Hydrogen bonding in redox-modulated molecular recognition. An experimental and theoretical investigation

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 125, Issue 26, 2003, Pages 7882-7888

  Gray, Mark ^a   Cuello, Alejandro O ^a   Cooke, Graeme ^b   Rotello, Vincent M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROSTATICS; PARAMAGNETIC RESONANCE; POLARIZATION;

MOLECULAR RECOGNITION;

HYDROGEN BONDS;

ANION; DIAMINOPYRIDINE; DIAMINOPYRIDINE RECEPTOR; DIAMINOTRIAZINE DERIVATIVE; DIAMINOTRIAZINE RECEPTOR; IMIDE; NAPHTHALIMIDE; PYRIDINE DERIVATIVE; RADICAL; RECEPTOR; TRIAZINE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; HYBRID; HYDROGEN BOND; HYPOTHESIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; POLARIZATION; RECEPTOR AFFINITY; RECEPTOR BINDING; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SIMULATION;

ELECTROSTATICS; HYDROGEN BONDING; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NAPHTHALENES; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; PYRIDINES; TRIAZINES;

EID: 0037864487     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja035228b     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Jeffrey, G. A.; Saenger, W. Hydrogen Bonding in Biological Structures; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1991.
2. Fersht, A. R. Enzyme Structure and Mechanism; W. H. Freeman & Co.: New York, 1985.
3. Blakely, R. L.; Benkovic, S. J. Chemistry and Biochemistry of Pterins; Wiley: New York, 1985.
4. Anthony, C. Biochem. J. 1996, 320, 697-711.
5. Popov, V.; Lamzin, V. S. Biochem. J. 1994, 301, 625-643.
6. Ghisla, S.; Massey, V. Eur. J. Biochem. 1989, 181, 1-17.
7. Otsuki, J.; Tsujino, M.; Iizaki, T.; Araki, K.; Seno, M.; Takatera, K.; Watanabe, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7895-7896.
8. Anelli, P. L.; Spencer, N.; Stoddart, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 5131-5133.
9. De Silva, A. P.; Gunaratne, H. Q. N.; McCoy, C. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7891-7892.
10. Swager, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12593-12602.
11. (a) Cooke, G.; Rotello, V. M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002, 31, 275-286.
12. (b) Prins, L. J.; Reinhoudt, D.; Timmerman, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2382.
13. Niemz, A.; Rotello, V. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 44-52.
14. (a) Ge, Y.; Miller, L.; Ouimet, T.; Smith, D. K. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 8831.
15. (b) Ge, Y.; Lilienthal, R. R.; Smith, D. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3976.
16. (c) Tucker, J. H. R.; Collinson. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002, 31, 147.
17. Kaifer, A. E.; Gómez-Kaifer, M. Supramolecular Electrochemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1999.
18. (a) Stone, A. J. The Theory of Intermolecular Forces; Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1996.
19. (b) Scheiner, S. Hydrogen Bonding: A Theoretical Perspective; Oxford University Press: New York, 1997.
20. See, for example: (a) Kitaura, K.; Morokuma, K. J. Quantum Chem. 1976, 10, 325-340.
21. (b) Reed, A. E.; Weinhold, F.; Curtiss, L. A.; Pochatko, D. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 84, 5687-5705.
22. (c) Reed, A. E.; Curtiss, L. A.; Weinhold, F. Chem. Rev. 1988, 88, 899-926.
23. (d) Weinhold, F. THEOCHEM-J. Mol. Struct. 1997, 399, 181-197.
24. (e) van der Vaart, A.; Merz, K. M., Jr. J. Phys. Chem. Soc. 1999, 103, 3321-3329.
25. See, for example: (a) Buckingham, A. D.; Fowler, P. W.; Hutson, J. M. Chem. Rev. 1988, 88, 963-988.
26. (b) Singh, U. C.; Kollman, P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 4875-4894.
27. (c) Spackman, M. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 85, 6587-6601.
28. Niemz, A.; Rotello, V. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6833-6836.
29. Niemz, A.; Rotello, V. M. J. Mol. Recognit. 1996, 9, 158-162.
30. Dunger, A.; Limbach, H.-H.; Weisz, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10109-10114.
31. NIEHS WinSim EPR, Duling, D., Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics, NIEHS, NIH, DHHS, 1994.
32. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B. G.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, revision A.9; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
33. 4DAT, etc.
34. (a) Besler, B. H.; Merz, K. M.; Kollman, P. A. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 431.
35. (b) Singh, U. C.; Kollman, P. A. J. Comput. Chem. 1984, 5, 129.
36. Implemented within the Gaussian suite of programs using: Glendening, E. D.; Reed, A. E.; Carpenter, J. E.; Weinhold, F. NBO Version 3.1.
37. Previous experimental results have demonstrated that receptors 2 and 3 do not dimerize or aggregate under the experimental conditions used in our study.
38. Long, J. R.; Drago, R. S. J. Chem. Soc. 1982, 59, 1037-1039.
39. For further information, see: Conners, K. Binding Constants; Wiley and Sons: New York, 1987.