A distributed approach for estimating catchment evapotranspiration: Comparison of the combination equation and the complementary relationship approaches

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1509-1523

  Xu, Z X ^a   Li, J Y ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YAMANASHI   (Japan)

^b RENMIN UNIVERSITY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

Actual evapotranspiration; Catchments; Hydrological data; Land classification; Meteorological data; Potential evaporation

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; HYDROLOGY; LAND USE;

CATCHMENT EVAPOTRANSPIRATION;

EVAPOTRANSPIRATION;

CATCHMENT; ESTIMATION METHOD; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; LAND CLASSIFICATION; RIVER BASIN;

EID: 0037868277     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.1196     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bouchet RJ. 1963. Evapotranspiration réelle et potentielle, signification climatique. General Assembly Berkeley, Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol., Gentbrugge, Belgium, Publ. No. 62: 134-142.
2. Bouraoui F, Vachaud G, Haverkamp R, Normand B. 1997. A distributed physical approach for surface-subsurface water transport modeling in agricultural watersheds. Journal of Hydrology 203: 79-92.
3. Brutsaert W, Stricker H. 1979. An advection-aridity approach to estimate actual regional evapotranspiration. Water Resources Research 15(2): 443-450.
4. Crago RD. 1996. Comparison of the evaporative fraction and the Priestley-Taylor method for parameterizing daytime evaporation. Water Resources Research 32(5): 1403-1409.
5. Doyle P. 1990. Modelling catchment evaporation: an objective comparison of the Penman and Morton approaches. Journal of Hydrology 121: 257-276.
6. Dunn SM, Mackay R. 1995. Spatial variation in evapotranspiration and the influence of land use on catchment hydrology. Journal of Hydrology 171: 49-73.
7. Eichinger W, Parlange MB, Stricker H. 1996. On the concept of equilibrium evaporation and the value of the Priestley-Taylor coefficient. Water Resources Research 32(1): 161-164.
8. Flerchinger GN, Hanson CL, Wight JR. 1996. Modeling evapotranspiration and surface energy budgets across a catchment. Water Resources Research 32(8): 2539-2548.
9. Hobbins MT, Ramírez JA, Brown TC, Claessens LHJM. 2001a. The complementary relationship in estimation of regional evapotranspiration: the complementary relationship areal evapotranspiration and advection-aridity models. Water Resources Research 37(5): 1367-1387.
10. Hobbins MT, Ramírez JA, Brown TC. 2001b. The complementary relationship in estimation of regional evapotranspiration: an enhanced advection-aridity model. Water Resources Research 37(5): 1389- 1403.
11. Inclán MG, Forkel R. 1995. Comparison of energy fluxes calculated with the Penman-Monteith equation and the vegetation models SiB and Cupid. Journal of Hydrology 166: 193-211.
12. Jiang L, Islam S. 2001. Estimation of surface evaporation map over southern Great Plains using remote sensing data. Water Resources Research 37(2): 329-340.
13. Katul GG, Parlange MB. 1992. A Penman-Brutsaert model for wet surface evaporation. Water Resources Research 28(1): 121-126.
14. Kite GW, Dalton A, Dion K. 1994. Simulation of streamflow in a macroscale watershed using general circulation model data. Water Resources Research 30(5): 1547-1559.
15. Kotoda K. 1986. Estimation of river basin evapotranspiration. Environ. Res. Centr., The Univ. of Tsukuba, No. 8, pp. 68.
16. Lindsey SD, Farnsworth RK. 1997. Sources of solar radiation estimates and their effect on daily potential evaporation for use in streamflow modeling. Journal of Hydrology 201: 348-366.
17. Lindström G, Johansson B, Persson M, Gardelin M, Bergström S. 1997. Development and test of the distributed HBV-96 hydrological model. Journal of Hydrology 201: 272-288.
18. Morton FI. 1978. Estimating evapotranspiration from potential evaporation: practicality of an iconoclastic approach. Journal of Hydrology 38: 1-32.
19. Morton FI. 1983. Operational estimates of areal evapotranspiration and their significance to the science and practice of hydrology. Journal of Hydrology 66: 1-76.
20. Parlange MB, Katul GG. 1992. An advection-aridity evaporation model. Water Resources Research 28(1): 127-132.
21. Penman HL. 1948. Natural evaporation from open water, bare and grass. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A 193: 120-145.
22. Priestley CHB, Taylor RJ. 1972. On the assessment of surface heat fluxes and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Monthly Weather Review 100: 81-92.
23. Stannard DI. 1993. Comparison of Penman-Monteith, Shuttleworth-Wallace, and modified Priestley-Taylor evapotranspiration models for wildland vegetation in semiarid rangeland. Water Resources Research 29(5): 1379-1392.
24. Suzuki T, Terakawa H, Matsuura T. 1996. Development of physically-based distributed model for operational hydrological forecasting. Civ. Engrg. Tech. Rep., Tsukuba, Japan (in Japanese), No. 38(10): 26-31.
25. Vörösmarty CJ, Federer CA, Schloss AL. 1998. Potential evaporation functions compared on US watersheds: possible implications for global-scale water balance and terrestrial ecosystem system modeling. Journal of Hydrology 207: 147-169.
26. Xu ZX, Ito K, Schultz GA, Li JY. 2001. Integrated hydrologic modeling and GIS in water resources management. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE 15(3): 217-223.
27. Yakirevich A, Berliner P, Sorek S. 1997. A model for numerical simulating of evaporation from bare saline soil. Water Resources Research 33(5): 1021-1033.
28. Yates DN. 1997. Approaches to continental scale runoff for integrated assessment models. Journal of Hydrology 201: 289-310.
29. Zhang L, Dawes WR, Walker GR. 2001. Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resources Research 37(3): 701-708.