The television text: Spectatorship, ideology, and the organization of consent

Critical Studies in Media Communication

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 436-451

  Bagley, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037933673     PISSN: 15295036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07393180128093     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Althusser, L. (1969). For Marx. (B. Brewster, Trans.). London: New Left Books.
2. Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy. (B. Brewster, Trans.). London: New Left Books.
3. Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. (A. Lavers, Trans.). New York: Hill and Wang.
4. Bennett, T., Martin, G., Mercer, C., & Woollacott, J. (Eds.). (1981). Culture, ideology and social process. London: The Open University Press.
5. Cronman, R. (1980). Do readers make meaning? In S. R. Suleiman & I. Crosman (Eds.), The reader in the text: Essays on audience and interpretation (pp. 149-164). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
6. Dejanews.com. (1998). Deja News, the discussion network. (Internet-http://www.dejanews.com/ dnquery.xp?QRY=the+real+world&DBS=2&maxhits=25&format= terse&showsort=score& ST=QS&LNG=ALL).
7. Dilthey, W. (1990). The human studies. In J. C. Alexander & S. Seidman (Eds.), Culture and society: Contemporary debates (pp. 31-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Eagleton, T. (1983). Literary theory: An introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. N. Y.: Basic Books.
10. Gouldner, A. (1990). Ideology, the cultural apparatus, and the new consciousness industry. The human studies. In J. C. Alexander & S. Seidman (Eds.), Culture and society: Contemporary debates (pp. 303-316). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Graham, J., & Bianco, R. (1998). Fans will be singing auld lang "Sein." USA Today. (Internet-http:// www.usatoday.com/life/enter/tv/let114.html).
12. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. (Q. Hoare & G. Nowell-Smith, Eds. and Trans.). London: Lawrence and Wishart.
13. Hall, S. (1986). The problem of ideology: Marxism without guarantees. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10(2), 28-44.
14. Harvey, S. (1978). May '68 and film culture. London: British Film Institute Publications.
15. Hawkins, R. P., Pingree, S., Bruce, L., & Tapper, J. (1997). Strategy and style in attention to television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 41, 245-264.
16. Hoijer, B. (1992). Socio-cognitive structures and television reception. Media, Culture and Society, 14, 583-603.
17. Iser, W. (1974). The implied reader: Patterns of communication in prose fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18. Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
19. Katz, E. (1988). On conceptualizing media effects: another look. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Television as a social issue. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
20. Livingstone, S. M. (1991). Audience reception: the role of the viewer in retelling romantic drama. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 285-306). London: Edward Arnold.
21. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1974). The German ideology. (C. J. Arthur, Trans.), London: Lawrence and Wishart.
22. Mayne, J. (1995). Paradoxes of spectatorship. In L. Williams (Ed.), Viewing positions: Ways of seeing film (pp. 155-183). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
23. Medsger, B. (1996). Winds of change: Challenges confronting journalism education. Arlington: The Freedom Forum.
24. Metallinos, N. (1999). Theory into practice: the transformation of biological precepts into mental concepts in recognizing visual images. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 43, 432-442.
25. Metz, C. (1982). The imaginary signifier: Psychoanalysis and the cinema. (C. Britton, A. William, B. Brewster, & A. Guzzetti, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
26. Montrose, L. A. (1989). Professing the Renaissance: the poetics and politics of culture. In H. A. Veeser (Ed.), The new historian. N. Y.: Routledge.
27. Morley, D. (1985). Cultural transformations: the politics of resistance. Mass Communication Review Yearbook, 5, 237-50.
28. Morris, M. (1988). Banality in cultural studies. Block, 14, 15-16.
29. Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6-18.
30. Munsterberg, H. (1916). The photoplay: A psychological study. New York: D. Appleton.
31. Newhagen, J. E. (1998). TV news images that induce anger, fear, and disgust: effects on approach-avoidance and memory. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 42, 265-276.
32. NFL.com. (1998). Super Bowl news. (Internet-http://www.nfl.com/sb33/news/981204facts.html).
33. People's Choice. (1997, February 5). Broadcasting and Cable, p. 64.
34. People's Choice. (1997, October 13). Broadcasting and Cable, p. 38.
35. Press, A. L. (1996). Toward a qualitative methodology of audience study: using ethnography to study the popular culture audience. In J. Hay, L. Grossberg, & E. Wartella (Eds.), The audience and its landscape (pp. 113-13). Boulder: Westview Press.
36. Smith, M. (1994). Altered states: character and emotional response in the cinema. Cinema Journal, 33(4), 34-56.
37. Suleiman, S. R. (1980). Introduction. In S. R. Suleiman & I. Crosman (Eds.), The reader in the text: Essays on audience and interpretation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
38. Volosinov, V. I. (1973). L. Matejka & I. R. Titunik (Trans.), Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.
39. Wild, D. (1994, May 19). Melrose Place is a really good show. Rolling Stone, 682, pp. 48-53, 74, 108.
40. Williams, L. (1995). Viewing positions: Ways of seeing film. New Brunswick: Rutgers University.