Toward a qualitative methodology of audience study: Using ethnography to study the popular culture audience

The Audience and its Landscape

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 113-130

  Press, Andrea L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002079580     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780429496813     Document Type: Chapter

References (95)

1. Acker, Joel (1973). Women and social stratification: A case of intellectural sexism. American Journal of Sociology 78: 936-945.
2. Allor, Martin (1988). Relocating the site of the audience. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 5(3): 217-233.
3. Benedict, Ruth (1934). Patterns of Culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
4. Becker, Howard (1963). The Outsiders. New York: Free Press.
5. Bennett, Tony, and Janet Woollacott (1987). Bond and Beyond: The Political Career of a Popular Hero. New York: Methuen.
6. Bernstein, Richard J. (1983). Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
7. Bottomore, Tom, et al. (eds.) (1983). A Dictionary of Marxist Thought. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
8. Bulmer, Martin (1984). The Chicago School of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Clifford, James, and George E. Marcus (1986). Writing Culture. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
10. Corrigan, Philip, and Paul Willis (1980). Cultural forms and class mediations. Media, Culture, and Society 2: 297-312.
11. Dahrendorf, Ralf (1959). Class and Class conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
12. Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari (1977). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Robert Hurley, Mark Seem, and Helen R. Lane. New York: Viking Press. (Originally published 1972.)
13. Delli-Carpini, Michael, and Bruce A. Williams (1990). The television audience: implications for political theory. Paper delivered at the June, 1990, Meetings of the International Communication Association, Dublin.
14. Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Paul Rabinow (1982). Michel Foucault. Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs (1970). Woman’s Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16. Felson, Marcus, and David Knoke (1974). Social status and the married woman. Journal of Marriage and the Family 36: 516-521.
17. Fiske, John (1986). Television and popular culture. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 3(3): 200-216.
18. Fiske, John.(1987). Television Culture. London and New York: Methuen.
19. Fiske, John.(1990). Critical response: Meaningful moments. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 5(3): 246-251.
20. Foucault, Michel (1973). The Order of Things. New York: Mintage.
21. Foucault, Michel.(1988). Politics, Philosophy, Culture. Translated by Alan Sheridan et al. New York: Routledge.
22. Fraser, Nancy, and Linda J. Nicholson (1990). Social criticism without philosophy: An encounter between feminism and postmodernism. In Linda J. Nicholson (ed.), Feminism\Postmodernism, pp. 19-39. New York and London: Routledge.
23. Friedrich, Paul (1986). The Princes of Naranja: An Essay in Anthrohistorical Method. Austin: University of Texas Press.
24. Gans, Herbett J. (1962). The Urban Villagers. New York: Free Press.
25. Geertz, Clifford (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
26. Geertz, Clifford.(1988). Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
27. Giddens, Anthony (1973). The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies. New York: Harper 8; Row.
28. Grossberg, Lawrence (1987). The In-Difference of television. Screen 28(2): 28-45.
29. Grossberg, Lawrence.(1988). Wandering audiences, nomadic critics. Cultural Studies 2(3): 377-391.
30. Grossberg, Lawrence.(1989). On the road with three ethnographers. Journal of Communication Inquiry 13(2): 23-26
31. Hacker, Helen (1951). Women as minority group. Social Forces 30: 60-69.
32. Hall, Stuart (1986a). The problem of ideology: Marxism without guarantees. Journal of Communication 10(2): 28-44.
33. Hall, Stuart.(1986b). On postmidernism and articulation: An interview. Journal of Communication Inquiry 10(Summer): 45-60.
34. Hartmann, Heidi, and Amy Bridges (1974) Pedagogy by the oppressed. Review of Radical Political Economics 6: 75-79.
35. Hartmann, Heidi, and Amy Bridges.(1979). The unhappy marriage of marxism and feminism: Towards a more progressive union. Capital and Class (Summer).
36. Jackson, Jean E. (1990). I am a fieldnote’: Fieldnotes as a symbol of professional identity. In Roger Sanjek (ed.), Fieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
37. Jensen, Klaus Bruhn (1987). Qualitative audience research: Toward and integrative approach to reception. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 4(1): 21-36.
38. Kottak, Conrad Phillip (ed.) (1982). Researching American Culture. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press.
39. Kuhn, Thomes S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Lombo, Ronald, and Kenneth H. Tucker, Jr (1990). Culture, television, and opposition: Rethinking cultural studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7(2): 97-116.
41. Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1963). Structural Anthropology. Translated by Clair Jacobson and Brook Grundfest Schoepf. New York: Basic Books.
42. Lévi-Strauss, Claude.(1974). Tristes Tropiques. Translated by John and Doreen Weightman. New York: Atheneum.
43. Lévi-Strauss, Claude.(1975). The Raw and the Cooked. Translated by John and Doreen Weightman. New York: Harper & Row.
44. Lindlof, Thomas R. (ed.) (1987). Natural Audiences. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
45. Lindlof, Thomas R. (ed.).(1988). Media audiences as interpretive communities. Communication Yearbook 11:81-107.
46. Lindlof, Thomas R., and Timothy P. Meyer (1987). Mediated communication as ways of seeing, acting, and constructing culture: The tools and foundations of qualitative research. In Thomas R. Lindlof (ed.), Natural Audiences, pp. 1-32. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex.
47. Lulli James (1987a). Critical response: Audience texts and contexts. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 4(3): 318-322.
48. Lulli James.(1987b). Critical response: The audience as nuisance. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 5(3): 239-243.
49. Malinowski, Bronislaw (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. New York: E. P. Dutton.
50. Marcus, George E., and Michael M. J. Fischer (1986). Anthropology as Cultural Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51. Mascia-Lees, Frances E., Patricia Sharpe, and Colleen Ballerino Cohen (1989). The postmodernist turn in Anthropology: Cautions from a feminist perspective. Signs 15(11): 7-33.
52. McRobbie, Angela (1978). Working-class girls and the culture of femininity. In Women’s Studies Groups (eds.), Women Take Issue, pp. 96-108. London: Hutchinson.
53. McRobbie, Angela.(1980). Settling accounts with subcultures: A feminist critique. Screen Education 34: 37-49.
54. Middleton, Chris (1974). Sexual inequality and stratification theory. In Frank Parkin (ed.), The Social Analysis of Class Structure, pp. 179-203. London: Tavistock.
55. Milkman, Ruth (1986). Women’s history and the Sears case. Feminist Studies 12(2).
56. Milkman, Ruth.(1987). Gender at Work: The Dynamics of Job Segregation by Sex During World War II. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
57. Millett, Kate (1971). Sexual Politics. New York: Avon.
58. Morley, David (1980). The “Nationwide” Audience: Structure and Decoding. London: British Film Institute Television Monograph, No. 11.
59. Morley, David.(1986). Family Television. London: Comedia.
60. Nelson, Cary, and Lawrence Grossberg (eds.) (1988). Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinoise Press.
61. Oakley, Ann (1974). Woman’s Work: The Housewife, Past and Present. New York: Vintage.
62. Parkin, Frank (1971). Class, Inequality, and Political Order. New York
63. Parkin, Frank.(1978). Social stratification. In Tom Bottomore and Robert Nisbet (eds.), A History of Sociological Analysis, pp. 599-632. New York: Basic Books.
64. Parkin, Frank.(1979). Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique. New York: Columbia University Press.
65. Pateman, Carole (1988). The Sexual Contract. Stanford Stanford University Press.
66. Poulantzas, Nicos (1973). Political Power and Social classes. London: New Left Books.
67. Poulantzas, Nicos.(1975). Classes in Contemporary Capitalism. London: New Left Books.
68. Pratt, Mary Louise (1986). Fieldwork in common places. In Clifford and Marcus (eds.), Writing Culture, pp. 27-50 Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
69. Press, Andrea (1991). Women Watching Television. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
70. Press, Andrea.(1990). Class, gender, and the female viewer: Women’s responses to Dynasty. In Mary Ellen Brown (ed.) Television and Women’s Culture. Newbury Park: Sage.
71. Press, Andrea.(1989). Class and gender in the hegemonic process: Class differences in women’s perceptions of television realism and identification with television characters. Media, Culture, and Society 11(2): 229-252.
72. Rabinow, Paul (1977). Reflections on Fieldwork in Morocco. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
73. Rabinow, Paul.(1986). Representations are social facts: Modernity and post-modernity in anthropology. In Clifford and Marcus (eds.), Writing Culture, pp. 234-261. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
74. Radway, Janice (1984). Reading the Romance. Chapel Hill, N. C: University of North Carolina Press.
75. Radway, Janice.(1988). Reception study: Ethnography and the problems of dispersed subjects, Cultural Studies, 2(3): 359-376.
76. Rosoldo, Michele (1980). The use and abuse of anthropology: Reflections on feminism and cross-cultural understanding. Signs 5(3): 389-417.
77. Rubin, Lillian B. (1976). Worlds of Pain: Life in the Working-Class Family. New York: Basic Books.
78. Rubin, Lillian B. (1979). Women of a Certain Age: The Midlife Search for Self. New York: Harper & Row.
79. Rubin, Lillian B.(1983). Intimate Strangers: Men and Women Together. New York: Harper & Row.
80. Ryan, Mary P. (1975). Womanhood in America: From Colonial Times to the Present. New York: New Viewpoints.
81. Sanjek, Roger (ed.) (1990). Fieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
82. Scott, Joan Wallach (1988). Gender and the Politics of History. New York: Columbia University Press.
83. Seiter, Ellen (1990). Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview. Cultural Studies 4(1): 61-84.
84. Seiter, Ellen, H. Borchers, G. Kreutzner, and E. Warth (eds.) (1989). Remote Control: Television, Audiences, and Cultural Power. London: Rutledge.
85. Sewell, William (1989). Toward a theory of structure: duality, agency, and transformations. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Center for the Study of Social Transformations, Working Paper No. 29.
86. Shostak, Marjorie (1981). Nisa: The Life and Words of a !Kung woman. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
87. Smith, Zena (1972). Maternal aspirations, socialization, and achievement of boys and girls in the white working class. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 1(1): 35-57.
88. Spradley, James P., and Michael A. Rynkiewich (eds.) (1975). The Nacirema. Boston: Little, Brown.
89. Stacey, Judith (1983). The new conservative feminism. Feminist Studies 9(3): 559-584.
90. Stacey, Judith.(1987). Sexism by a subtler name: Postindustrial conditions and postfeminist consciousness in the Silicon Valley. Socialist Review 17(96): 7-30.
91. Strathern, Marilyn (1987). An awkward relationship: The Case of Feminism and anthropology. Signs 12(2): 276-292.
92. Whyte, William Foote (1943). Street Corner Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
93. Whyte, William Foote.(1967). On Street Corner Society. In Ernest W. Burgess and Donald J. Bogue (eds.), Urban Socioligy, pp. 156-168. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
94. Wright, Eric O. (1976). Class boundaries in advanced capitalist societies. New Left Review 93.
95. Wright, Eric O.(1978). Class, Crisis, and the State. London: New Left Books.