:1975;256-276.
35. Wright, S., 1949. Adaptation and selection. In: Jepson, G.G.S.G.L., Mayr, E. (Eds.), Genetics, Paleontology and Evolution, Princeton, Princeton, NJ, 1949 pp.
36. Wright S. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Vol. 2: The Theory of Gene Frequencies. 1969;University of Chicago Press, Chicago.