Interface of information technology and neuropsychology: Ethical issues and recommendations

Clinical Neuropsychologist

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 536-547

  Bush, Shane ^a,d   Naugle, Richard ^b   Johnson Greene, Doug ^c  

^a independent practice   (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; EMOTION; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; TELECOMMUNICATION;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COGNITION DISORDERS; HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INTERNET; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; TELECOMMUNICATIONS;

EID: 0037851012     PISSN: 13854046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/clin.16.4.536.13911     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adams, K.M. (1986). Concepts and methods in the design of automata for neuropsychological test interpretation. In S.B. Filskov & T.J. Boll (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neuropsychology (Vol. 2, pp. 561-576). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Adams, K.M., & Brown, G.G. (1986). The role of the computer in neuropsychological assessment. In I. Grant & K.M. Adams (Eds.), Neuropsychological assessment of neuropsychiatric disorders (pp. 87-99). New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Adams, K.M., & Heaton, R.G.K. (1985). Automated interpretation of neuropsychological test data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 790-802.
4. Adams, K.M., & Heaton, R.K. (1987). Computerized neuropsychological assessment: Issues and applications. In J.N. Butcher (Ed.), Computerized psychological assessment: A practitioner's guide (pp. 355-365). New York: Basic Books.
5. Adams, K.M., Kvale, V.I., & Keegan, J.F. (1984). Relative accuracy of three automated systems for neuropsychological interpretation. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 6, 413-431.
6. Alpert, S.A. (1998). Health care information: Access, confidentiality, and good practice. In K.W. Goodman (Ed.), Ethics, computing, and medicine: Informatics and the transformation of health care. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology. (2001). Policy statement on the presence of third party observers in neuropsychological assessments. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 14, 433-439.
8. American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597-1611.
9. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. www.apa.org/ethics
10. American Psychological Association, Committee on Psychological Tests and Assessment. (2002). Statement on observers of psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, Science Directorate. http://www.apa.org/science
11. American Psychological Association Practice Directorate. (2002a). How the HIPAA privacy rule will affect practitioners. Practitioner Focus, 14, 3, 15.
12. American Psychological Association Practice Directorate. (2002b). Survey provides snapshot of young members' practices and priorities. Practitioner Focus, 14, 10-11.
13. American Psychology-Law Society and Division 41 of the American Psychological Association. (1991). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 655-665.
14. Bieliauskas, L., Fastenau, P., Lacy, M., & Roper, B. (1997). Use of the odds ratio to translate neuropsychological test scores into real-world outcomes: From statistical significance to clinical significance. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19, 889-896.
15. Binder, L.M., & Thompson, L.L. (1995). The ethics code and neuropsychological assessment practices. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 10, 27-46.
16. Brittain, J.L., Frances, J.P., & Barth, J.T. (1995). Ethical issues and dilemmas in neuropsychological practice reported by ABCN diplomates. Advances in Medical Psychotherapy, 8, 1-22.
17. Bush, S. (2002). The interface of information technology and rehabilitation psychology: Ethical issues and recommendations. Rehabilitation Psychology, 47, 356 [abstract].
18. Bynum, T.W., & Fodor, J.L. (1998). Medical informatics and human values. In K.W. Goodman (Ed.), Ethics, computing, and medicine: Informatics and the transformation of health care. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Canadian Psychological Association (1991). The Canadian code of ethics for psychologists (Rev. ed.). Old Chelsea, Que.: Author.
20. Constantinou, M., Ashendorf, L., & McCaffrey, R.J. (in press). When the third party observer of a neuropsychological evaluation is an audio-recorder. The Clinical Neuropsychologist.
21. Goodman, K.W. (1998). Bioethics and health informatics: An introduction. In K.W. Goodman (Ed.), Ethics, computing, and medicine: Informatics and the transformation of health care. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Grohol, J.M. (2000). The insider's guide to mental health resources [On-line, 2000/2001 ed.]. New York: The Guilford Press.
23. Grove, W.M., Zald, D.H., Lebow, B.S., Snitz, B.E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 19-30.
24. Johnson-Greene, D., Hardy-Morais, C., Adams, K.M., Hardy, C., & Bergloff, P. (1997). Informed consent and neuropsychological assessment: Ethical considerations and proposed guidelines. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11, 454-460.
25. Jones, C. (2002). Held to a higher standard: Privacy rule includes enhanced protection for psychotherapy notes. Practitioner Focus, 14, 5-14.
26. McMinn, M.R., Buchanan, T., Ellens, B.M., & Ryan, M.K. (1999). Technology, professional practice, and ethics survey findings and implications. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 165-172.
27. McSweeny, A.J., Becker, B.C., Naugle, R.I., Snow, W.G., Binder, L.M., & Thompson, L.L. (1998). Ethical issues related to the presence of third-party observers in clinical neuropsychological evaluations. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12, 552-559.
28. Meehl, P.E. (1954). Clinical vs. statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and review of evidence. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
29. Miller, R.A., & Goodman, K.W. (1998). Ethical challenges in the use of decision-support software in clinical practice. In K.W. Goodman (Ed.), Ethics, computing, and medicine: Informatics and the transformation of health care. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. National Academy of Neuropsychology. (2000a). Presence of third party observing during neuropsychological testing: Official position statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 379-380.
31. National Academy of Neuropsychology. (2000b). Test security: Official position statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 383-386.
32. Putnam, S.H., DeLuca, J.W., & Anderson, C. (1994). The second TCN salary survey: A survey of neuropsychologists, Part II. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 8, 245-282.
33. Rizzo, A., Schultheis, M., & Rothbaum, B. (2002). Ethical issues of the use of virtual reality in the psychological sciences. In S. Bush & M. Drexler (Eds.), Ethical issues in clinical neuropsychology. Lisse, NL: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.
34. Schatz, P., & Browndyke, J. (2002). Applications of computer-based neuropsychological assessment. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 17, 395-410.
35. Sweet, J., Grote, C., & van Gorp, W. (2002). Ethical issues in neuropsychology in forensic settings. In S. Bush & M. Drexler (Eds.), Ethical issues in clinical neuropsychology. Lisse, NL: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.
36. Sweet, J.J., & Peck, E.A. (2002). National Academy of Neuropsychology/Division 40 of the American Psychological Association Practice Survey of Clinical Neuropsychology in the United States, Part I: Practitioner and practice characteristics, professional activities, and time requirements. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16, 109-127.
37. Wedding, D., & Faust, D. (1989). Clinical judgment and decision-making in neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 4, 233-265.
38. Wilde, E., Bush, S., & Zeifert, P. (2002). Ethical issues in neuropsychology in medical settings. In S. Bush & M. Drexler (Eds.), Ethical issues in clinical neuropsychology. Lisse, NL: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.